Re: [dev] [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.20.1

2016-01-15 Thread Eric Johnson
Ok, CHANGES.rst fixed. New v0.20.1-tentative tag updated to 87deb04498ea8bb5068e362810c3d2ab89359b48 Release artifacts re-generated and uploaded to http://home.apache.org/~erjohnso/libcloud/ On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Tomaz Muraus wrote: > I believe so, yeah. > > Please also make sure

Re: [dev] [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.20.1

2016-01-15 Thread Tomaz Muraus
I believe so, yeah. Please also make sure the underline matches the title length (0.20.0 didn't have that, but it's fixed in trunk and we now have strict checking enabled). On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Eric Johnson wrote: > Good catch! > > While cherry-picking, the only commit I applied tha

Re: [dev] [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.20.1

2016-01-15 Thread Eric Johnson
Good catch! While cherry-picking, the only commit I applied that had a changelog entry was for LIBCLOUD-785. As such, does this look OK for the revised changes file? diff --git a/CHANGES.rst b/CHANGES.rst index 250869c..866962d 100644 --- a/CHANGES.rst +++ b/CHANGES.rst @@ -1,6 +1,16 @@ Changelo

Re: [dev] [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.20.1

2016-01-15 Thread Tomaz Muraus
Besides that, I diffed it against v0.20.0 and ran the tests and everything looks OK. I will re-test it and cast my vote once changelog is updated and release artifacts are re-generated. On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Tomaz Muraus wrote: > Just noticed CHANGES.rst was not updated. > > Need to

Re: [dev] [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.20.1

2016-01-15 Thread Tomaz Muraus
Just noticed CHANGES.rst was not updated. Need to add new section for 0.20.1 and shuffle corresponding changelog entries around. When that's done you should re-tag it. On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Eric Johnson wrote: > This is a voting thread for Libcloud 0.20.1. > > This is a bugfix relea

[dev] [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 0.20.1

2016-01-15 Thread Eric Johnson
This is a voting thread for Libcloud 0.20.1. This is a bugfix release. It consists of the following cherry-picked changes in trunk applied to the 0.20.0 release ( 4087f45504f7c3bbd0f389420e9ecbdedf93ded9): 88170f6582dd6cc3bce87c0ab3a89118551fe508 - Allow for old and new style service account cl

[dev] Introduction and questions

2016-01-15 Thread Luke Morfitt
Hello, I have just come across libcloud whilst looking at multi cloud management. We currently use Azure and AWS for our services and have plans for another cloud in the future. Without investigating options I have been writing our own abstraction layer to sit in front of Azure blob storage an