The Lucene-trunk nightly build fails almost every night with an OOM in
different test methods, but always related to FST or automaton. Maybe we need a
little bit more heap space when nightly=true/clover enabled?
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMai
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13113167#comment-13113167
]
Chris Male edited comment on LUCENE-1536 at 9/23/11 6:27 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13113184#comment-13113184
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3449:
-
Exactly. Overallocate a bit and allow reaching
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13113167#comment-13113167
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-1536:
Few questions:
- Would it make more sense to us
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male updated LUCENE-1536:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1536.patch
New patch which includes the missed merging, some small tidy-ups and c
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x-java7/502/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.SolrExampleStreamingTest.testCommitWithin
Error Message:
expected:<1> but was:<0>
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<1> but was
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-trunk/1683/
3 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNRTThreads.testNRTThreads
Error Message:
this writer hit an OutOfMemoryError; cannot commit
Stack Trace:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: this writer hit an OutOfMemoryError; cannot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13113127#comment-13113127
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2309:
Committed revision 1174506.
I think this issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13113124#comment-13113124
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-3396:
Plan to commit this tomorrow.
> Make TokenStrea
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/10646/
2 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrExampleBinaryTest.testCommitWithin
Error Message:
expected:<1> but was:<0>
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13113121#comment-13113121
]
JohnWu commented on SOLR-1395:
--
Tom:
yes, you add modifyRequest method in
1)DebugComponent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13113117#comment-13113117
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2309:
bq. In Field.java do we already check that if th
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/10623/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.search.TestRealTimeGet.testStressGetRealtime
Error Message:
java.lang.AssertionError: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13113086#comment-13113086
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on LUCENE-3440:
Hi,
# Which patch do you want me to try
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/10644/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.core.TestJmxIntegration.testJmxOnCoreReload
Error Message:
Number of registered MBeans is not the same as info registry size expected:<58>
but was:<54>
Stack Trace:
junit.framewor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-3446.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.5
Backported to 3.x branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-3448.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Backported to 3.x branch revision: 1174418
> Add FixedBitSet.and(other/DI
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112946#comment-13112946
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3448:
---
Committed missing tests in trunk revision:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112930#comment-13112930
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3445:
I like that approach; we can the
If I start replication by issuing a "fetchindex" command with a "masterUrl"
parameter, it seems to me (by looking at the trunk code) that "abortfetch"
command
would not do anything. It appears to be aborting only when replication is
configured with hardcoded master/slave cores.
Is this intentiona
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112918#comment-13112918
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3445:
-
bq. Well, warm() is a no-op if you don
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112910#comment-13112910
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3445:
bq. warm() is protected. If you
This is what I thought - is that good by everyone?
Sent from my Windows Phone
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:36 AM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] 2.9.4
I thought it was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112902#comment-13112902
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2309:
This looks great! I love all th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112899#comment-13112899
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-2739:
Shalin,
Thanks. So the weird thing on my system
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112894#comment-13112894
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-3449:
--
One could allocate an extra bit on construct
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112897#comment-13112897
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3446:
---
Committed trunk revision: 1174380
> NullP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112894#comment-13112894
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on LUCENE-3449 at 9/22/11 8:48 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
S.L. updated LUCENE-3440:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-3440-2.patch
> FastVectorHighlighter: IDF-weighted terms for ordered fragments
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112887#comment-13112887
]
S.L. commented on LUCENE-3440:
--
Here another patch.
- The calculation of WeightedFragInfo.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112888#comment-13112888
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3448:
---
Committed trunk revision: 1174377
> Add F
DataImportHandler last_index_time does not update on delta-imports
--
Key: SOLR-2790
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2790
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112885#comment-13112885
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3449:
bq. Can you check if this actual
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112879#comment-13112879
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3448:
Patch looks good Uwe!
> Add Fix
Add showItems to LRUCache, display extra details about cached data for both
LRUCache and FastLRUCache
-
Key: SOLR-2789
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/S
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3446:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3446.patch
Patch update.
