> Thanks
> Bikas
>
>
> From: Jeff Zhang
> Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 12:17 AM
> To: dev@livy.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Livy release
>
> Make sense for me.
>
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré 于2018年12月3日周一 下午11:27写道：
>
&
AM
To: dev@livy.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Livy release
Make sense for me.
Jean-Baptiste Onofré 于2018年12月3日周一 下午11:27写道：
> It sounds good to me for 0.6.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 03/12/2018 16:26, Marco Gaido wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > https://githu
in anticipation of the upcoming Spark 2.4.
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >>
> >> On 07/11/2018 22:59, Bikas Saha wrote:
> >>> It makes sense to wait for those PRs to be merged.
> >>>
> >>> Bikas
> >>>
> >>>
ime for a stable
>> release in anticipation of the upcoming Spark 2.4.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> On 07/11/2018 22:59, Bikas Saha wrote:
>>> It makes sense to wait for those PRs to be merged.
>>>
>>> Bikas
>>>
>>> _____
it for those PRs to be merged.
> >
> > Bikas
> >
> >
> > From: Marcelo Vanzin
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2018 12:01 PM
> > To: dev@livy.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: New Livy release
> >
> > I don't t
wrote:
> It makes sense to wait for those PRs to be merged.
>
> Bikas
>
>
> From: Marcelo Vanzin
> Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2018 12:01 PM
> To: dev@livy.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New Livy release
>
> I don't thin
It makes sense to wait for those PRs to be merged.
Bikas
From: Marcelo Vanzin
Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2018 12:01 PM
To: dev@livy.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Livy release
I don't think the JDBC part is ready for prime time yet.
At the very
I don't think the JDBC part is ready for prime time yet.
At the very least the following PRs need to be merged:
- https://github.com/apache/incubator-livy/pull/117 (haven't had the
time to go back to it)
- https://github.com/apache/incubator-livy/pull/118
Now if you leave the JDBC part disabled i
Hi all,
Given the Apache Spark 2.4 release and the resolution of LIVY-518, should we
trigger the next Apache Livy release so users have Spark 2.4 support. This
would also provide the first release vehicle for the JDBC support we recently
added.
Thoughts?
Bikas
