The definition of CharArraySet is dangerously confusing and leads to bugs when
used.
Key: LUCENENET-414
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-414
Proj
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/8006/
2 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler.testStopPoll
Error Message:
expected:<498> but was:<497>
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<498> but was:<497>
Build failed in the flexscoring branch because of Javadoc warnings
--
Key: LUCENE-3093
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3093
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032841#comment-13032841
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-3092:
-
*highfive Uwe* was going to suggest th
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/8003/
15 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.CloudStateUpdateTest.testCoreRegistration
Error Message:
Could not connect to ZooKeeper 127.0.0.1:61986 within 3 ms
Stack Trace:
java.util.concurrent.TimeoutExce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032828#comment-13032828
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3092:
---
Could we not simply use IOContext? When IO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032821#comment-13032821
]
Chris Male edited comment on LUCENE-3092 at 5/13/11 4:33 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male updated LUCENE-3092:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3092-listener.patch
Patch which roughly does what I suggested. Just a proof-of-c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032813#comment-13032813
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-3092:
Having not looked into the patch, what about som
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi updated SOLR-2512:
-
Attachment: SOLR-2512.patch
README.txt updated.
> uima: add an ability to skip runtime error in A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032732#comment-13032732
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3092:
Yeah you should ask this dir for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032721#comment-13032721
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3092:
---
Sorry false alarm, haven't seen the JavaDo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi updated SOLR-2512:
-
Attachment: SOLR-2512.patch
Updated patch attached. I understand the requirement for logging uniqu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032718#comment-13032718
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3092:
---
I don't completely understand how this wor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3092:
---
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.2
> N
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3092:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3092.patch
Patch.
The patch add NRTCachingDir in core, but if/wh
NRTCachingDirectory, to buffer small segments in a RAMDir
-
Key: LUCENE-3092
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3092
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3082:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3082-reorder-warnings.patch
Patch that adds some warnings about reordering
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-2984.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
committed i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-3058.
Resolution: Fixed
> FST should allow more than one output for the same input
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-3087.
Resolution: Fixed
> highlighting exact phrase with overlapping tokens fails.
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032514#comment-13032514
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3087:
OK I opened LUCENE-3091.
> high
Highlighter's TokenSources should use TermVector positions if indexed
-
Key: LUCENE-3091
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3091
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue
I found the issue - created LUCENE-3090 for it...
I am on it.
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> I dug some into this heap dump...
>
> Somehow we have a DWPT using WAY too much RAM (301 MB). A 2nd DWPT
> has 105 MB tied up. I'm getting these numbers from the bytesUsed
DWFlushControl does not take active DWPT out of the loop on fullFlush
-
Key: LUCENE-3090
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3090
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032503#comment-13032503
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2984:
-
bq. Patch looks good Simon! Maybe add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032500#comment-13032500
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2984:
Patch looks good Simon! Maybe a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032499#comment-13032499
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-3034:
-
bq. My original workaround was to simply pad t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1076:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1076.patch
Patch against 3.x, changing default if matchVersion is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032488#comment-13032488
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3087:
bq. We could try to improve that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032483#comment-13032483
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on SOLR-2512:
---
One more thing I'd change is using StringBui
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032476#comment-13032476
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3087:
-
bq. So... maybe we should fix the code so that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032472#comment-13032472
]
Pierre Gossé edited comment on LUCENE-3087 at 5/12/11 3:59 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032472#comment-13032472
]
Pierre Gossé commented on LUCENE-3087:
--
Yes, that would be the best.
But I'm not su
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032468#comment-13032468
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3087:
Ahh, interesting.
So... maybe w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032459#comment-13032459
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-3034:
-
Hey Doron - I have a patch for this, I've just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032453#comment-13032453
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-3034:
-
Hi Mark, could you add an example algorithm wi
+1
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Alon Shwartz wrote:
> [+1]. It's way over due and time to move on to new technologies. I would
> move to .Net 4.0 as by the time the Lucene.Net would be ready and
> (somewhat) stable so will .Net 4.0
>
>
> Alon Shwartz
> CTO & co-founder
> docstoc.com
> al...
[+1]. It's way over due and time to move on to new technologies. I would
move to .Net 4.0 as by the time the Lucene.Net would be ready and
(somewhat) stable so will .Net 4.0
Alon Shwartz
CTO & co-founder
docstoc.com
al...@docstoc.com
o: (310) 255-1172
m: (818) 231-8191
f: (310) 255-1176
a: 4
[+1]
Regards
Anders Lybecker
http://www.lybecker.com/blog/
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Troy Howard wrote:
> All,
>
> Please cast your votes regarding the topic of .Net Framework support.
>
> The question on the table is:
>
> Should Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4 be the last release which supports
+1.
I think we should run a v2 branch from main for a while rather than polluting
the code base. The v2 branch dies a natural death when parches are stopped
being applied.
For the record I made v4 decision last night for my application.
