Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 3.3 (rc3) (nag)

2011-07-24 Thread Andi Vajda
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011, Andi Vajda wrote: Today is day 3 of this vote. At this time, we have 2 PMC votes and 3 community votes. One more PMC vote is needed for releasing PyLucene 3.3-3. This vote has passed. Thank you to all who voted ! Andi.. Please consider voting for these release

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3318) Sketch out highlighting based on term positions / position iterators

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070126#comment-13070126 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3318: --- Some note from the TokenmStream policeman:

[jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (LUCENE-3318) Sketch out highlighting based on term positions / position iterators

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070126#comment-13070126 ] Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-3318 at 7/24/11 9:17 AM:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3328) Specialize BooleanQuery if all clauses are TermQueries

2011-07-24 Thread Paul Elschot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070134#comment-13070134 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-3328: -- bq. this works and looks as expected.

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3328) Specialize BooleanQuery if all clauses are TermQueries

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070135#comment-13070135 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3328: --- Indeed breaks in Java are no real gotos.

Re: Possible bug in buffered deletes on trunk?

2011-07-24 Thread Mike McCandless
Not good! I'll dig once I'm back from vacation... sounds like something is up. Mike Sent from my iPad On Jul 23, 2011, at 4:24 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote: So eventually of course, after spending a few years in GC hell, you do hit the OOM. On Jul 23, 2011, at 10:33 AM,

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3318) Sketch out highlighting based on term positions / position iterators

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070139#comment-13070139 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3318: --- Hi, {code:java} if (q instanceof

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3334) IOUtils.closeSafely should log suppressed Exceptions in stack trace of original Exception (a new feature of Java 7)

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070142#comment-13070142 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3334: --- bq. would help runtime bytecode optimizers

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3334) IOUtils.closeSafely should log suppressed Exceptions in stack trace of original Exception (a new feature of Java 7)

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3334: -- Attachment: LUCENE-3334.patch Here my final patch. IOUtils.closeSafely should log

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-2795) Genericize DirectIOLinuxDir - UnixDir

2011-07-24 Thread Varun Thacker (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Varun Thacker updated LUCENE-2795: -- Attachment: LUCENE-2795.patch Sorry for the delay. I have made the changes suggested.

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3318) Sketch out highlighting based on term positions / position iterators

2011-07-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070149#comment-13070149 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3318: - {quote} About the payloads encoding: I would

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-2672) EchoParamsTest fails with Java 7 (randomly)

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
EchoParamsTest fails with Java 7 (randomly) --- Key: SOLR-2672 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2672 Project: Solr Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Uwe Schindler This test fails

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-2673) (Possibly) Caching(???) issues with TestFiltering and RequiredFieldsTest (and few more)

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
(Possibly) Caching(???) issues with TestFiltering and RequiredFieldsTest (and few more) Key: SOLR-2673 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3335) jrebug causes porter stemmer to sigsegv

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070153#comment-13070153 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3335: --- I opened SOLR-2672 and SOLR-2673 for the

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2672) EchoParamsTest fails with Java 7 (randomly)

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070152#comment-13070152 ] Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2672: - It is definitely not a Hotspot issue, as it also

New JIRA Tag for Java7-related bugs

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, I created a new JIRA tag for Java7-related bugs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truejqlQuer y=labels+%3D+Java7 Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) (Possibly) Caching(???) issues with TestFiltering and RequiredFieldsTest (and few more)

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070156#comment-13070156 ] Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2673: - I tried making all methods of ConcurrentLRUCache

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3097) Post grouping faceting

2011-07-24 Thread Martijn van Groningen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Martijn van Groningen updated LUCENE-3097: -- Attachment: LUCENE-3097.patch Updated the patch. * Fixed the test failure

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3097) Post grouping faceting

2011-07-24 Thread Martijn van Groningen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Martijn van Groningen updated LUCENE-3097: -- Attachment: LUCENE-3097.patch Updated patch again. I forgot to update some

RE: New JIRA Tag for Java7-related bugs

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler
Sorry, here a better link for that don't wrap: http://s.apache.org/Java7Failures - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 2:19

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) (Possibly) Caching(???) issues with TestFiltering and RequiredFieldsTest (and few more)

2011-07-24 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070162#comment-13070162 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2673: Hmmm... notice the numFound:5 There are only 4

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) (Possibly) Caching(???) issues with TestFiltering and RequiredFieldsTest (and few more)

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070164#comment-13070164 ] Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2673: - Aa. We should always clear the index.

