thank you.
2010/11/8 Uwe Schindler :
> You have to also use Solr 4.0 :-)
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Li Li [mailto:fancye...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, November 08, 2
question about svn structure of lucene
I visit http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/
it contains many things
..
.htaccess
board-reports/
dev/
java/
lucene.net/
mahout/
openrelevance/
pylucene/
sandbox/
site/
solr/
I just want to use lucene/java + solr. what directories should I check out?
it see
Apache Lucene and Apache Solr merged to one checkout at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/
The combined version now share the same version numbers:
Lucene 3.x:
- http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch3.x
Lucene trunk:
- http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tru
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> No updates on the Hudson issue until now. What should we do? Disable Clover
> report generation for now?
>
+1 - test / CI-Build success are more important to me!
> I have no idea, what else we could do.
>
> Uwe
>
> ---
> Uwe Schindler
> Generi
-1 For succeeding tests we have running and working builds. For me the clover
report is more important, and that one works!
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> -1 For succeeding tests we have running and working builds. For me the clover
> report is more important, and that one works!
>
Ah you are right we have other builds - still confuses me, nevermind.
But I disagree that a broken clover is impo
Clover is not broken, only Hudson plugin that links the clover report in the
workspace. And it is important to have at least one version of the clover
report. I use it quite often to verify coverage.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...
We got some response for our Clover Hudson issue bug (see attached mail).
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Monday, November
Some questions:
@Grant: Can you clarify what you mean with "the Sinusoidal projection is
broken"?
Would it be possible to use a LGPL library like the Java Topology Suite
(JTS: http://www.vividsolutions.com/jts/JTSHome.htm)?
Neo4j is using JTS for creating a spatial index (code is here:
https://g
Hi,
I'll jump in and give my opinion:
Can you clarify what you mean with "the Sinusoidal projection is broken"?
>
Inside Spatial Lucene's Cartesian codebase is an implementation of
Sinusoidal projection. Grant discovered while working on improving the
testing coverage of the code that the imple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929556#action_12929556
]
M Alexander commented on LUCENE-2745:
-
{quote}
I think that ArabicLetterTokenizer, whi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
M Alexander closed LUCENE-2745.
---
Resolution: Later
Will wait for the relaese, which should have the solution within
> ArabicAnalyzer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929558#action_12929558
]
M Alexander commented on LUCENE-2745:
-
Oh, do you have a rough timing of the branch_3X
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929560#action_12929560
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2167:
-
{quote}
In theory, you should just feed initial
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929566#action_12929566
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2745:
-
bq. Oh, do you have a rough timing of the branc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929567#action_12929567
]
George Aroush commented on LUCENENET-380:
-
Few points:
1) Work on ASF projects
Merge duplicates documents with uniqueKey
-
Key: SOLR-
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.4.1
Reporter: Andreas L
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929574#action_12929574
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on SOLR-:
--
I think this is expected behavior because Solr
> Neo4j is using JTS for creating a spatial index (code is here:
> https://github.com/neo4j/neo4j-spatial)...
> (I've just seen that JTS has some index creation classes, but I'm not at all
> familiar with them)
JTS does not have a spatial index -- it is good for spatial operations
(check if some s
Hi All,
FYI, Apache SIS [1], currently Incubating, is working on building an ASLv2
licensed library comparable to JTS or GeoTools. You'll notice that most of the
GIS related libs out there are GPL or LGPL (or at least I did), so I decided to
do something about it.
If anyone else is interested
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>> -1 For succeeding tests we have running and working builds. For me the
>> clover report is more important, and that one works!
>>
> Ah you are right we have other builds - still conf
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929577#action_12929577
]
Andreas Laager commented on SOLR-:
--
I've read this that Lucene does not care about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929587#action_12929587
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2167:
-
bq. No thanks, i dont want to read my e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929590#action_12929590
]
Peter Karich commented on SOLR-792:
---
Hi Toke and all,
maybe I am a bit evil or stupid but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929594#action_12929594
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2167:
-
{quote}
This is obvious. And that's why I was t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929596#action_12929596
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-792:
--
Hi Peter,
I like to think of it as "What if" fa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929601#action_12929601
]
Peter Karich commented on SOLR-792:
---
Hi Grant,
ah, ok I see. Thanks for the explanation!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929606#action_12929606
]
Toke Eskildsen commented on SOLR-792:
-
I'd be interested to hear what the focus of SOLR-7
Implement PMC Branding Guidelines
-
Key: LUCENE-2746
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2746
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
Assi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-2746:
Attachment: LUCENE-2746.patch
Work in the guidelines.
> Implement PMC Branding Guidelines
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929622#action_12929622
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENENET-379:
---
Please see https://issues.apache.
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/1135/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedOptimize.testThreadedOptimize
Error Message:
expected:<248> but was:<256>
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<248> but was:<256
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929629#action_12929629
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
I'm running test-core multiple times
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/1137/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.CloudStateUpdateTest.testCoreRegistration
Error Message:
expected:<2> but was:<3>
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<2> but was:<3>
Any updates/progress with this?
I'm looking at ways to implement an RTree with lucene -- and this
discussion seems relevant
thanks
ryan
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 5:42 PM, mark harwood wrote:
>>>Both these on disk data structures and the ones in a B+ tree have seek
>>>offsets
>>>into files
>>>th
I came to the conclusion that the transient meaning of document ids is too
deeply ingrained in Lucene's design to use them to underpin any reliable
linking.
