Why would you want to do that? Most people seem to prefer getLogger() while I
prefer getLogger(MyClass.class). I can’t imagine why anyone would want to
dynamically construct a name like that and if they did, why wouldn’t they just
using StringBuilder?
Ralph
> On Mar 9, 2020, at 7:51 AM, Gary
Hi All:
Any thought for or against adding the API 'getLogger(String... name)' which
would build a hierarchical logger name. These would be equivalent:
- getLogger("com.a.b.c")
- getLogger("com", "a", "b", "c")
Gary
I started testing this. It doesn’t handle daylight savings at all and some of
the tests make no sense. I’m rewriting it using java.time and implementing
better tests.
Ralph
> On Mar 8, 2020, at 11:19 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> Is anyone else having problems with TimeFilterTest in core today?