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) (Possibly) Caching(???) issues with TestFiltering and RequiredFieldsTest (and few more)

2011-07-24 Thread Dawid Weiss (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070166#comment-13070166 ] Dawid Weiss commented on SOLR-2673: --- Can you confirm this? If this is the case, it'll be

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-2673: Summary: Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070169#comment-13070169 ] Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2673: - More info, so its really not defined in which

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-2672) EchoParamsTest fails with Java 7 (randomly)

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-2672: Attachment: SOLR-2672.patch Simple fix. EchoParamsTest fails with Java 7 (randomly)

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-2673: Attachment: SOLR-2673.patch Simple fix for TestFiltering. Some Solr tests depend on order of test

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070171#comment-13070171 ] Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2673: --- {noformat} Index:

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Chris Male (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070173#comment-13070173 ] Chris Male commented on SOLR-2673: -- Was just going to suggest the same thing Robert!

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070174#comment-13070174 ] Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2673: --- hehe i want all tests to be reproducible though,

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Chris Male (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070177#comment-13070177 ] Chris Male commented on SOLR-2673: -- If the Collection is ordered differently each time

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070178#comment-13070178 ] Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2673: --- The problem i am concerned about would be e.g. a

[JENKINS] Solr-3.x - Build # 417 - Failure

2011-07-24 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Solr-3.x/417/ All tests passed Build Log (for compile errors): [...truncated 29860 lines...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 9725 - Failure

2011-07-24 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/9725/ No tests ran. Build Log (for compile errors): [...truncated 43 lines...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070179#comment-13070179 ] Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2673: --- By the way, if you add this shuffle, all these

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Chris Male (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070180#comment-13070180 ] Chris Male commented on SOLR-2673: -- Absolutely. My point is, can we even avoid that since

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070181#comment-13070181 ] Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2673: --- I doubt its truly random... it may be undefined but

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Chris Male (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070183#comment-13070183 ] Chris Male commented on SOLR-2673: -- We could also sort it to a known order

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2672) EchoParamsTest fails with Java 7 (randomly)

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070182#comment-13070182 ] Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2672: - Committed trunk revision: 1150362 Committed 3.x

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-2523) SolrJ QueryResponse doesn't support range facets

2011-07-24 Thread Martijn van Groningen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Martijn van Groningen resolved SOLR-2523. - Resolution: Fixed Committed. 3x branch in revision 1150364 trunk in revision

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070185#comment-13070185 ] Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2673: - First bunch fixed (TestFiltering and

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-2673: Fix Version/s: 4.0 3.4 Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-2672) EchoParamsTest fails with Java 7 (randomly)

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-2672: Fix Version/s: 4.0 3.4 EchoParamsTest fails with Java 7 (randomly)

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070186#comment-13070186 ] Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2673: - bq. We could also sort it to a known order

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070188#comment-13070188 ] Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2673: - bq. I doubt its truly random... it may be

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Chris Male (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070187#comment-13070187 ] Chris Male commented on SOLR-2673: -- Yup. Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated SOLR-2673: -- Attachment: SOLR-2673_randomize_methods.patch attached is a patch that inits LTC's random inside

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070192#comment-13070192 ] Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2673: --- {quote} We must do this in all cases, because else

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated SOLR-2673: -- Attachment: SOLR-2673_randomize_methods.patch updated patch, with the sort-by-name before shuffle.

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Chris Male (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070194#comment-13070194 ] Chris Male commented on SOLR-2673: -- +1 Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods

[JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-3.x #197: POMs out of sync

2011-07-24 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-3.x/197/ No tests ran. Build Log (for compile errors): [...truncated 138 lines...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands,

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 9726 - Still Failing

2011-07-24 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/9726/ No tests ran. Build Log (for compile errors): [...truncated 28 lines...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional

[JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk #198: POMs out of sync

2011-07-24 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/198/ No tests ran. Build Log (for compile errors): [...truncated 138 lines...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands,

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x - Build # 9736 - Failure

2011-07-24 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/9736/ No tests ran. Build Log (for compile errors): [...truncated 28 lines...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional

RE: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk #198: POMs out of sync

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler
Sorry, I heavy stopped tests to get my tests running. :-) - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: Apache Jenkins Server [mailto:jenk...@builds.apache.org] Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 4:16 PM To:

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x-java7 - Build # 2 - Still Failing

2011-07-24 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x-java7/2/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: TEST-org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestPorterStemFilter.xml.init Error Message: Stack Trace: Test report file

RE: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x-java7 - Build # 2 - Still Failing

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler
Porter again, in 3.x class name is different. Fixed in rev 1150386. - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: Apache Jenkins Server [mailto:jenk...@builds.apache.org] Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 9727 - Still Failing

