On 28 Jan 2018 11:45 a.m., "Stefan Bodewig" wrote:
On 2018-01-21, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> Sometimes it is possible to configure the test runner so that it runs in
> process instead of spawning a new process. Would you like to investigate
on
> this?
I don't see any such option. We could re-enab
On 2018-01-21, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> Sometimes it is possible to configure the test runner so that it runs in
> process instead of spawning a new process. Would you like to investigate on
> this?
I don't see any such option. We could re-enable more detailed logging
and try to figure out which
Sometimes it is possible to configure the test runner so that it runs in
process instead of spawning a new process. Would you like to investigate on
this? I had contact to Rob Prouse of the nunit developers. It might be a
good idea to crosspost to nunit-discuss.
On 21 Jan 2018 11:21 a.m., "Stefan
On 2018-01-20, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> I have disabled the test conditionallly on Linux and the Jenkins build
> now finishes the tests on Linux.
But not reliably, there seems to be another test that crashes the test
runner from time to time.
https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/content/pr
On 2018-01-20, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> it looks as if exclusive locking didn't work properly for
> RollingfileAppender on Linux for our NET Core tests. This has also
> been true for the MONO_2_0 builds ages ago. I haven't checked whether
> we are hitting a known limitation so far.
https://github.
Hi all
it looks as if exclusive locking didn't work properly for
RollingfileAppender on Linux for our NET Core tests. This has also been
true for the MONO_2_0 builds ages ago. I haven't checked whether we are
hitting a known limitation so far.
I have disabled the test conditionallly on Linux and
