On Tue, Oct 24, 2023, at 22:30, Robert Middleton wrote:
> Those classes are to receive log events from a database table. Log4j1
> and log4cxx can write log messages directly to a database; I'm not
> sure about log4j2.
Yes, there is a JDBC Appender that is discussed more often these days
>
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023, at 22:19, Matt Sicker wrote:
> If you use Log4j in Chainsaw, you could set up a JDBC appender or
> similar to forward things along. The Flume appender could be useful
> there, too, but that sort of moves the database configuration into your
> Flume config.
I see - but
Those classes are to receive log events from a database table. Log4j1
and log4cxx can write log messages directly to a database; I'm not
sure about log4j2.
I'm not sure exactly what it does/how it does it, but it's going to
effectively do something like "SELECT * FROM Logs" and then pass those
If you use Log4j in Chainsaw, you could set up a JDBC appender or similar to
forward things along. The Flume appender could be useful there, too, but that
sort of moves the database configuration into your Flume config.
> On Oct 24, 2023, at 3:14 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> in
Hi,
in this package:
org.apache.log4j.db
all classes are commented. I am tempted to just remove it in full, but I am not
sure what i was supposed to do.
Docs read:
"Provides means to append logging events into various databases."
Does that mean, Chainsaw would collect logs and then send it
Pin it good!
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023, 2:04 PM Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> I'd like to pin this post in case somebody wants to add yet another manual
> step to the release instructions.
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 1:58 PM Piotr P. Karwasz
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Gary,
> >
> > On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 at
I'd like to pin this post in case somebody wants to add yet another manual
step to the release instructions.
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 1:58 PM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 at 13:41, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
> >
> > Odd, I do not even see 2.21.1 on
>
Ah! ;-)
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023, 7:58 AM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 at 13:41, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
> >
> > Odd, I do not even see 2.21.1 on
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/public/org/apache/logging/log4j/log4j-api/
> >
> > ?
>
> I have forgotten
Hi Gary,
On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 at 13:41, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
>
> Odd, I do not even see 2.21.1 on
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/public/org/apache/logging/log4j/log4j-api/
>
> ?
I have forgotten about one step of the release process. ;-)
Piotr
Odd, I do not even see 2.21.1 on
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/public/org/apache/logging/log4j/log4j-api/
?
Gary
On 2023/10/24 11:21:01 "Gary D. Gregory" wrote:
> Please do not announce before the jars show up on
>
Please do not announce before the jars show up on
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/logging/log4j/log4j-api/
TY!
Gary
On 2023/10/24 07:06:12 "Piotr P. Karwasz" wrote:
> Apache Log4j team is pleased to announce the 2.21.1
> release. Apache Log4j is a versatile, industrial-strength
> Java
Blow up -> become very large, not corrupted.
Gary
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023, 6:45 AM Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> Let me elaborate on what I want to achieve with CI automation.
>
> *[I will focus on Log4j, but my statements apply to other Maven-based
> products as well; Log4j Tools, Log4j Kotlin, etc.]*
Let me elaborate on what I want to achieve with CI automation.
*[I will focus on Log4j, but my statements apply to other Maven-based
products as well; Log4j Tools, Log4j Kotlin, etc.]*
1. When a new Log4j `release/A.B.C` branch is detected, `logging
*-log4j-A_B_C.staged*.apache.org` will
Apache Log4j team is pleased to announce the 2.21.1
release. Apache Log4j is a versatile, industrial-strength
Java logging framework composed of an API, its implementation,
and components to assist the deployment for various use cases.
For further information (support, download, etc.) see the
Adding my +1.
With that, the release passes with 3 binding +1 votes from Gary
Gregory, Volkan Yazıcı, and me. An additional non-binding +1 was cast
by Fritz Lumnitz.
I will therefore continue the release process.
Piotr
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 23:20, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote:
>
> This is a vote
15 matches
Mail list logo
