[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-2574.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 980654 (3x).
Committed revision 980656 (trunk).
> Optimize c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893928#action_12893928
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2573:
---
I'm not 100% sure, I need to review the cod
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893911#action_12893911
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2558:
--
I'm implementing a basic doc id itera
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893891#action_12893891
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2573:
--
Is DocumentsWriterRAMAllocator.numByt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1402.
Resolution: Duplicate
I'm going to go ahead and mark this as a dup since SOLR-397 has already
implemented a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1240.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 980610. - 3x branch merge
this merge involved a lot of extra merging f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-397.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 980604. - merged to 3x branch
> options for dealing with range endpoints
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893835#action_12893835
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1240:
Committed revision 980592 - trunk typo fix
> Numerical Ran
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893831#action_12893831
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1410:
--
I'm sorry that there is no code yet for a bet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-397:
--
Fix Version/s: 3.1
> options for dealing with range endpoints in date facets
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man reopened SOLR-397:
---
reopening to track backport to 3x
> options for dealing with range endpoints in date facets
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893804#action_12893804
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1240:
Ah ... ok, the problem is that i never merged SOLR-397 to 3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893802#action_12893802
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1240:
FYI: still planning on back merge this to 3x, but there wer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893799#action_12893799
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1240:
Committed revision 980555. - trunk
> Numerical Range facet
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 06:16:42PM -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> : First, I think we should add the incubation disclaimer to the main wiki
> page.
>
> +1
Done.
> : I'm thinking of these pages in particular, as it might make sense to bundle
> : them with the distro some day and we need to mak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893789#action_12893789
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2573:
---
bq. Michael, DWPT.numBytesUsed isn't curren
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893757#action_12893757
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2573:
--
Michael, DWPT.numBytesUsed isn't curr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893755#action_12893755
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2016:
+1
> textTight uses loose matching
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893713#action_12893713
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2574:
Ahhh you're right, OK, excellent!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893710#action_12893710
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2574:
I think it borrows the impl from SimpleFSIndexInp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1410:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1410.patch
Attached patch, just modernizing and merging all prior
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893707#action_12893707
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2573:
--
So yeah I'll work on a patch for this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893702#action_12893702
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2573:
--
Michael, I could, I was working on th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893698#action_12893698
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2574:
Patch looks good Shai!
It looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893693#action_12893693
]
Russell Teabeault commented on SOLR-1352:
-
Ok. The package of SolrQueryResponse cha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893683#action_12893683
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2573:
---
Jason, are you still up for working on a pa
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> (aside: Solr seems to close the IW whenever it autoCommits? Is
> that true?)
Yeah, the update handler logic is old, and predates the ability of IW
to commit and handle more of it's own concurrency.
We need to relax some of the lockin
Hi Karl,
Can you post the original merge failure? A merge failure should not
corrupt the index and shouldn't cause spinning.
And can you run CheckIndex and post that output, and also the AIOOBE
you hit for certain searches?
Your first thread dumps shows one thread waiting the for the commit to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893660#action_12893660
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2020:
Also see HttpCommComponent below Solr's SearchHandl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893658#action_12893658
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2020:
Thanks! It will be nice to not be stuck on the old
Unfortunately, this theory goes out the window because I discovered other char
243's in the data prior to the one that apparently corrupts the index.
I'd love to work with someone here who has better knowldge of indexreader and
indexwriter classes. I could potentially post the data itself but t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893619#action_12893619
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2558:
--
{quote}Resolving deleted terms -> doc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893617#action_12893617
]
Jason Rutherglen edited comment on LUCENE-2312 at 7/29/10 9:57 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893617#action_12893617
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2312:
--
{quote}Note that many queries don't n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893615#action_12893615
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2575:
--
{quote}Where is there a concurrency p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2578:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2578.patch
Attached patch.
The only bizzare thing is... somehow,
Fine by me - but would be nice if we didn't have false failures all the
same ;) I might try and look at it if the mood strikes.
On 7/29/10 6:11 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
> This one is a known issue (LUCENE-2118).
>
> I'm not worried about it; there seems to be some corner as you tweak
> maxBu
cutover FunctionQuery tests to use RandomIndexWriter, for better testing
Key: LUCENE-2578
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2578
Project: Lucene - Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2559.
Fix Version/s: 3.1
4.0
Resolution: Fixed
> reopen suppor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893603#action_12893603
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2559:
This looks good! I'll commit sho
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-2559:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> reopen support for SegmentReader
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-1873:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1873.patch
Here is that patch with the tests - it may still time out on reconnect for y
SpanNearQuery inconsistency: should it accept less than 2 clauses or not?
-
Key: LUCENE-2577
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2577
Project: Lucene - Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Santiago M. Mola updated LUCENE-2577:
-
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> SpanNearQuery inconsistency: should it accept less than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893579#action_12893579
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2558:
Resolving deleted terms -> doc ID
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2576:
---
Description:
Mark's while(1) hudson box found this failure (and I can repro it too):
Intermittent failure in TestIndexWriter.testCommitThreadSafety
--
Key: LUCENE-2576
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2576
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
I opened LUCENE-2576 for this one.
Mike
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Error Message
>
> MockRAMDirectory: cannot close: there are still open files: {_1m.cfs=1,
> _1k.cfs=1, _14.cfs=1, _1g.cfs=1, _1h.cfs=1, _1f.cfs=1, _1n.cfs=1,
> _1i.cfs=1, _1j.cfs=1, _1l.cfs=1}
>
> Stack
This one is a known issue (LUCENE-2118).
I'm not worried about it; there seems to be some corner as you tweak
maxBufferedDocs case whereby the MP is able to leave 10 segments on a
single level (when mergeFactor is 10).
Mike
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Error Message
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893570#action_12893570
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2312:
Note that many queries don't need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12893564#action_12893564
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2575:
Logically, every term has its own
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chantal Ackermann updated SOLR-2020:
Attachment: HttpComponentsSolrServerTest.java
Tests GET and POST, but not multipart POST.
>
OK I committed a fix for this one.
The test was failing to close its IW, and so its IW was carrying along
continuing merging such that where we re-install Standard codec in
LuceneTestCase, if a merge kicks in right at that point, completes,
and then another merge tries to run, you'd get the except
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2574:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2574.patch
Patch adds copyBytes to IndexInput and overrides in RAM and FS classes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chantal Ackermann updated SOLR-2020:
Attachment: HttpComponentsSolrServer.java
Complete implementation that works for GET and is
HttpComponentsSolrServer
Key: SOLR-2020
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2020
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: clients - java
Affects Versions: 1.4.1
Environment
Hi Hoss,
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 04:45 +0200, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> : is there already someone working or using an implementation of
> : SolrServer that uses Http Components (http://hc.apache.org/) ?
>
> I think the lack of reply is the answer to your question.
Thanks for the confirmation. :-)
57 matches
Mail list logo
