Umm just hold on here a second...
The DRK(s) contain a selection of components created either for or by Macromedia and
are being sold as a commercial product (developers need to get paid you understand)
The Developers exchanges (http://www.macromedia.com/exchange) are still chocked full
of Free
> Spot on! Exactly right.
Std. Linux Distro to firewall - 5 years experience, 1 howto, 1 day to
install and a day a month admin.
Smoothwall - 20 minutes . Done.
Justin
--
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For ad
> > IpTables does all of this
>
> I agree that *any* linux box with iptables/chains will
> work...but it just that it takes quiet a while and expertise
> to lock down a normal distro.
>
> If you just want something you can install and forget
> smoothwall/ipcop etc are great. And you don't have
> IpTables does all of this
I agree that *any* linux box with iptables/chains will work...but it just
that it takes quiet a while and expertise to lock down a normal distro.
If you just want something you can install and forget smoothwall/ipcop etc
are great.
And you don't have to think about upd
I am intriguedwhat would make the Enterprise Manager "Perfect"?
-Original Message-
From: Paul Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 January 2003 17:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] firewall
> >
> > there is nothing cuddly about that GUI... it is evil.
> >
I
> >
> > there is nothing cuddly about that GUI... it is evil.
> >
I have to say, in defence of a Micros**t product (me? Defending MS), that
the Enterprise Manager is probably the only GUI that they have made that I
have found to be useful, easy and does the job well and reliably (although
not p
hatstand?
> -Original Message-
> From: Snake Hollywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 January 2003 17:24
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Spot the problem - IN()
>
>
> Yep if it's not a query column.
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rich Wild [mailto
Yep if it's not a query column.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rich Wild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 January 2003 17:15
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Spot the problem - IN()
>
>
> > quoted valuelist()
>
> that'll be listqualify() then? ;P
>
> > -Orig
muppet
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 January 2003 17:00
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] firewall
>
>
> there is nothing cuddly about that GUI... it is evil.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Robertson-Ravo, Neil
IpTables does all of this
altho smoothwall does rock :D
At 17:21 27/01/2003 +, you wrote:
The £150 quid is for support etc. and for a version that is slightly better
than the GPL version. These version also allows modules to be added for
various stuff - like hosting...
> If it's only £1
The £150 quid is for support etc. and for a version that is slightly better
than the GPL version. These version also allows modules to be added for
various stuff - like hosting...
> If it's only £150 for the cost of install etc, it's worth it. I paid £100
> to my mate who also supports it for
> quoted valuelist()
that'll be listqualify() then? ;P
> -Original Message-
> From: Snake Hollywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 January 2003 17:18
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Spot the problem - IN()
>
>
> As per my previous post, just output the variables
As per my previous post, just output the variables directly, and wrap it
in a quoted valuelist() function to wrap quotes around all values.
Russ
> -Original Message-
> From: Taz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 January 2003 16:56
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] S
i'll let you decide.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 January 2003 17:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] firewall
are you saying I am?
- Original Message -
From: "Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTEC
are you saying I am?
- Original Message -
From: "Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 5:00 PM
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] firewall
can't say I have seen them..but then again, I am not anti-ms
-Original Message-
From: To
can't say I have seen them..but then again, I am not anti-ms
-Original Message-
From: Tom Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 January 2003 17:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] firewall
badly on some occasions.
- Original Message -
From: "Robertson-Ravo, Neil
badly on some occasions.
- Original Message -
From: "Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 4:57 PM
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] firewall
does the job...
-Original Message-
From: Tom Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
does the job...
-Original Message-
From: Tom Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 January 2003 17:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] firewall
there is nothing cuddly about that GUI... it is evil.
- Original Message -
From: "Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)" <[EMAIL
there is nothing cuddly about that GUI... it is evil.
- Original Message -
From: "Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 4:08 PM
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] firewall
Oh, and you dont need to use Enterprise Manager to admin a DB.
> seeing as you're using UUIDs, just qualify them first:
Oh yeah, that's way better!
Hadn't thought of that one
Taz
--
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human
I have been using Smoothwall for over a year now and had very few problems
(the problems are mainly to do with the hardware)
Needs about 40MB of space (last time I checked - about 2 iterations ago),
and it's easy to install. Download the CD ISO from smoothwall.org and then
burn it onto disc and s
As it's a list anyway, why don't you j7ust output the list instead of
looping over it and outputitng each item.
