Snake Hollywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 August 2004 11:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Comments!
Actually that's not strictly true. There is no need to lock only for
certain conditions. Race conditions still apply.
Russ
> -Original Message-
> From
'
> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Comments!
>
> If you are on MX you don't *need* to lock these vars...it is
> still good practice but you don't need to..
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
Hi Justin,
Yeah I was alittle confused about and its uses.
I guess I should wrap it up properly.
Thanks
Regards - Paul
From: Justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] Comments!
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 14:37:50 +0100
L
If you are on MX you don't *need* to lock these vars...it is still good
practice but you don't need to..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 August 2004 14:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] Comments!
can be rewritte
MAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] Comments!
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 14:30:08 +0100
can be rewritten to
[or even !]
likewise
becomes
You need to lock the reference to an Application variable:
DATASOURCE= "#application.dsn#">
or use Request.dsn instead.
Otherwise...
Looks fine, however you may want to wrap the queries in cftransactions.
Also it would be better to use a variable for your destination in your
cfuploads.
Finally you should use
Justin
On Aug 3, 2004, at 2:24 PM, Paul Swingewood wrote:
Ok I think I have cracked this next phase for the backend of
tmail.com> cc:
Subject: [ cf-dev ] Comments!
Ok I think I have cracked this next phase for the backend of my shoes
application.
I would appreciate any comments on this code. Is this the right way to do it
etc .
Just to let you know this is the modify action page which modifies items
.
Regards - Paul
filefield ="modifiedb
