> I think calling it a "system" might be overselling it! I just use this
> cron job: http://people.apache.org/~rmuir/test_runner.sh.txt
I've heard rumors that the entire world runs on bash, so nothing to be
ashamed of here, Robert :) It is awesome that you actually run with
different vms!
Dawid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070939#comment-13070939
]
Simon Rosenthal commented on SOLR-1032:
---
Patch is for 4.0
> CSV loader to support li
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070935#comment-13070935
]
Chris Male commented on SOLR-2242:
--
Having walked through the SimpleFacet codebase, I see
I only saw the end results ;) It does what it does regardless of how simply it
operates.
On Jul 25, 2011, at 7:31 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> I think calling it a "system" might be overselling it! I just use this
> cron job: http://people.apache.org/~rmuir/test_runner.sh.txt
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 20
I think calling it a "system" might be overselling it! I just use this
cron job: http://people.apache.org/~rmuir/test_runner.sh.txt
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Dawid Weiss
wrote:
> A bunch of random jvms from different vendors or just different
> versions of hotspot? Robert?
>
> Dawid
>
> On
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/25/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.core.TestJmxIntegration.testJmxOnCoreReload
Error Message:
Number of registered MBeans is not the same as info registry size expected:<51>
but was:<48>
Stack Trace:
junit.fra
Different vendors if I remember right - various sun jvms, the realtime jvm,
jrocket, whatever was available.
On Jul 25, 2011, at 5:19 PM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
> A bunch of random jvms from different vendors or just different
> versions of hotspot? Robert?
>
> Dawid
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x-java7/21/
5 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.collation.TestICUCollationKeyAnalyzer.testFarsiRangeFilterCollating
Error Message:
null
Stack Trace:
java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
at com.ibm.icu.text.Collato
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070802#comment-13070802
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-777:
Here is an updated patch for 3X - new test and ty
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-777:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-777-3X.patch
Whoops! Peter gave me another test that failed and I found that throu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Rosenthal updated SOLR-1032:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1032.patch
here's a first cut at a patch. The syntax for the literal field is
Hi,
With a new machine at apache, yes of course. Currently we have a Apache-FreeBSD
machine and this one only runs OpenJDK 6 or 7, nothing else :(
I was thinking about using spare time on our SD DataSolutions server donate to
a Jenkins installation (Ubuntu 10.04 LTS), it also has a currently un
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070767#comment-13070767
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-2668:
-
Thanks for the test Frank. There
A bunch of random jvms from different vendors or just different
versions of hotspot? Robert?
Dawid
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Robert has a system that runs the tests in a bunch of random JVM's already.
> Perhaps once we get our new hardware, we could it it on that?
>
I am preparing an unrelated presentation to which I needed something
that crunches lots of data and uses some cpu cycles. I decided to run
FST construction on that half-gig wikipedia file. Three jits: 1.6_u26,
1.7 pre-release and jrockit (newest available). The results are
interesting (although no
Robert has a system that runs the tests in a bunch of random JVM's already.
Perhaps once we get our new hardware, we could it it on that?
On Jul 25, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
> The recent wave of problems made me think of running Lucene on another
> flavor of java jit -- this could be
The recent wave of problems made me think of running Lucene on another
flavor of java jit -- this could be an interesting comparison in the
long run. Can we run a parallel set of test on jrockit, for instance?
Or even randomize the jit we're running on (I know Robert will support
me here since he's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070697#comment-13070697
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3340:
-
bq. I think it's ready to commit!
+1 t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070687#comment-13070687
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2308:
Looks great Nikola! All tests p
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/23/
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.lucene.facet.search.SamplingWrapperTest.testCountUsingSamping
Error Message:
CheckIndex failed
Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: CheckIndex failed
at org.apache.lucene.
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/9767/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.core.TestJmxIntegration.testJmxOnCoreReload
Error Message:
Number of registered MBeans is not the same as info registry size expected:<56>
but was:<55>
Stack Trace:
junit.framework
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-2671.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 1150840. - trunk
Committed revision 1150848. - 3x
...i didn't mention
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nikola Tankovic updated LUCENE-2308:
Attachment: LUCENE-2308-17.patch
P.17 (non-tested): fixed suggested issues
> Separately s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-2671:
---
Description: LUCENE-2048 introduced a SchemaField.indexOptions method which
returns an IndexOptions object bas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070661#comment-13070661
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-3335:
--
Thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hots
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070656#comment-13070656
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3220:
-
{quote}
Not sure which, because for me numberO
ok, this is somehow related to the porter stemming bug.
on java7, this makes a corrupt index (most of the time).
But, if i use the porter workaround described here
(http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/2011-July/005963.html),
then it prevents the corrupt index in this test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070654#comment-13070654
]
David Mark Nemeskey commented on LUCENE-3220:
-
I think I realized what I want
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070644#comment-13070644
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2795:
Getting closer!
Instead of {{#d
java6 is fine
java7: corrupt index.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/22/
>
> 1 tests failed.
> REGRESSION:
> org.apache.lucene.facet.search.SamplingWrapperTest.testCountUsingSamping
>
> Error
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070628#comment-13070628
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2308:
Patch looks good -- nice you jus
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/22/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.facet.search.SamplingWrapperTest.testCountUsingSamping
Error Message:
CheckIndex failed
Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: CheckIndex failed
at org.apache.luc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070615#comment-13070615
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3335:
-
fyi: I asked the gods of jit on hotspot-dev ma
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070603#comment-13070603
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3335:
-
The bug is now visible at
http://bugs.sun.com
Robert and me investigated the source code of ICU ULocale 4.8.