WHERE journoid IN (#attributes.journoid#)
Russ Michaels
Macromedia/Allaire Certified ColdFusion Developer
Satachi Internet Development
Unit 2, 7A Plough Yard
London EC2A 3LP
Phon
Dave,
the problem you were having (I should think) was that your clause for
putting in a comma was if:
Current Element != Last element of the list
But if you have another element in the list which has the same value as the
last one, it will fall over.
Thats why I posted the code that looks at
Well if you would like to provide support to all our clients writing all
the SQL to access the system stored procs to manage databases remotely
without enterprise manager, your welcome. But as the cost would be more
than the hosting fees, I wouldn't be able to pay you anything.
> -Original Me
Smoothwall ooohh
but if you want a firewall
www.iptables.org
Linux based and free and lovely
At 16:12 27/01/2003 +, you wrote:
It's not alinux jobbie is it, cozz I have no exp with linux at all.
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin MacCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent
> If b is only a number then how come the above line of code works
perfectly.
b isn't a number, I was purposely trying to give you the wrong answer
because I'm evil. Not cos I'm thick, oh no, that wasn't why.
seeing as you're using UUIDs, just qualify them first:
WHERE journoid IN (#listqualify
> I can redeem myself (god how embarrasing - must get more sleep) by saying
> that my last bit still stands - don't understand why you're using all that
> loop gubbins when you could just use:
I assumed that it was because journalid was of type char or varchar instead
of a numeric data type
-
aha. cos you're using UUIDs.
I'll go away and shoot myself quietly now. You'll never even know I was
here.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rich Wild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 January 2003 16:37
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Spot the problem - IN()
>
>
> I
Got this error when using a C++ CFX tag on CFMX. The same tag works fine on
CF5.
coldfusion.tagext.DerivedNativeCFXException
Unable to load library
Any idea?
Paolo
-Original Message-
From: Rich Wild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 January 2003 16:31
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:
I can redeem myself (god how embarrasing - must get more sleep) by saying
that my last bit still stands - don't understand why you're using all that
loop gubbins when you could just use:
WHERE journoid IN (#attributes.journoid#)
Rich "Spastic of the Day" Wild
> -Original Message-
> From
Many thanks for the replies. I have discovered that the problem stemmed
further up the page in a previous query which was getting two id's that
were the same hence the ListLast() NEQ d always evaluated to TRUE.
When you have the following loop:
WHERE journoTown.townid IN ('#b#', )
If b is onl
bollocks, ignore me. I'm tired and wrong.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rich Wild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 January 2003 16:27
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Spot the problem - IN()
>
>
> this bit is the wrong bit:
>
> ,
>
> listlast returns the value o
Yes, we have no wombats!
--
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
freesco.org or clark connect
Linux based distros one of which runs on floppy disk only and needs two net
cards
both have easy admin screens
Believe clark connect has a nice admin interface.
Freesco is more a port blocker than a rule based firewall but is quite
adequate.
Nik swears by Clark Con
this bit is the wrong bit:
,
listlast returns the value of the final index of a list.
so listlast('1,2,3,4') returns '4'
when looping over a list, the index variable (here you're using 'd') gives
you the position of that index.
ie #d#,
won't give you the actual values 'apple' etc, it'll giv
:-), its an optionregardless of the headaches...
I do understand about the FTp, there are some muppets out there.
-Original Message-
From: Snake Hollywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 January 2003 16:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] firewall
Oh yeah give ever
Try this:
WHERE MyVal IN (
,
'#ListGetAt(MyList, i)#'
)
--
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is a linux distro but you don't need any linux to use it. Point and
click,
& web interface..
You might need the hosting module too.
Justin
> -Original Message-
> From: Snake Hollywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 January 2003 16:12
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ cf-
is there some sort of issue with your list delimiters? Maybe specify what
these are in your ListLast function.
Duncan Cumming
IT Manager
http://www.alienationdesign.co.uk
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 0141 575 9700
Fax: 0141 575 9600
Creative solutions in a technical world
--
Oh yeah give everyone VPN access, and the support nightmare to do that
for every client, teach them how to setup their end, help then setup
their own office firewall to allow it etc etc.
A lot of clients cannot even get ftp working without help, so what do
you think would happen with a VPN.
> ---
Both of you take ten paces, turn and start throwing handbags.
Taz
--
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am running into a problem with a query that is looking at a list to get
the records for items in the list. I have three queries all running very
similar code and the last query is not putting the comma in between the
list items and therefore is returning no records.
The line of code is:
It's not alinux jobbie is it, cozz I have no exp with linux at all.
