Re: [dev] WebAnalytics for LibCloud

2016-10-26 Thread Greg Hill
IIRC it sets a libcloud user-agent string, so you could check your analytics for requests from that user-agent. https://github.com/apache/libcloud/blob/82df6e961b6f3e581cb404a01acfee4ce49 8d1c6/libcloud/common/base.py#L684 Anything starting with "libcloud/". Greg On 10/26/16, 7:13 PM, "Samuel

Re: [dev] [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 1.0.0-pre1

2016-01-25 Thread Greg Hill
was push to the git server >along with the original vote thread so that will probably cause more >confusion! > >The tag will be created as v1.0.0-pre1 once we get the vote. > >On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:57 AM, Greg Hill >wrote: >> >> >> On 1/25/16, 1:54 PM,

Re: [dev] [VOTE] Release Apache Libcloud 1.0.0-pre1

2016-01-25 Thread Greg Hill
On 1/25/16, 1:54 PM, "anthony shaw" wrote: >A new -tentative tag is committed and can be found at >https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=libcloud.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/h >eads/v1.0-pre1. Shouldn't the tag be v1.0.0-pre1? Or does that not matter? /me is new to this process. Greg

Re: [dev] Closing JIRAs

2016-01-14 Thread Greg Hill
ot the case, please let us know. > >On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Greg Hill >wrote: > >> I have a few open JIRAs that have been fixed, but the JIRA status was >> never updated. Am I just supposed to update the JIRA? I assumed some >> automation would take care of it. >> >> Greg >> >>

[dev] Closing JIRAs

2016-01-14 Thread Greg Hill
I have a few open JIRAs that have been fixed, but the JIRA status was never updated. Am I just supposed to update the JIRA? I assumed some automation would take care of it. Greg

Re: [dev] [DISCUSS] Was: [VOTE] Development options for container support

2016-01-05 Thread Greg Hill
If you want, I can reach out to the Carina team here at Rackspace for feedback. I think it fits the mold here. It's only in beta right now, but they might have some useful feedback for this sort of API and might want to add support for their product. https://getcarina.com/ Greg On 1/5/16, 2:3

Re: [dev] Openstack Designate support?

2015-12-08 Thread Greg Hill
e/API_ListResourceRec >ordSets.html > >Thanks, >Kiall > >-Original Message- >From: Greg Hill [mailto:greg.h...@rackspace.com] >Sent: 08 December 2015 16:01 >To: dev@libcloud.apache.org >Cc: Mac Innes, Kiall >Subject: Re: [dev] Openstack Designate support? >

Re: [dev] Openstack Designate support?

2015-12-08 Thread Greg Hill
, "Patrick Galbraith" wrote: >Hi there ‹ KIall would knowŠ. > > >> On Dec 4, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Greg Hill wrote: >> >> Designate is the Openstack DNS API. I don't think libcloud supports it >>yet. Is anyone working on this? If not, I can probably get to it >>soon(ish). >> >> Greg >

[dev] Openstack Designate support?

2015-12-04 Thread Greg Hill
Designate is the Openstack DNS API. I don't think libcloud supports it yet. Is anyone working on this? If not, I can probably get to it soon(ish). Greg

Re: [dev] Google Storage tests really slow?

2015-11-30 Thread Greg Hill
bject: Re: COMMERCIAL:Re: [dev] Google Storage tests really slow? Ok, cool. Good debug. Looking into it now. On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Greg Hill mailto:greg.h...@rackspace.com>> wrote: Yep, it's attempting to contact the google API: GoogleBaseConnection.__i

[dev] Re: COMMERCIAL:Re: [dev] Google Storage tests really slow?

2015-11-30 Thread Greg Hill
ute tests. I'll see if I can figure it out. Greg On 11/30/15, 2:43 PM, "Greg Hill" wrote: >I do my dev on a local macbook. Those appear to be the same tests causing >me grief. Since you mentioned that you weren't having issues on another >server, I ran the tests on

Re: [dev] Google Storage tests really slow?