Ken Foskey
On 10/05/2011, at 8:26 AM, Troy Howard wrot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032447#comment-13032447
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on SOLR-2512:
--
If no one objects, I'll commit tomorrow.
> ui
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3040:
Attachment: LUCENE-3040.patch
patch synced up to trunk. I think its safe to commit now that LUCENE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032421#comment-13032421
]
Pierre Gossé edited comment on LUCENE-3087 at 5/12/11 2:17 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032421#comment-13032421
]
Pierre Gossé commented on LUCENE-3087:
--
Thanks for taking a look at this Michael.
I
CachingTokenFilter can cause close() to be called twice.
Key: LUCENE-3089
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3089
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Repo
inconsistency of tokenstream.end() with OffsetLimitTokenFilter and
LimitTokenCountFilter
Key: LUCENE-3088
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3088
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3064:
Fix Version/s: 3.2
> add checks to MockTokenizer to enforce proper consumption
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032408#comment-13032408
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3064:
-
Committed revision 1102290.
I know the checks
I dug some into this heap dump...
Somehow we have a DWPT using WAY too much RAM (301 MB). A 2nd DWPT
has 105 MB tied up. I'm getting these numbers from the bytesUsed
AtomicLong in the DWPT class from the dump.
This is baffling because, although this test indexes a large amount of
content for a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3084:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3084-trunk-only.patch
Here a patch that removes List interface.
It needs t
Welcome!
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 4:09 AM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Lucene PMC Welcomes 3 N
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032380#comment-13032380
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1421:
{quote}
bq. But what if docid=2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi updated SOLR-2512:
-
Attachment: SOLR-2512.patch
A new patch. I added a test case for the flag true|false.
About the l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032359#comment-13032359
]
Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENE-2215:
Thanks. I ended up using the sta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032357#comment-13032357
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on SOLR-2512:
---
bq. I think that users who set ignoreErrors=
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032350#comment-13032350
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on LUCENE-1421:
---
bq. But what if docid=2 ha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3087:
---
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.2
> highlighting exact phrase with overlappi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032349#comment-13032349
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3087:
Thank you for the patch with tes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-3087:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> highlighting exact phrase with overlapping toke
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2984:
Attachment: LUCENE-2984.patch
next iteration.
Since we are iterating FieldInfos to find ou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032344#comment-13032344
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1076:
bq. I think this is a very hard
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Welcome aboard!!
>
+1
> Mike
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> The Lucene PMC would like to announce the addition of Steve Rowe, Shai Erera
>> and Doron Cohen to the PMC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032342#comment-13032342
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1421:
But what if docid=2 had age=17 i
Welcome aboard!!
Mike
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> The Lucene PMC would like to announce the addition of Steve Rowe, Shai Erera
> and Doron Cohen to the PMC. All of them have been long time committers to
> Lucene and Solr and we lo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032339#comment-13032339
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on SOLR-2512:
--
Hi Tommaso, thank you for updating the patch!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032320#comment-13032320
]
Thomas Gambier commented on SOLR-2509:
--
More investigation :
I've located that spellc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tommaso Teofili updated SOLR-2501:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2501.patch
first draft patch which handles relative/absolute file paths to retr
additional remarks: I used solr with version 3.1
-邮件原件-
发件人: simon.willna...@googlemail.com [mailto:simon.willna...@googlemail.com] 代表
Simon Willnauer
发送时间: 2011年5月12日 16:07
收件人: shuigen kang
抄送: dev@lucene.apache.org; 卜沉
主题: Re: a optimizable point about solr
Hey good catch :)
we alrea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tommaso Teofili updated SOLR-2512:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2512.patch
first patch which adds a configuration parameter to
decide if erro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032265#comment-13032265
]
Tommaso Teofili edited comment on SOLR-2512 at 5/12/11 8:10 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032265#comment-13032265
]
Tommaso Teofili edited comment on SOLR-2512 at 5/12/11 8:07 AM:
-
Hi all:
*I was recently used solr to set up a Search Engine for our web site.
In the process of performance test, I used jprofiler to analyse the
operational aspect of solr , And found a optimizable point, in the method
getLuceneVersion(String path, Version def) of class
org.apache.solr.cor
Hey good catch :)
we already addressed this issue AFAIK here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2493
so the question is if we need to do another release since it seems serious.
simon
2011/5/12 shuigen kang :
> Hi all:
>
> I was recently used solr to set up a Search Engine for our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032291#comment-13032291
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3084:
-
bq. NavigableSet ist Java 6. SortedSet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032282#comment-13032282
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1076 at 5/12/11 7:21 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reopened LUCENE-3082:
---
We should add a warning to the MergePolicy/IndexUpgrader, that this tool
reorders segments, if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032282#comment-13032282
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1076:
---
{quote}
bq. This means docIDs may be reor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032279#comment-13032279
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3084:
---
Just to note:
Cutover to Set was not int
79 matches
Mail list logo
