Re: [logging-log4j2] branch master updated: Add Lazy::pure for pure reified values

2022-11-17 Thread Matt Sicker
Oops, “reified” should say “memoized”. You get the idea. — Matt Sicker > On Nov 17, 2022, at 22:12, mattsic...@apache.org wrote: > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > mattsicker pushed a commit to branch master > in repository

Re: Broken build

2022-11-17 Thread Ralph Goers
I made that change to log4j-api-test and that fixed the problem. Ralph > On Nov 17, 2022, at 3:29 PM, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 at 23:23, Ralph Goers wrote: >> >> I ran mvn test -Dtest=LoggerTest and it still fails. > > In `release-2.x` JUnit 5 is configured with: > >

Re: Broken build

2022-11-17 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 at 23:23, Ralph Goers wrote: > > I ran mvn test -Dtest=LoggerTest and it still fails. In `release-2.x` JUnit 5 is configured with: junit.jupiter.execution.parallel.mode.default = concurrent In `master` we have: junit.jupiter.execution.parallel.mode.default = same_thread

Re: Broken build

2022-11-17 Thread Ralph Goers
I ran mvn test -Dtest=LoggerTest and it still fails. Ralph > On Nov 17, 2022, at 12:27 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > There’s a random seed value output for each run as the test order is > randomized. You can use the seed to replay a particular test ordering, though > if it’s a bug, it’ll still

Re: Broken build

2022-11-17 Thread Matt Sicker
There’s a random seed value output for each run as the test order is randomized. You can use the seed to replay a particular test ordering, though if it’s a bug, it’ll still likely only show up randomly. > On Nov 17, 2022, at 5:23 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > The stack bottom shows > >

Re: Broken build

2022-11-17 Thread Ralph Goers
I haven’t tried master recently. The failures I am seeing are in release-2.x. Ralph > On Nov 17, 2022, at 10:23 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz > wrote: > > Hi Gary, > > On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 at 12:24, Gary Gregory wrote: >> I hope we are not running tests in parallel or else how can we be reliable >>

Re: Broken build

2022-11-17 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
Hi Gary, On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 at 12:24, Gary Gregory wrote: > I hope we are not running tests in parallel or else how can we be reliable > and reproducible? And compare builds between developers? Yes, `log4j-api-test` is configured to run in parallel (at least in `master`). This setting has been

Re: Broken build

2022-11-17 Thread Gary D. Gregory
On Windows, I get: [INFO] Running org.apache.logging.log4j.status.StatusConsoleListenerTest [ERROR] Tests run: 41, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.042 s <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.logging.log4j.spi.MutableThreadContextStackTest [ERROR]

Re: Broken build

2022-11-17 Thread Apache
Consistent Ralph > On Nov 16, 2022, at 5:23 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > Is this a consistent failure or random? > >> On Nov 16, 2022, at 3:42 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: >> >> I haven’t run a build in a while and looking at the recent commits I am not >> sure what is causing this, but some

Re: Broken build

2022-11-17 Thread Gary Gregory
The stack bottom shows java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:157) I hope we are not running tests in parallel or else how can we be reliable and reproducible? And compare builds between developers? Gary On Wed, Nov 16, 2022, 19:23 Matt Sicker wrote: > Is