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin MacCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 January 2003 16:05
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] firewall
>
>
> Agreed and if you what it all without hassle, look
Oh, and you dont need to use Enterprise Manager to admin a DBonly if you
want to use the cuddly MS Gui.
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 January 2003 16:08
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] firewall
Hey, no probs
Hey, no probs
VPN, Netilla.. or some other secure off-site connection
-Original Message-
From: Snake Hollywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 January 2003 16:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] firewall
Thanks Neil, but we are not stupid either, we provide hosting
Thanks Neil, but we are not stupid either, we provide hosting services
and clients need to use enterprise manager to access their databases.
If an SQL server does not face the web it is not possible to do this.
And as we are not stupid either, we do not wish to make a trip to
telehouse everytime we
Agreed and if you what it all without hassle, look at smoothwall.co.uk
GPL -> free
Corp server £150 with support.
20 mins to install, web interface, snort (ids - hada rule at 9pm for the sql
worm)
Automatic updates etc etc. runs on a 486!! DMZ ETC ETC..
Justin
> -Original Message-
> F
Yes, I did see it, and it does ONLY affect SQL2K, but then again, we are not
stupid enough to have our SQL Servers facing the web.
-Original Message-
From: Snake Hollywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 January 2003 16:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] firewall
It's b
Any firewall will protect any version of SQL server so it is not
relevent. A firewall basically blocks ports and IP addresses and the
likes, it doesn't protect specific applications.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 January
it was port 1434, which enterprise manager uses, so if u allow this,
your open to more of the same.
> -Original Message-
> From: Taz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 January 2003 15:50
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] firewall
>
>
>
> > After this weekends love
It's been all over the news Neil, I cannot believe u haven't seen it. It
affected the whole internet.
SQL server 2000
> -Original Message-
> From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 January 2003 15:41
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] fire
Well...
> I've just found the PAF digest info which defines the
> structure of a postcode, so I'll post my version of the regex
> shortly... :o)
I was bored over lunch, so came up with this little UDF to validate
postcodes. It checks that the postcode is generally well formatted
according to
Yep, I did..I was asking about what SQL Server he wants to protect... :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 January 2003 15:51
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] firewall
Neil - MS SQL Server 2000, you not hear about this? do a se
Yes there is a patch, but in some organisations you do not have the simple
ease of just downloading a patch or service pack and then installing it.
When you have millions of £'s of mission critical applications running on
these servers you have to test in a hived-off environment, even for the
small
... a half-decent, locked-down RedHat 8.0 Linux box running IPTables and
Shorewall, and some form of intrusion detection system == £0.00 in software.
Or get some form of personal firewall onto the SQL server (eg. Tiny Personal
Firewall, Zone Alarm Pro, Norton's one, etc.) and block by IP address.
Neil - MS SQL Server 2000, you not hear about this? do a search on
"slammer worm"
I like Sonicwall DMZ, although I suspect it might be an expensive one
Duncan Cumming
IT Manager
http://www.alienationdesign.co.uk
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 0141 575 9700
Fax: 0141 575 9600
Creative solution
> After this weekends lovely SQL attacks
BTW: for anyone who's running SQL server 2000, this vulnerability does have
a fix. The problem was found about 6 months ago and MS released fix info at
the time.
People have been talking about the need for firewalling it all over the
lists, but its not st
Which SQL Server?
-Original Message-
From: Snake Hollywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 January 2003 15:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ cf-dev ] firewall
After this weekends lovely SQL attacks, I think it's time to invest in a
firewall for the SQL servers and not give everyo
Then it's tough isn't it
> -Original Message-
> From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 January 2003 15:33
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Browser Stats etceducated guess?
>
>
> what if you are on a corporate network and the netwo
After this weekends lovely SQL attacks, I think it's time to invest in a
firewall for the SQL servers and not give everyone enterprise manager
access who isn't on a static IP address.
Any suggests on firewall products, pref not the stupidly expensive ones
like that Nokia at £11k
Russ
--
** Arc
what if you are on a corporate network and the network does not allow access
to these settings?
-Original Message-
From: Snake Hollywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 January 2003 15:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Browser Stats etceducated guess?
Any muppet wh
Any muppet who has IE6 and doesn't know to change the settings to accept
all cookies
> -Original Message-
> From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 January 2003 13:55
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [ cf-dev ] Browser Stats etceducated guess?
>
proxy or web server configured to force caching of requests?
- Peter
-Original Message-
From: Paul Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 January 2003 11:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ cf-dev ] OT: HTTP 304 error code
Just a quick question...