While it might work for relatively static indexes, any index with a reasonable
number of updates or deletes will invalidate any stored docu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929702#action_12929702
]
John Wang commented on LUCENE-2729:
---
zoie does not touch index files, only adds an index
Deprecate/remove language-specific tokenizers in favor of StandardTokenizer
---
Key: LUCENE-2747
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2747
Project: Lucene - Java
On Monday 08 November 2010 20:03:59 Ryan McKinley wrote:
> Any updates/progress with this?
>
> I'm looking at ways to implement an RTree with lucene -- and this
> discussion seems relevant
Did you consider merging the bits of each dimension into a NumericField?
For example: one dimension a0 a1 .
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Paul Elschot wrote:
> On Monday 08 November 2010 20:03:59 Ryan McKinley wrote:
>> Any updates/progress with this?
>>
>> I'm looking at ways to implement an RTree with lucene -- and this
>> discussion seems relevant
>
> Did you consider merging the bits of each dimen
Separate out "generic" Solr site from release specific content.
---
Key: SOLR-2223
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2223
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Task
Re
Convert all Lucene web properties to use the ASF CMS
Key: LUCENE-2748
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2748
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Gr
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:52 PM, mark harwood wrote:
> I came to the conclusion that the transient meaning of document ids is too
> deeply ingrained in Lucene's design to use them to underpin any reliable
> linking.
What about if we define an id field (like in solr)?
Whatever does the traversal w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929725#action_12929725
]
Aaron Powell commented on LUCENENET-380:
George,
The reason I spun up the exter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2747:
Attachment: LUCENE-2747.patch
here's a quick stab at a patch.
I had to add at least minimal suppo
On Monday 08 November 2010 21:34:18 Ryan McKinley wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Paul Elschot wrote:
> > On Monday 08 November 2010 20:03:59 Ryan McKinley wrote:
> >> Any updates/progress with this?
> >>
> >> I'm looking at ways to implement an RTree with lucene -- and this
> >> discussi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929737#action_12929737
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2747:
---
CharFilter must at least also implement rea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929738#action_12929738
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2747:
-
bq. CharFilter must at least also implement rea
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/1145/
4 tests failed.
FAILED:
junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.lucene.search.TestNumericRangeQuery64
Error Message:
this writer hit an OutOfMemoryError; cannot complete optimize
Stack Trace:
java.lang.IllegalStateExce
Lexically sorted shingle filter
---
Key: LUCENE-2749
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2749
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Analysis
Affects Versions: 3.1,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2680:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2680.patch
Here's a cleaned up patch, please take a look. I ran 'ant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929760#action_12929760
]
Peter Karich commented on SOLR-1709:
Hi Peter Sturge,
what are the limitations of this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929768#action_12929768
]
Mauricio Scheffer commented on LUCENENET-380:
-
@Aaron Powell: the ASF has of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tom Burton-West updated SOLR-2211:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2211.patch
Patch implements Solr UAX29TokenizerFactory and TestUAX29TokenizerFa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929775#action_12929775
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2211:
---
Thanks Tom, looks great. I'll commit soon.
> Create
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir reassigned SOLR-2211:
-
Assignee: Robert Muir
> Create Solr FilterFactory for Lucene StandardTokenizer with UAX#29 suppor
What about if we define an id field (like in solr)?
Last time I floated the idea of supporting primary keys as a core concept in
Lucene (in the context of helping doc updates, not linking) there were
objections along the lines of "lucene shouldn't try to be a database"
On 8 Nov 2010, at 20:4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929786#action_12929786
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1709:
Hi Peter,
Thanks for your message. There's of cour
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved SOLR-2211.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.1
Committed revision 1032776, 1032779
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/1148/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.TestDistributedSearch.testDistribSearch
Error Message:
Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Some threads threw uncaugh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929800#action_12929800
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2040:
ConcurrentLRUCache is not strictly bounded by the s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley closed SOLR-2040.
--
Resolution: Not A Problem
Closing - this is working as designed as far as I see.
> is ConcurrentLRUCach
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929810#action_12929810
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
The problem could be that IW deleteDo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929813#action_12929813
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-379:
---
Any objections then to just diggi
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-3.x/175/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 21371 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929823#action_12929823
]
Tom Burton-West commented on SOLR-2211:
---
Thanks for all your help Robert. We will be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929826#action_12929826
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2747:
---
Ay, ay "Code Dup Policeman".
>From perf st
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/1149/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.CloudStateUpdateTest.testCoreRegistration
Error Message:
expected:<2> but was:<3>
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<2> but was:<3>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929834#action_12929834
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2747:
-
Wait, thats an interesting point, any advantage
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929849#action_12929849
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2211:
---
Great, I look forward to the results.
By the way, on
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/1152/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriter.testCommitThreadSafety
Error Message:
null
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
at
org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$Luc
add Kamikaze 3.0.1 into Lucene
--
Key: LUCENE-2750
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2750
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Sub-task
Components: contrib/*
Reporter: hao yan
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/1357/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 18287 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/1155/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.TestDistributedSearch.testDistribSearch
Error Message:
Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Some threads threw uncaugh
TermVectorComponent did not return results when using distributedProcess in
distribution envs
-
Key: SOLR-2224
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2224
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929916#action_12929916
]
tom liu commented on SOLR-2224:
---
we can delete distributedProcess method, and add modifyReques
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929927#action_12929927
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2680:
--
Ok, TestThreadedOptimize works when t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929934#action_12929934
]
DM Smith commented on LUCENE-2747:
--
I'm not too keen on this. For classics and ancient te
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929936#action_12929936
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2747:
-
Robert, your patch looks good - I have a couple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929945#action_12929945
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2747:
-
bq. I'm not too keen on this. For classics and
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/1158/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest.testDistribSearch
Error Message:
.response.numFound:35!=67
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: .response.numFound:35!=67
81 matches
Mail list logo
