On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:52:27PM -0500, Isaac David wrote:
> gosh, do I hate top-posting.
Sorry, I'll be better.
--
--
my GPG Public Key: https://files.grapentin.org/.gpg/public.key
--
Le jeu. 18 mai 2017 à 14:27, Megver83 a écrit :
the MPL
Andreas Grapentin:
do you mean the MPL or the ruby license?
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 06:08:00PM +, Megver83 wrote:
Andreas, can you make a list of all packages with this license?
why though? we literally just need to wait for A
s...@psylo.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be
out-of-date:
The user provided the following additional text:
The [nonprism] version is out of date (3.22.2-1 vs. [extra]'s 3.24.2-1). The
version mismatch between it and other GNOME components causes GNOME to be
unlaunch
On 05/18/2017 09:35 AM, Andreas Grapentin wrote:
> what are the significant differences between grsec and hardened?
> if there are none, or they are negligible, I approve of this, assuming
> we come up with a good upgrade strategy for those who use grsec.
>
> -A
For now running LTS + grsec patches
the MPL
Andreas Grapentin:
>
> do you mean the MPL or the ruby license?
>
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 06:08:00PM +, Megver83 wrote:
>> Andreas, can you make a list of all packages with this license? Only the
>> Parabola ones, Arch ones are not under our control.
>>
>> Dima, did you also adv
This is Why I say we should remove it, but IDK if there's someone who
still wants to keep it, in that case it can be moved to [kernels], but
we would just let it there rotting.
Marcel Röthke:
> On 18.05.2017 15:26, Megver83 wrote:
>> We can have both kernels too, …
>
> How?
> The patches are not
For the one in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, there'll be a
recording. Unfortunatelly I don't know about the others so far.
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.parabola.nu
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
do you mean the MPL or the ruby license?
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 06:08:00PM +, Megver83 wrote:
> Andreas, can you make a list of all packages with this license? Only the
> Parabola ones, Arch ones are not under our control.
>
> Dima, did you also advised in Arch's Mailing lists?
>
> Dima U
Andreas, can you make a list of all packages with this license? Only the
Parabola ones, Arch ones are not under our control.
Dima, did you also advised in Arch's Mailing lists?
Dima Ursu:
> The licenses package has and outdated link to MPL, which returns 404.
>
> The correct link is now - https:
So near from Chile, but not in Chile :P
Are there going to be live transmissions? To watch him in real time.
Adonay Felipe Nogueira:
> Richard Stallman needs no introduction... but here is one anyway!
> Richard Stallman is the author of the GNU GPL, founded the Free Software
> Foundation, and star
Le mer. 17 mai 2017 à 8:18, Dima Ursu a écrit :
The licenses package has and outdated link to MPL, which returns 404.
The correct link is now -
https://www.mozilla.org/media/MPL/1.1/index.txt
this is better directed at Arch:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/49174
Also, the checksum for the r
> what are the significant differences between grsec and hardened?
Most grsecurity features will not be available, notably RAP, hide symbols,
hide proc, hide sys, and module hardening. Perhaps one day they will.
A list of their upstreaming progress can be found here:
https://github.com/thestinger/
The licenses package has and outdated link to MPL, which returns 404.
The correct link is now - https://www.mozilla.org/media/MPL/1.1/index.txt
Also, the checksum for the ruby license is failing.
Dima.
--
Free Software Activist
Engineer @ Tehnoetic
https://tehnoetic.com
__
Richard Stallman needs no introduction... but here is one anyway!
Richard Stallman is the author of the GNU GPL, founded the Free Software
Foundation, and started the development of the GNU operating system
(including GNU Emacs, GCC, the coreutils, etc.), which we and tens of
millions of GNU/Linux
On 18.05.2017 15:26, Megver83 wrote:
> We can have both kernels too, …
How?
The patches are not publicly available anymore, that's why arch dropped
the kernel. Continuing to use the current version is probably not a good
idea, since patches for non LTS kernels where afaik never considered
stable b
The main difference is that grsecurity it is no longer free to the
public -->
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=GrSecurity-No-Longer-Free
You can read --> https://grsecurity.net/passing_the_baton_faq.php
"4.9 was specifically chosen as the last public release"
And that's the versi
what are the significant differences between grsec and hardened?
if there are none, or they are negligible, I approve of this, assuming
we come up with a good upgrade strategy for those who use grsec.
-A
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 01:26:00PM +, Megver83 wrote:
> Hi, as most of us may know, Arch
Hi, as most of us may know, Arch Linux removed linux-grsec from their
repositories. Now they have a linux-hardened kernel in their [community]
repository, so I was thinking on why not having a linux-libre-hardened
kernel that replaces the grsec one.
We can have both kernels too, but as Parabola So
18 matches
Mail list logo
