Apache Log4j team is pleased to announce the 2.21.0
release. Apache Log4j is a versatile, industrial-strength
Java logging framework composed of an API, its implementation,
and components to assist the deployment for various use cases.
For further information (support, download, etc.) see the proje
Thank you for RM'ing Christian!
Gary
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023, 4:28 PM Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Apache Log4j team is pleased to announce the 2.21.0
> release. Apache Log4j is a versatile, industrial-strength
> Java logging framework composed of an API, its implementation,
> and components to
I got hit at work with the loss of log4j-jmx-gui. Is log4j-jmx-gui 2.20.0
compatible with log4j 2.21.0?
Gary
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023, 5:59 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
> Thank you for RM'ing Christian!
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023, 4:28 PM Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>
>> Apache Log4j team i
Hi Gary,
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 12:37, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I got hit at work with the loss of log4j-jmx-gui. Is log4j-jmx-gui 2.20.0
> compatible with log4j 2.21.0?
Yes, it is, but there should be a `log4j-jmx-gui` version 2.21.0 out there:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-jmx-gui/re
Hi all,
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 13:13, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 12:37, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > I got hit at work with the loss of log4j-jmx-gui. Is log4j-jmx-gui 2.20.0
> > compatible with log4j 2.21.0?
>
> Yes, it is, but there should be a `log4j-jmx-gui` version 2.21
Yes
Ralph
> On Oct 17, 2023, at 4:31 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>> On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 13:13, Piotr P. Karwasz
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 12:37, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>>
>>> I got hit at work with the loss of log4j-jmx-gui. Is log4j-jmx-gui 2.20.0
>>> compatible
Hi Ralph,
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 13:58, Apache wrote:
>
> Yes
>
> Ralph
Same release number or 2.21.1? The `rel/2.21.0` tag on the repository
was already used by the faulty release.
Piotr
>
> > On Oct 17, 2023, at 4:31 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> >> On Tue, 17 Oct
Well, you cannot reuse the tag since you have to modify the pom.xml. You could
go with 2.21.0.1.
Ralph
> On Oct 17, 2023, at 5:24 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote:
>
> Hi Ralph,
>
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 13:58, Apache wrote:
>>
>> Yes
>>
>> Ralph
>
> Same release number or 2.21.1? The `rel/2.2
Please don't! The entire versioning scheme in the IT universe is
already sophisticated enough. Let's stick to the good old school
`major.minor.patch` convention that every person and tool understands.
I support Piotr's `2.21.1` proposal, since this is a "patch" for those
who download a GUI tool fr
I am OK with either version but the m.m.m one seems better to me.
Gary
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023, 3:54 PM Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> Please don't! The entire versioning scheme in the IT universe is
> already sophisticated enough. Let's stick to the good old school
> `major.minor.patch` convention that e
10 matches
Mail list logo