2015-11-30 Thread Greg Hill
n issue tracking this in Jira? >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Eric Johnson >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +scott since he was recently doing some work on the GCS driver. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Greg Hill >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Is this a known issue? The google storage tests take a really really >>>>> long time to complete. Are they waiting on a timeout or something? >>>>> >>>>> Greg >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>

Re: [dev] Google Storage tests really slow?

2015-11-30 Thread Greg Hill
local code changes are limited to openstack/rackspace drivers so they shouldn't impact GCE. Greg On 11/30/15, 12:51 PM, "Eric Johnson" wrote: >+scott since he was recently doing some work on the GCS driver. > >On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Greg Hill >wrote: > &g

[dev] Google Storage tests really slow?

2015-11-30 Thread Greg Hill
Is this a known issue? The google storage tests take a really really long time to complete. Are they waiting on a timeout or something? Greg

[dev] Re: COMMERCIAL:Re: [dev] Re: COMMERCIAL:Re: [dev] RDNS in libcloud

2015-11-30 Thread Greg Hill
On 11/26/15, 11:24 PM, "anthony shaw" wrote: >good point, maybe create a method in the dns driver that accepts a node. >in >the same way in the load balancer driver there's an attach_node method. >that way you can access the IPs and it's easier for the user to unders

[dev] Re: COMMERCIAL:Re: [dev] RDNS in libcloud

2015-11-25 Thread Greg Hill
I know PTRs are strictly 'DNS' but this seems like it belongs in the >> compute driver instead of the DNS driver. the implementation is going >>to be >> a bit wonky otherwise. >> That way you could just set PTR record for a node. Then it can lookup >>the >

[dev] RDNS in libcloud

2015-11-24 Thread Greg Hill
I'm working on adding PTR support to the Rackspace DNS driver as an extension. It's my understanding that not all providers offer an API for RDNS, so I didn't think it was worth adding to the base dns driver. Because you don't own the zone, the API endpoint is different (/rdns in the case of R

[dev] Re: COMMERCIAL:Re: [dev] Re: COMMERCIAL:Re: [dev] Re: COMMERCIAL:Re: [dev] CleanupPRs

2015-11-24 Thread Greg Hill
for improvement. but the intention is to improve that by >making sure we complete the code reviews promptly and merge quickly where >everything is ok. > > >Sent from Outlook > > > > >On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:40 AM -0800, "Allard Hoeve" >wrote: > > >

[dev] Re: COMMERCIAL:Re: [dev] Re: COMMERCIAL:Re: [dev] Cleanup PRs

2015-11-23 Thread Greg Hill
This one: On 11/23/15, 11:28 AM, "Allard Hoeve" wrote: >>> > [LIBCLOUD-728] Add SSLError to retry decorator exceptions >>> > #556 opened on Jul 31 by thesquelched >>> > -1 >

[dev] Re: COMMERCIAL:Re: [dev] Cleanup PRs

2015-11-23 Thread Greg Hill
I understand the motivation here, but I think we need to be careful. Expecting people to reopen valid PRs isn't really a good approach, IMO. Those people will just move along and use something else, or worse, fork the project. I keep encouraging my coworkers to contribute fixes upstream, but they k

[dev] Re: COMMERCIAL:Re: [dev] Re: COMMERCIAL:[dev] help with pending PR

2015-07-05 Thread Greg Hill
added some comments though. There is a bit >more >work to be done, but after the comments are addressed, the PR should be >ready to be merged :) > >On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Greg Hill >wrote: > >> A coworker of mine did this one to add some resilience to the clie

[dev] Re: COMMERCIAL:[dev] help with pending PR

2015-07-03 Thread Greg Hill
A coworker of mine did this one to add some resilience to the client and make the exceptions libcloud throws more useful to consuming code. https://github.com/apache/libcloud/pull/515 Would love to get that in this release if possible. Greg On 7/3/15, 2:40 AM, "sebgoa" wrote: >Also, we have

[dev] generic Exceptions on any non-200/201 response?

2015-01-05 Thread Greg Hill
It appears that libcloud throws an 'Exception' with any response other than 200/201: https://github.com/apache/libcloud/blob/trunk/libcloud/common/base.py#L116 https://github.com/apache/libcloud/blob/trunk/libcloud/common/base.py#L153 This behavior is apparently not well understand by the driver