[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vinicius Barros updated LUCENE-1768:
Attachment: week-8.patch
This patch includes javadocs for the changes I did so far.
I am
Hi,
„ant javadocs“ (without “-core”) inside QP module should work.
Because you asked: You can regenerate the JavaCC source files by “ant javacc”
(which rebuilds all parser source files), or “ant javacc-flexible” (for the
flexible QP).
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63
Hi,
I am not longer able to run ant javadoc after queryparser was moved from
contrib to modules. Is there any new target name to execute generate javadocs?
Regards,
Vinicius Barros
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066786#comment-13066786
]
Christian Moen commented on LUCENE-3305:
Thanks, Simon. Please let me know where
omitPositions improvements
--
Key: SOLR-2660
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2660
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 3.3, 4.0
Reporter: Robert Muir
Prio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated SOLR-2660:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2660.patch
> omitPositions improvements
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066746#comment-13066746
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on SOLR-2637:
-
I created SOLR-1681 way back to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn van Groningen updated LUCENE-3097:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3097.patch
Attached updated patch.
* Updated to current tru
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Varun Thacker updated LUCENE-2795:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2795.patch
Changed DirectIOLinuxDirectory to NativeUnixDirectory and also m
I agree, and we do!
I just committed an explicit test case to make sure (instead of
relying on random(2000) returning 0).
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> We should in all cases allow 0-length bitsets. Think of a Filter that
We should in all cases allow 0-length bitsets. Think of a Filter that gets
invoked with a 0-document segment (empty index). Maybe thats not possible,
but without allowing 0-length, it would crash.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi
OK so this was a test-only limitation (good) not a problem w/ FixedBitSet.
I'll add an additional test case to explicitly test the 0 case.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
> You mean whether FixedBitSet should throw exc if numBit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066697#comment-13066697
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2309:
---
To come back to decoupling:
With the new A
You mean whether FixedBitSet should throw exc if numBits=0? I don't
think it's very likely that someone will use it?
But you're right - it's not invalid to create a 0-length bitset, even
if not very useful.
Shai
On Sunday, July 17, 2011, Michael McCandless wrote:
> Is it just the test that has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066689#comment-13066689
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2309:
-
{quote}
I just don't see how this would work.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066688#comment-13066688
]
Chris Male edited comment on LUCENE-2309 at 7/17/11 4:35 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066688#comment-13066688
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2309:
{code}
I think if we want this to take Attribute
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066684#comment-13066684
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2309:
-
{quote}
I'm happy to explore those other consu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066683#comment-13066683
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2309:
{quote}
But i don't think queryparser should tak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066682#comment-13066682
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2309:
I just want to re-iterate the point that I'm jus
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066681#comment-13066681
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-2659:
---
bq. maybe simpler/more consistent if its solr home i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066680#comment-13066680
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2659:
---
maybe simpler/more consistent if its solr home is ju
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated SOLR-2659:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2659.patch
Patch implementing the proposal.
Before applying the patch, run this svn mo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066677#comment-13066677
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2309:
-
well if thats the direction here, then we shou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066676#comment-13066676
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2309:
---
I think Chris only started with the indexe
IntelliJ resource copying of solrj/src/test-files/** and core/src/test-files/**
to build output directory has to choose between/overwrite same-named files
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066675#comment-13066675
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2309:
-
And that might be a good way, my point is if t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066673#comment-13066673
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2309:
---
I like the idea here, that is "hey analyze
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066672#comment-13066672
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2309:
-
{quote}
What I'm exploring with this direction
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1309#comment-1309
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2309:
You make good points and I don't have answers fo
dataimport.properties : change datetime format
---
Key: SOLR-2658
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2658
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: contrib - DataImp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1307#comment-1307
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2309:
-
I'm just asking the question because, maybe i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1305#comment-1305
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2309:
Good point. I guess it will continue to have a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1302#comment-1302
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2309:
-
{quote}
Fortunately, the patch I put up means
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066658#comment-13066658
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2309:
Fortunately, the patch I put up means PerFieldAn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066657#comment-13066657
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2309:
-
Yes, so my idea is basically that Analyzer get
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066656#comment-13066656
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2309:
While I digest your suggestion on handling the g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066650#comment-13066650
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2309:
-
bq. haven't addressed the OffSetGap issue
I a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male updated LUCENE-2309:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2309.patch
Note, this patch is against the FieldType branch and is very, very, VE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Elschot resolved LUCENE-2250.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
This is more easily done by transposing the positions, see LUCENE-3325 .
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066631#comment-13066631
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-3325:
--
Perhaps this also speeds up segment merging,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066630#comment-13066630
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-3325:
--
Currently positions are stored in this order
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066628#comment-13066628
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-3325:
--
This was more or less suggested in:
"Compre
Transpose positions in index
Key: LUCENE-3325
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3325
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Wish
Components: core/index
Reporter: Paul Elschot
Is it just the test that has a problem w/ numBits == 0?
I think it should be fine to create a 0-length bitset. It's just that
you can't then use it :)
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 2:01 AM, wrote:
> Author: shaie
> Date: Sun Jul 17 06:01:02 2011
> New
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe resolved SOLR-2452.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Resolving this issue as trunk and branch_3x seem to have stabilized; when
problems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066619#comment-13066619
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2795:
OK, so now we create a FileDescr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-3324.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.4
> checkindex fails if docfreq
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13066612#comment-13066612
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3324:
-
the bug is obvious: I'm gonna commit soon and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3324:
Affects Version/s: 3.2
adding 3.2, this was also broken in that release.
> checkindex fails if do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3324:
Attachment: LUCENE-3324.patch
> checkindex fails if docfreq >= skipInterval and term is indexed mo
checkindex fails if docfreq >= skipInterval and term is indexed more than once
at same position
---
Key: LUCENE-3324
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3324
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Varun Thacker updated LUCENE-2795:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2795.patch
I'm not sure this is the correct/best way to this.
> Genericiz
53 matches
Mail list logo