2011-07-24 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/9727/ 2 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.core.RAMDirectoryFactoryTest.testOpenReturnsTheSameForSamePath Error Message: RAMDirectoryFactory should not create new instance of RefCntRamDirectory every time open() is

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x - Build # 9737 - Failure

2011-07-24 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/9737/ No tests ran. Build Log (for compile errors): [...truncated 97 lines...] [javac]

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x-java7 - Build # 3 - Still Failing

2011-07-24 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x-java7/3/ No tests ran. Build Log (for compile errors): [...truncated 89 lines...] [javac]

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 - Build # 8 - Still Failing

2011-07-24 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/8/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.MultiCoreEmbeddedTest.testMultiCore Error Message: Index directory exists after core unload with deleteIndex=true Stack Trace:

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 9728 - Still Failing

2011-07-24 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/9728/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.core.RAMDirectoryFactoryTest.testOpenReturnsTheSameForSamePath Error Message: RAMDirectoryFactory should not create new instance of RefCntRamDirectory every time open() is called

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-3334) IOUtils.closeSafely should log suppressed Exceptions in stack trace of original Exception (a new feature of Java 7)

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-3334. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.0 3.4 Committed trunk

[update] adding field with constructor demanding tokenStream fails - Field(name, tokenStream, termVector) BUG

2011-07-24 Thread andrzej_gadek
Hi, I have to deal with serious bug problem. My program doesn't work correctly. Problem shows it self probably in this part of code: [code] StandardAnalyzer stAnalyzer = new StandardAnalyzer(Version.LUCENE_31); TokenStream stStream = stAnalyzer.tokenStream(analizedContent, new

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3318) Sketch out highlighting based on term positions / position iterators

2011-07-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070208#comment-13070208 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3318: - {quote} Also - I did run a quick test to

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x-java7 - Build # 5 - Still Failing

2011-07-24 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x-java7/5/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.SolrExampleJettyTest.testChineseDefaults Error Message: null Stack Trace: java.lang.NullPointerException at

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3318) Sketch out highlighting based on term positions / position iterators

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070210#comment-13070210 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3318: --- bq. Also - I did run a quick test to

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3318) Sketch out highlighting based on term positions / position iterators

2011-07-24 Thread Mike Sokolov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070211#comment-13070211 ] Mike Sokolov commented on LUCENE-3318: -- bq. Maybe the rewritemethod used here for

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 - Build # 9 - Still Failing

2011-07-24 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/9/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.SolrExampleStreamingTest.testStreamingRequest Error Message: null Stack Trace: java.lang.NullPointerException at

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 - Build # 10 - Still Failing

2011-07-24 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/10/ All tests passed Build Log (for compile errors): [...truncated 16954 lines...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x-java7 - Build # 6 - Still Failing

2011-07-24 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x-java7/6/ All tests passed Build Log (for compile errors): [...truncated 19845 lines...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070221#comment-13070221 ] Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2673: --- I think we can resolve this issue now. Some Solr

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3318) Sketch out highlighting based on term positions / position iterators

2011-07-24 Thread Mike Sokolov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070223#comment-13070223 ] Mike Sokolov commented on LUCENE-3318: -- bq. The TokenStream must call

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070222#comment-13070222 ] Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2673: - We should add a changes entry. Some Solr tests

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3318) Sketch out highlighting based on term positions / position iterators

2011-07-24 Thread Mike Sokolov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mike Sokolov updated LUCENE-3318: - Attachment: LUCENE-3318.patch updated patch encodes offset payloads as VInts, corrects

[update] adding field with constructor demanding tokenStream fails - Field(name, tokenStream, termVector) BUG

2011-07-24 Thread andrzej_gadek
update - I have find out that the problem comes from those constructors: new Field(name, tokenStream) new Field(name, tokenStream, termVector) how? [code] StandardAnalyzer stAnalyzer = new StandardAnalyzer(Version.LUCENE_30); TokenStream stStream = stAnalyzer.tokenStream(analizedContent, new

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3097) Post grouping faceting

2011-07-24 Thread Martijn van Groningen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070231#comment-13070231 ] Martijn van Groningen commented on LUCENE-3097: --- Committed to trunk (rev.

