[Dev] [PKGBUILD][PATCH] Update Prosody Modules

2023-11-08 Thread Wael Karram
Updated to compile against Prosody 0.12.4. -- Kind Regards, Wael Karram. From 558c8d31ebbac82b28469ee54280545ae5b43001 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wael Karram Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:24:24 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Updated Prosody Modules. For prosody 0.12.4 --- pcr/prosody-modules-hg/PKGB

Re: [Dev] [PKGBUILD][PATCH][UPDATE] Prosody Modules 0.12.3

2023-07-09 Thread bill-auger
this is what i am suggesting - note how much smaller the comment has shrunk - that is generally a good smell diff --git a/pcr/prosody-modules/PKGBUILD b/pcr/prosody-modules/PKGBUILD index e95ed62c1..29a3b983e 100644 --- a/pcr/prosody-modules/PKGBUILD +++ b/pcr/prosody-modules/PKGBUILD @@ -3,51 +3

Re: [Dev] [PKGBUILD][PATCH][UPDATE] Prosody Modules 0.12.3

2023-07-09 Thread bill-auger
On Sun, 09 Jul 2023 12:08:30 +0300 Wael wrote: > Hence, the upstream doesn't have proper releases as such and tagging cannot be > done. tagging is always possible - it takes only seconds - i would ask the upstream to do it, and i would probably reject their software if they refused per that descr

Re: [Dev] [PKGBUILD][PATCH][UPDATE] Prosody Modules 0.12.3

2023-07-09 Thread Wael Karram
On Sat, 2023-07-08 at 18:00 -0400, bill-auger wrote: > that comment in the PKGBUILD is confusing: > > # The prosody-modules repository doesn't have tags that correspond to > > # the prosody releases. So we used the commit right before June 09 > > # to correspond to the prosody release. > > if the

Re: [Dev] [PKGBUILD][PATCH][UPDATE] Prosody Modules 0.12.3

2023-07-08 Thread bill-auger
i also set wael as the Maintainer instead of "parabola hackers" i think we should consider it a matter of policy not to accept anything into PCR without a dedicated maintainer - the reason is that most packages in PCR got there because a very small number of users requested them, perhaps only one

Re: [Dev] [PKGBUILD][PATCH][UPDATE] Prosody Modules 0.12.3

2023-07-08 Thread bill-auger
just wanted to point out a minor flaw in this PKGBUILD - looks like denis overlooked it originally the libre source-ball was defined without a file extension, and without requiring a signature - i made the change, just wanted to mention it - the file extension is inconsequential, but the signature

Re: [Dev] [PKGBUILD][PATCH][UPDATE] Prosody Modules 0.12.3

2023-07-08 Thread bill-auger
that comment in the PKGBUILD is confusing: > # The prosody-modules repository doesn't have tags that correspond to > # the prosody releases. So we used the commit right before June 09 > # to correspond to the prosody release. if the upstream does not tag the VCS properly, then where does pkgver='0

[Dev] [PKGBUILD][PATCH][UPDATE] Prosody Modules 0.12.3

2023-06-27 Thread Wael Karram
Hello, I've attached a patch for updating prosody-modules. -- Kind Regards, Wael Karram. From ad4feade8694b1dc374971e86a823d864f9d6a7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wael Karram Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:50:53 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Updated Prosody Modules --- pcr/prosody-modules/PKGBUILD |