The problem is that the Java default locale seems unknown to ULocale (because
Java 7 seems to contain new Locales not included in ICU) and then it fails to
init the whole class (static initializer allocating locale of Java default).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3340:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3340.patch
Thanks Simon!
I found another case where the deletes
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x-java7/17/
4 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.collation.TestICUCollationKeyFilter.testCollationKeySort
Error Message:
null
Stack Trace:
java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
at com.ibm.icu.text.Collator.getInstan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070540#comment-13070540
]
Maxim Valyanskiy edited comment on SOLR-2090 at 7/25/11 2:50 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070540#comment-13070540
]
Maxim Valyanskiy commented on SOLR-2090:
This patch add support java.io.Reader requ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maxim Valyanskiy updated SOLR-2090:
---
Attachment: SOLR-2090.patch
patch
> Allow reader to be passed in SolrInputDocument.addField m
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hm,
>
> seems my fix improved the test, but not fixed this problem.
This is a new test I just wrote... I'll see if I can reproduce it by
cranking up the number of operations.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
-
Hm,
seems my fix improved the test, but not fixed this problem.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Apache Jenkins Server [mailto:jenk...@builds.apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 3:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3338:
--
Comment: was deleted
(was: fixed merge duplication)
> Flexible query parser does not support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3338:
--
Attachment: week9-merged-nosurround.patch
Hi Vinicius,
I attached the same patch, with change
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-3340:
Attachment: LUCENE-3340.patch
here is a patch. The FlushPolicy only consulted the current
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070488#comment-13070488
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3338:
---
Hi Vinicius, can you check, that the merge
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3338:
--
Attachment: (was: week9-merged.patch)
> Flexible query parser does not support open ranges
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3338:
--
Attachment: week9-merged.patch
fixed merge duplication
> Flexible query parser does not suppo
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/9750/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.search.TestRealTimeGet.testStressGetRealtime
Error Message:
null
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
at
org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$LuceneTestCa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070486#comment-13070486
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3097:
Thanks/
Woops -- also the comme
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-3339.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.4
> TestNRTThreads hangs in nightly 3.x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070483#comment-13070483
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1768:
---
Committed the javadocs changes in rev 1150
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3338:
--
Attachment: week9-merged.patch
Here the merged patch.
> Flexible query parser does not suppor
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/9759/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.core.TestJmxIntegration.testJmxOnCoreReload
Error Message:
Number of registered MBeans is not the same as info registry size expected:<56>
but was:<55>
Stack Trace:
junit.framework
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3339:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3339.patch
Patch attached.
I can't repro this locally, but I thi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-3339:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> TestNRTThreads hangs in nightly 3.x builds
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070476#comment-13070476
]
Juan Antonio Farré Basurte commented on SOLR-2632:
--
That is good to know.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070467#comment-13070467
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3338:
---
bq. I found something while creating junit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070464#comment-13070464
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on LUCENE-3097:
---
I've fixed that. It now re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070459#comment-13070459
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2632:
---
This will vary depending on what highlighter impl yo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070451#comment-13070451
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3097:
The package.html still reference
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Juan Antonio Farré Basurte updated SOLR-2632:
-
Priority: Major (was: Minor)
I chose minor for priority because of the "w
Should be fixed in revision: 1150621
(incorrect thread synchronization, mutex was anonymous inner class instance not
test class instance)
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Apache Jenkins
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3340:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3340.patch
Patch w/ 2 test cases showing the bug... they fail on
Buffered deletes are not flushed by RAM or count
Key: LUCENE-3340
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3340
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core/index
OK I tracked this down... indeed we have a bug in trunk (and not 3.x)
whereby buffered deletes are never flushed by RAM or count.
I have unit tests that show the problem... I'll open an issue.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Mike McCandless
wrote
All test passes on my machine last night. I look into it when I've
landed.
Op 25 jul. 2011 10:25 schreef "Uwe Schindler" het
volgende:
> Hi Martijn,
>
> Do you have an idea whats wrong with this test. It fails quite often since
your commit yesterday!
>
> Uwe
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-M
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/18/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.solr.handler.component.DistributedTermsComponentTest.testDistribSearch
Error Message:
Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: So
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/9745/
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.lucene.search.grouping.TermAllGroupHeadsCollectorTest.testRandom
Error Message:
18
Stack Trace:
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 18
at
org.apache.lucene.search.grouping.
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Solr-trunk/1579/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.CloudStateUpdateTest.testCoreRegistration
Error Message:
null
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
at
org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChi
Hi Martijn,
Do you have an idea whats wrong with this test. It fails quite often since your
commit yesterday!
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Apache Jenkins Server [mailto:jenk...@
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/9744/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.search.grouping.TermAllGroupHeadsCollectorTest.testRandom
Error Message:
15
Stack Trace:
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 15
at
org.apache.lucene.search.group
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn van Groningen updated SOLR-2637:
Attachment: SOLR-2637.patch
Added a new patch, that builds further on Tao's work.
*
73 matches
Mail list logo
