Those are good points. To me, the fact that 2.x will be around for a long time
is one of the main reasons why I even considered this idea. I’d like to hear
more from the community first, though.
—
Matt Sicker
> On Apr 17, 2022, at 15:42, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
>
> Thanks for raising this subje
Thanks for raising this subject Matt, I am certainly interested in porting
the plugin system in 3.x to 2.x for a very simple reason: because plugins
are broken in 2.x. Let me elaborate on this and some more:
1. I was working on LOG4J2-3082 (support external serializers, e.g.,
Jackson, in JTL
+1
I tested 0.13.0 on Ubuntu and Windows - all OK
On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 7:47 PM Thorsten Schöning
wrote:
> Guten Tag Robert Middleton,
> am Samstag, 16. April 2022 um 03:00 schrieben Sie:
>
> > This is a vote to release log4cxx 0.13.0.
>
> +1
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>
> Thorsten Schöning
On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 11:31 PM Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> Features only available in DI have been asked about in a couple different
> situations already in 2.x development.
Whatever those features may be, I think that "use 3.0" is a reasonable
reply ti such requests.
Jochen
--
Philosophy is use
