Re: [dev] [DISCUSS] Was: [VOTE] Development options for container support

2015-12-17 Thread Eric Johnson
+1 to #3 On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 8:31 AM, wrote: > Hi Sebastien, all, > > This would be a great development - good to see :) > > I agree option 3) looks the best. > > > > > It makes sense if we think that various API are going to emerge for > containers. In libcloud philosophy, we would provide

Re: [dev] [DISCUSS] Was: [VOTE] Development options for container support

2015-12-17 Thread philip.kershaw
Hi Sebastien, all, This would be a great development - good to see :) I agree option 3) looks the best. > > It makes sense if we think that various API are going to emerge for > containers. In libcloud philosophy, we would provide a single common API for > various container runtime. > > We w

Re: [dev] [DISCUSS] Was: [VOTE] Development options for container support

2015-12-17 Thread Tomaz Muraus
Agreed. That's also one of the cases, where imo, a prototype would be nice. On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Hi, > > I don’t want to be a pain but we don’t need a vote for this, it’s really a > technical discussion for which we need to reach consensus. > Votes are th

[dev] [DISCUSS] Was: [VOTE] Development options for container support

2015-12-17 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
Hi, I don’t want to be a pain but we don’t need a vote for this, it’s really a technical discussion for which we need to reach consensus. Votes are the last resort in ASF governance, they are used for releases and to break ties or conflicts. That said :) see inline > On Dec 17, 2015, at 6:41