When does this come up? I have
> default is medium .. and it blocks cookies
>
> AFAIK
not quite correct, it does block cookies, but only cookies that originate
from 3rd party sites (eg doubleclick ads) that does not have a corresponding
p3p digital policy.
normal 1st party cookies are unaffected.
> -Original Message-
default is medium .. and it blocks cookies
AFAIK
At 13:59 27/01/2003 +, you wrote:
really? what level is that? Medium there seems to be a few settings in
IE6 for Cookies etc.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Horn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 January 2003 14:02
To: [EMAIL P
really? what level is that? Medium there seems to be a few settings in
IE6 for Cookies etc.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Horn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 January 2003 14:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] Browser Stats etceducated guess?
Luser who have IE
Luser who have IE 6 will have cookies restricted by Default
I hate that
At 13:55 27/01/2003 +, you wrote:
Hey,
I know this has been beaten to death etc, but anyone got any idea etc on
what the percentage could be of people who have cookeis off etc...? I know
you cannot do a true reading
Hey,
I know this has been beaten to death etc, but anyone got any idea etc on
what the percentage could be of people who have cookeis off etc...? I know
you cannot do a true reading but I am looking for peoples ideas from the
work they have done?
N
--
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/de
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 13:25:40 -, in gradwell.lists.cfdeveloper-dev
you wrote:
>We're doing a postcode lookup to autofill an address, but we need
>something to verify that a postcode is at least _syntactically_ valid if
>for some reason it's not in the PAF database.
/me notices that tim cannot
> As I say, a first stab to get the ball rolling. Tim asked for
> a PC validator: is that to validate that the Post Code
> actually exists, or validate it's structure so that it could
> possibly exist? You can't assume that the user enters in
> upper case, unless you force it before validating
> I agree, a straight look up would be more accurate. Perhaps
> there's a web service to check post codes.
there is - postcodeanywehere.co.uk
you can even get a dev account off them to test the service and I found them
quite helpful. Here's an example of how easy it is to check:
service ="
As I say, a first stab to get the ball rolling. Tim asked for a PC validator: is that
to validate that the Post Code actually exists, or validate it's structure so that it
could possibly exist? You can't assume that the user enters in upper case, unless you
force it before validating.
I agree,
Hmmm... Regex:
>
> This is a first stab at one...
>
> RegEx = ^[a-zA-Z]{1,2}[1-9]{1,2}[ ]{1}[1-9]{1,2}[a-zA-Z]{1,2}&
Wouldn't work for something like
SW1P
Which is a Westminster postcode
Adding this in it is slightly more complicated (and therefore more easy to
hack), Postcodes are always up
This is a first stab at one...
RegEx = ^[a-zA-Z]{1,2}[1-9]{1,2}[ ]{1}[1-9]{1,2}[a-zA-Z]{1,2}&
Douglas
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 January 2003 12:20
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Postcode validation
be good to
> Anyone got a regex or similar to validate UK postcodes?
>
> Ta.
Surely it would be easier to have a postcode lookup table... There are only
a finite number...
Anyway, check out royal mail for how postcodes are implemented
Paul
--
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeve
be good to have, esp. if it can handle the one letter one number ones
without failure.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Blair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 January 2003 12:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ cf-dev ] Postcode validation
Anyone got a regex or similar to validate UK post
Anyone got a regex or similar to validate UK postcodes?
Ta.
---
OUR NEW SITE IS NOW LIVE
Visit our new website at http://www.rawnet.com/ and
race around the beautiful Bracknell streets at
http://xmas.rawnet.com/
Anyone ever used protX with ColdFusion for their ecommerce systems?
Their com object wont work with CF and, you cannot use their remote
service with cfhhttp due to be requireing https connection which wont
work when cf runs as a service, so client needs another work around.
Russ
--
** Archive
Apologies for anyone who has this, but I remember a few threads about this :
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B234142
Always good to keep handy!
Neil
--
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
F
Just a quick question...
When does this come up? I have checked w3.org and it says that when the
client sends a:
If-Modified-Since:
Header in the request, it will respond with a 304 if the page has not been
modified since that date. This is useful for caching except, that I am
getting this re
Hi all
I am currently looking at using Soundex or similar for an upcoming project.
I stumbled upon this:
http://www.planet-source-code.com/vb/scripts/ShowCode.asp?txtCodeId=519&lngW
Id=5
I think I like it, but it doesn't support accented vowels (I don't think -
just looking through the code). Ha
81 matches
Mail list logo
