Re: [VOTE] Release Livy 0.7.0 based on RC3

d here: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachelivy-1012 > > The list of resolved JIRAs in this release can be found here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LIVY/versions/12345179 > > Thanks > Saisai > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: Possible missing mentor(s)

o the roster. > > The IPMC will also do what it can to find extra mentors for those podling > that need them. > > Thanks, > Justin > (V.P. Incubator) > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: We're using Livy!

Zhang wrote: Hi JB, I notice the ticket of `decoupling` livy from spark. Which alternative engine do you consider to adopt ? Jean-Baptiste Onofré 于2019年4月17日周三 上午12:06写道： Hi Ryan, Thanks for the introduction e-mail and welcome ! While ago I already proposed some potential new features t

Re: We're using Livy!

Hi Ryan, Thanks for the introduction e-mail and welcome ! While ago I already proposed some potential new features to Livy. Especially I proposed to "decouple" Livy from Spark to be able to interact with different execution engines. I'm planning to move forward on Livy PoCs. Looking

Re: Why not a Top Level Project?

e have a Machine Learning Server that tries > to be compute engine neutral but practically speaking uses Spark and HDFS > for several algorithms. We would have a hard time scaling a service that > runs the Spark Driver in the server process. The solution may well be Livy. > > Here’s hoping Livy b

Re: GitHub emails on dev

San >> Francisco, CA 94105 >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=505+Howard+Street+San+Francisco,+CA+94105+United+States=gmail=g> >>> >>> United >> States >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=505+Howard+Street+San+Francisco,+CA+94105+United+States=gmail=g> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Marcelo >> >> >> >> >> -- > Sent from my Mobile device > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [DISCUSS] Getting rid of old stuff

line, > and it was dropped altogether in 2.2. > > We shouldn't remove support for multiple versions of Scala, though, > since 2.12 will be beta in Spark 2.4, and there will be a 2.13 at some > point. > > Thoughts? > > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: Podling report this month

Reviewed and signed off. Thanks ! Regards JB On 09/07/2018 04:17, Saisai Shao wrote: > Updated. Please review and sign off. > > Thanks > > Saisai Shao 于2018年7月9日周一 上午8:27写道： > >> Sorry I forgot about this, will draft this today. >> >> Thanks >> Saisa

Podling report this month

Hi guys, we have to report this month: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2018 Did someone already start a report ? I can bootstrap one if you want. Thanks, Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: Podling Report Reminder - April 2018

- > > Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on > the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are > following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms > for the Incubator PMC. > > Incubator PMC > > > > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: Development in Intellij IDEA

Yeah that's another step: I build and test using Maven. However the import works fine in intelliJ. Regards JB Le 14 mars 2018 à 17:55, à 17:55, Saisai Shao a écrit: >Like what Alex mentioned, due to the support of multi-version Scala in >one >project, we add some tricks

Re: Development in Intellij IDEA

Hi Alexey, let me try, I imported Livy in IntelliJ couple of weeks ago and I don't remember any issue. I keep you posted. Regards JB On 14/03/2018 14:38, Alexey Romanenko wrote: Hello all, I’m quite new with Livy and I have a question regarding Livy development using Intellij IDEA. I

Re: [DISCUSS] Add new "channels" to interact with the managed cluster and extend support cluster mode

apps over all transport types or things get confusing. So I'd like to understand exactly what's the advantage here before opening up that Pandora's box. On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 6:17 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: Hi guys, Currently, Livy provides a great "façade&quo

[DISCUSS] Add new "channels" to interact with the managed cluster and extend support cluster mode

Apex, ...) and backend (Yarn, Kubernetes, ...). The reason for those ideas is that basically I'm thinking about a Apache Beam pipelines dispenser powered partly by Livy ;) Thoughts ? Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Livy 0.4.0-incubating based on Livy 0.4.0 RC2

+1 as well. Regards JB On Aug 23, 2017, 17:04, at 17:04, Marcelo Vanzin wrote: >Just echoing my +1 from the Livy list. > >On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 12:33 AM, Jerry Shao wrote: >> Hello Incubator PMC’ers, >> >> The Apache Livy community has decided to