[ANNOUNCE] Apache Log4j 2.21.0 released

2023-10-16 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Apache Log4j team is pleased to announce the 2.21.0 release. Apache Log4j is a versatile, industrial-strength Java logging framework composed of an API, its implementation, and components to assist the deployment for various use cases. For further information (support, download, etc.) see the proje

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Log4j 2.21.0 released

2023-10-16 Thread Gary Gregory
Thank you for RM'ing Christian! Gary On Mon, Oct 16, 2023, 4:28 PM Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Apache Log4j team is pleased to announce the 2.21.0 > release. Apache Log4j is a versatile, industrial-strength > Java logging framework composed of an API, its implementation, > and components to

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Log4j 2.21.0 released

2023-10-17 Thread Gary Gregory
I got hit at work with the loss of log4j-jmx-gui. Is log4j-jmx-gui 2.20.0 compatible with log4j 2.21.0? Gary On Mon, Oct 16, 2023, 5:59 PM Gary Gregory wrote: > Thank you for RM'ing Christian! > > Gary > > > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023, 4:28 PM Christian Grobmeier > wrote: > >> Apache Log4j team i

Log4j JMX GUI (was: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Log4j 2.21.0 released)

2023-10-17 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
Hi Gary, On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 12:37, Gary Gregory wrote: > > I got hit at work with the loss of log4j-jmx-gui. Is log4j-jmx-gui 2.20.0 > compatible with log4j 2.21.0? Yes, it is, but there should be a `log4j-jmx-gui` version 2.21.0 out there: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-jmx-gui/re

Re: Log4j JMX GUI (was: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Log4j 2.21.0 released)

2023-10-17 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
Hi all, On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 13:13, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 12:37, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > I got hit at work with the loss of log4j-jmx-gui. Is log4j-jmx-gui 2.20.0 > > compatible with log4j 2.21.0? > > Yes, it is, but there should be a `log4j-jmx-gui` version 2.21

Re: Log4j JMX GUI (was: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Log4j 2.21.0 released)

2023-10-17 Thread Apache
Yes Ralph > On Oct 17, 2023, at 4:31 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > > Hi all, > >> On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 13:13, Piotr P. Karwasz >> wrote: >>> On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 12:37, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> >>> I got hit at work with the loss of log4j-jmx-gui. Is log4j-jmx-gui 2.20.0 >>> compatible

Re: Log4j JMX GUI (was: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Log4j 2.21.0 released)

2023-10-17 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
Hi Ralph, On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 13:58, Apache wrote: > > Yes > > Ralph Same release number or 2.21.1? The `rel/2.21.0` tag on the repository was already used by the faulty release. Piotr > > > On Oct 17, 2023, at 4:31 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz > > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > >> On Tue, 17 Oct

Re: Log4j JMX GUI (was: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Log4j 2.21.0 released)

2023-10-17 Thread Ralph Goers
Well, you cannot reuse the tag since you have to modify the pom.xml. You could go with 2.21.0.1. Ralph > On Oct 17, 2023, at 5:24 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > > Hi Ralph, > > On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 13:58, Apache wrote: >> >> Yes >> >> Ralph > > Same release number or 2.21.1? The `rel/2.2

Re: Log4j JMX GUI (was: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Log4j 2.21.0 released)

2023-10-17 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
Please don't! The entire versioning scheme in the IT universe is already sophisticated enough. Let's stick to the good old school `major.minor.patch` convention that every person and tool understands. I support Piotr's `2.21.1` proposal, since this is a "patch" for those who download a GUI tool fr

Re: Log4j JMX GUI (was: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Log4j 2.21.0 released)

2023-10-17 Thread Gary Gregory
I am OK with either version but the m.m.m one seems better to me. Gary On Tue, Oct 17, 2023, 3:54 PM Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > Please don't! The entire versioning scheme in the IT universe is > already sophisticated enough. Let's stick to the good old school > `major.minor.patch` convention that e