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070232#comment-13070232 ] Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2673: --- i don't think thats very important, its just our

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir resolved SOLR-2673. --- Resolution: Fixed Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems

RE: [update] adding field with constructor demanding tokenStream fails - Field(name, tokenStream, termVector) BUG

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler
The problem with your code is simple: You cannot consume a tokenstream twice (like an iterator), when you consume it with the System.out.println() loop it can no longer be consumed by the Indexer. The same happens when you add the same TokenStream to several Fields to index. Still I don’t

Re: [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Chris Hostetter
: i don't think thats very important, its just our internal tests, and everyone here is a committer. Wasn't the new randomization added to the test-framework ? we advertise that as a package users can use to write their own tests using lucene -- if we had tests that depended on order other

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-2078) Search Grouping: SolrJ support

2011-07-24 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man resolved SOLR-2078. Resolution: Duplicate Search Grouping: SolrJ support --

Re: [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Robert Muir
The order is undefined in java itself: its randomish in sun's java 7 for instance (and maybe other implementations, too). We just made it random always, so it will fail consistently regardless of JRE implementation. Adding CHANGES.txt to test changes seems like a slippery slope, the behavior and

Re: [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Chris Hostetter
: We just made it random always, so it will fail consistently regardless : of JRE implementation. Right, which means people who: * have an app that uses Lucene * have tests that use the Lucene test-framework * upgrade lucene w/o changing their app or their JVM ...could now get failures. :

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 9735 - Failure

2011-07-24 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/9735/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.search.grouping.TermAllGroupHeadsCollectorTest.testRandom Error Message: 4 Stack Trace: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 4 at

Re: [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Robert Muir
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote: I agree that the back-compat on classes in test-framework should be loose, and we should be allowed to break compat anytime it helps improve our test coverage, but we should at least *mention* in CHANGES when we

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-2674) Schema field validation does not look for inconsistencies between field and fieldType

2011-07-24 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
Schema field validation does not look for inconsistencies between field and fieldType - Key: SOLR-2674 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2674 Project:

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2669) SchemaField.calcProps has some backwards validation

2011-07-24 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070241#comment-13070241 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2669: Thanks for the review rmuir Committed revision 1150478. -

Re: [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2673) Some Solr tests depend on order of test methods in source file, but Java 7 seems to no longer ensure that

2011-07-24 Thread Dawid Weiss
There's no harm in mentioning it, Robert. This is something people may not be aware of, so consider it a golden nugget of information about Java7 behavior hidden in CHANGES. :) Dawid On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Chris

[solved] adding field with constructor demanding tokenStream fails - Field(name, tokenStream, termVector) BUG

2011-07-24 Thread andrzej_gadek
looks like solution!! :) Many thanks for your response. I thought about that but, shouldn't the reset method make that tokenStream reusable? Haven't found such information in documentation or any code example with that constructor. My bypass method works too, but demand much more resources...

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-3336) Remove a dependency of javadoc tasks on compile

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
Remove a dependency of javadoc tasks on compile --- Key: LUCENE-3336 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3336 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Uwe

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3336) Remove a dependency of javadoc tasks on compile

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3336: -- Attachment: LUCENE-3336.patch A quick fix for Lucene's javadocs-all task. Solr is more

Re: [unsolved] adding field with constructor demanding tokenStream fails - Field(name, tokenStream, termVector) BUG

2011-07-24 Thread andrzej_gadek
Sorry, too soon to celebrate. I've entered those fixes but that code below dose not working! field value in index is null :( in my opinion it is not a case of multi time used tokenStream. PolishAnalyzer plAnalyzer = new PolishAnalyzer (Version.LUCENE_33); TokenStream plStream =

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3336) Remove a dependency of javadoc tasks on compile

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3336: -- Attachment: LUCENE-3336.patch Now also Solr javadocs build 2 times faster Remove a

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-3336) Remove a dependency of javadoc tasks on compile

2011-07-24 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-3336. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.0 3.4 Lucene Fields: [New,

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-3337) avoid building jar files unless necessary in build

2011-07-24 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
avoid building jar files unless necessary in build -- Key: LUCENE-3337 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3337 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Components:

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x - Build # 9745 - Failure

2011-07-24 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/9745/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.MultiCoreExampleJettyTest.testMultiCore Error Message: Can not find: /example/core1/update Can not find: /example/core1/update request:

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-3338) Flexible query parser does not support open ranges and range queries with mixed inclusive and exclusive ranges

2011-07-24 Thread Vinicius Barros (JIRA)
Flexible query parser does not support open ranges and range queries with mixed inclusive and exclusive ranges -- Key: LUCENE-3338 URL:

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 - Build # 12 - Failure

2011-07-24 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/12/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.lucene.search.grouping.TermAllGroupHeadsCollectorTest.testBasic Error Message: 1 Stack Trace: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 1 at

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2155) Geospatial search using geohash prefixes

2011-07-24 Thread William Bell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13070263#comment-13070263 ] William Bell commented on SOLR-2155: OK... Would it ask too much to commit this? It is

  1   2   >