Re: [Scilab-Dev] bug or feature

Le 22/03/2019 à 11:10, Stéphane Mottelet a écrit : Hello all, Do you think that the following behavior is a bug or a feature: --> x=1  x  =    1. --> x([])=[1,2,3]  x  =    1. ? Hello everyone, For me, it kind of makes sense not to change anything to X when assigning a value to X(ran

[Scilab-Dev] fftshift and ifftshift are way too different

Hello all, From what I understand of fast Fourier transforms, fftshift and ifftshift should be almost identical. The only difference is when there are an odd number of elements in the dimension along which the shift is performed (ie fftshift([1:4])==ifftshift([1:4]) but fftshift([1:5])!=ifftsh

Re: [Scilab-Dev] ?==?utf-8?q? Scilab 6.0.0 has been released !

Hi, Thanks for this good news. I think ironing out the most annoying bugs (like comments stopping code execution from scinotes) is crucial now that 6.0 is out of beta. That being said, I see the following as major improvements for the next version to come: - improve the help content. That's were

Re: [Scilab-Dev] slint() : remarks and suggestions

Le 04/19/2016 01:09 PM, Samuel Gougeon a écrit : Hello devs, The so-called /slint /module is a new experimental tool proposed and somewhat documented in Scilab master: http://www.scilab.org/fr/development/nightly_builds/master Scilab 6.0-b1 did not yet include it. slint is a Scilab code check

Re: [Scilab-Dev] [oldEmptyBehaviour()] displaying a warning message in both Scilab 5 and Scilab 6 behavior

Here is an honest question to the scilab team (Clement in particular): What is so important with this change that you cannot drop it? So far, it only seems to confuse or angry active developers and I can confirm that it occasionally confuse long time users like my self. I just tried to

Re: [Scilab-Dev] Scilab index type should be generalized

-- +++ Antoine Monmayrant LAAS - CNRS 7 avenue du Colonel Roche BP 54200 31031 TOULOUSE Cedex 4 FRANCE Tel:+33 5 61 33 64 59 email : antoine.monmayr...@laas.fr permanent email : antoine.monmayr...@polytechnique.org

Re: [Scilab-Dev] Release Scilab 6.0.0 alpha 2

es.com +33(0)1 80 77 04 60 http://www.scilab-enterprises.com -http://www.scilab.org ___ dev mailing list dev@lists.scilab.org http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/dev -- +++ Antoine Monmayra

Re: [Scilab-Dev] Input requested on a few behaviors for Scilab 6...

Le 10/02/2015 09:30 AM, Nicolas FEZANS a écrit : I think the first thing to consider is that the sign of the step always need to match the sign of the difference end-start. If not that is clearly an error. %inf and %nan are also errors when talking about such ranges Hi all, I don't really agree

Re: [Scilab-Dev] save(..) with internal timestamp? MD5 varying with unchanged content to be saved.

Le 06/10/2015 09:36 AM, Clément David a écrit : Hi Samuel, For the record, I checked and even if the md5sum of the two files are different, the h5diff tool does not report any difference. That's weird ! Not really, it is a hdf5 issue, not a scilab one: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1601

Re: [Scilab-Dev] Xcos debugging : 'redefining permanent variable'

On 07/15/2014 10:14 AM, Patrick - Digimetrie wrote: Hello, I'm the developper of this tool : https://atoms.scilab.org/toolboxes/digimetrie_Tools Hi Patrick, Sorry to hijack this discussion but I wanted to have a look at your module and products but it seems that your website ( http://www.di

[Scilab-Dev] Building scilab from source on Centos

Hi everyone, As we are affected by bug #12986 , we need to compile scilab 5.5.0 beta1 from source on Centos 5.10 workstations. Has anyone here ever tried compiling scilab on a Redhat system? Any simple way to get all the dependencies right (ie