Re: [dev] LIBCLOUD-122: Unified Virtual Network Support

2011-11-13 Thread Tomaž Muraus
Sorry for the delay, I'm adding more replies in-line. On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Hutson Betts wrote: > Thanks for the input! I greatly appreciate the feedback on the patch, > and your thoughts regarding virtual networking. > > > > > - Imo, if we decide to create a new API it should be cal

Re: [dev] LIBCLOUD-122: Unified Virtual Network Support

2011-11-13 Thread Hutson Betts
Dear Tomaž > > > If there is a term that could better describe that property, please let > > me know. Even a netmask, or address class property in place of Size would > > work. > > I would only need to implement methods to convert between the general > > property and the property used by the clou

Re: [dev] LIBCLOUD-122: Unified Virtual Network Support

2011-11-13 Thread Tomaž Muraus
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Hutson Betts wrote: > Dear Tomaž > > > > > > > If there is a term that could better describe that property, please let > > > me know. Even a netmask, or address class property in place of Size > would > > > work. > > > I would only need to implement methods to con

Re: [dev] LIBCLOUD-122: Unified Virtual Network Support

2011-11-13 Thread Hutson Betts
Dear Tomaž, Actually, ipcalc.Network seems like a fantastic drop-in replacement for networking.base.Network. It provides all the functionality I mentioned in the previous e-mail, plus IPv6 support, and doctests. Furthermore, we can stay with the VPCNetwork (Amazon's Virtual Private CLoud) idea, s