[General] Logging Wiki

One thing that I've been doing over the holidays is to work more on the log4cxx website migration to Doxygen instead of Maven, and I came across the log4cxx wiki(that seems to have been migrated by infra): https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LOGGINGLOG4CXX/Home However, it seems to have a

Re: [General] Logging Wiki

What you do with the wiki is totally up to whoever is working on log4cxx. Ralph > On Dec 26, 2020, at 9:04 AM, Robert Middleton wrote: > > One thing that I've been doing over the holidays is to work more on > the log4cxx website migration to Doxygen instead of Maven, and I came > across the log

[log4cxx] Site / Release?

I have ported all of the documentation that is currently built with maven to Markdown to make it possible to generate the single site with Doxygen. You can see the results here: https://rm5248.com/log4cxx/apidocs/ Overall, this seems to be a much easier way to build the site and documentation, si

Re: [log4cxx] Site / Release?

If you aren’t already, just be aware that the web site is actually deployed from https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx-site following the instructions at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LOGGING/Managing+the+Logging+Services+Web+Sites in the section titled "Updating Logging Servi

Re: [log4cxx] Site / Release?

Guten Tag Robert Middleton, am Samstag, 26. Dezember 2020 um 19:10 schrieben Sie: > Thoughts? Do you really think the changes for 0.11.1 are worth it to do a release or do you only want to have a release testing+documenting the new release process with? I'm somewhat sure to try your changes on my

Re: [log4cxx] Site / Release?

The doxygen style is looking a bit old now - could we move to Doxygen + Breath + Sphinx? Here is a old resource walking through the process of integrating into CMake: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/clear-functional-c-documentation-with-sphinx-breathe-doxygen-cmake/