Hi Eric,
The downside is that we'll get the git commit history from the
original authors without the ("with xxx") signoff tag, but instead
that's replaced with a merge commit saying "merging GITHUB-123 by
blah", the merge commit has the parents of the original commits and as
long as we fetch the r
I agree that git-am can be a pain.
What I like about using it though, is that history is more forthcoming
about original author versus us showing up all the time.
"""
commit 065d1919d8cd1e651b92af6220b1408437b07563
Merge: 4897933 0d1a9d2
Author: Anthony Shaw
Date: Wed Oct 12 09:41:47 2016 +110
Hi,
Our PR process (applies to committers but anyone else is welcome to
weigh in) says to download the patch file from GitHub and apply the
patch using the `git am` command.
I find git am to be so fragile, typically I use the --3way flag to
help it try and resolve conflicts but normally is just s