> NullPointerException in BooleanFilter
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3448:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3448.patch
Updated patch, some improvements. Also limit DISI to numBits
>
I was looking into DUH2 changes (for SOLR-2701) and noticed
DUH2.getStatistics might have a bug
public NamedList getStatistics() {
NamedList lst = new SimpleOrderedMap();
lst.add("commits", commitCommands.get());
if (commitTracker.getTimeUpperBound() > 0) { // isn't this
getDocsUpperB
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112838#comment-13112838
]
Eric Pugh commented on SOLR-1363:
-
Doesn't issue SOLR-2429 which allows you to specify if y
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112820#comment-13112820
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3449:
---
I agree with both of you, so we should fir
hi,
i would like to contribute.
my profile can be seen at:
http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=2145111&trk=tab_pro
regards,
danijel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112809#comment-13112809
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3449:
-
Can you check if this actually slows down thin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112782#comment-13112782
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1536:
Looks good Chris; thanks for bri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112766#comment-13112766
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3449:
I don't like that this adds an a
Make interactive debug mode rollback changes
Key: SOLR-2788
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2788
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: contrib - DataImportHan
I have queries with a big big amount of OR terms. The AND terms are much
more convenient to handle because they can be turned into several filter
queries and cached.
Thinking in innovative solutions I recalled the De Morgan Laws
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Morgan's_laws of Boolean Algebras, an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112703#comment-13112703
]
Karl Wright commented on SOLR-1895:
---
I've opened ticket LUCENE-3450 for the BooleanQuery
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wright updated LUCENE-3450:
Attachment: filter.diff
The filter version of the search component
> BooleanQuery seems broken o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wright updated LUCENE-3450:
Attachment: query.diff
The query version of the search component, which fails the test
> Boolean
BooleanQuery seems broken on trunk
--
Key: LUCENE-3450
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3450
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Karl Wright
Converting a Solr Search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112673#comment-13112673
]
Karl Wright commented on SOLR-1895:
---
bq. I don't understand why you want/need to do that.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112661#comment-13112661
]
Chris Male commented on SOLR-2769:
--
Hi Jan,
Thanks for tackling this. Only 1 comment, ra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112641#comment-13112641
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-1895:
-
bq. A one-to-one conversion of filters to querie
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3449:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3449.patch
Patch also fixing the ugly test code.
> Fix FixedBitSet.nextSet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112621#comment-13112621
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1536:
---
bq. The only dated aspect is the use of Op
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male updated LUCENE-1536:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1536.patch
I think I have managed to update this to trunk. The only dated aspect
The patch I gave for lucene/contrib-build.xml's "javadocs" target was wrong (I
placed the tag outside of the jarify invocation). Here's a fixed
patch:
Index: lucene/contrib/contrib-build.xml
===
--- lucene/contrib/contrib-build.xm
Folks,
I was trying to figure out what explicitly was in my various Solr caches.
After building a custom request handler and using Reflection to gain access to
the private Map's in the caches, I realized that showItems is an option on both
fieldValueCache and FastLRUCache, but isn't an option
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112579#comment-13112579
]
Karl Wright edited comment on SOLR-1895 at 9/22/11 1:49 PM:
bq.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112579#comment-13112579
]
Karl Wright commented on SOLR-1895:
---
bq. A purely negative query in Lucene has always mat
Hi Shai,
On 9/22/2011 at 4:09 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> I looked into how to include the prettify directory with the .jar, and
> the only way I found is to copy the prettify dir to @destDir/prettify
> in "invoke-javadoc" macro. The reason is that when "jarify" is called
> later, it takes only a baseD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112554#comment-13112554
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-3448 at 9/22/11 1:41 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112570#comment-13112570
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3448:
---
I opened LUCENE-3449 because of a stupidne
Fix FixedBitSet.nextSetBit/prevSetBit to support the common usage pattern in
every programming book
---
Key: LUCENE-3449
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3446:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3446.patch
Patch (contains LUCENE-3448) using FixedBitSets new methods. Ope
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3448:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3448.patch
Patch.
One thing I don't like with FixedBitSet (makes code ugly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112552#comment-13112552
]
ofer fort commented on LUCENE-152:
--
sorry for the reopen, but why is the constructor of K
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112550#comment-13112550
]
Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-1895:
bq. Does the DelegatingCollector require filtering
Add FixedBitSet.and(other/DISI), andNot(other/DISI)
---
Key: LUCENE-3448
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3448
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Sub-task
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-3447:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3447.patch
Patch modifies invoke-javadoc to copy the prettify directory under eac
Prettify files are not included with javadoc jars
-
Key: LUCENE-3447
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3447
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112490#comment-13112490
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on LUCENE-3440:
Ah, I see. I saw trunk, but you made the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2780?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn van Groningen resolved SOLR-2780.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Facet count problem : Multi-Select Faceting After grouping res
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2780?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112487#comment-13112487
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on SOLR-2780:
-
Thanks for testing the patch out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112481#comment-13112481
]
S.L. edited comment on LUCENE-3440 at 9/22/11 11:33 AM:
No, can't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112481#comment-13112481
]
S.L. edited comment on LUCENE-3440 at 9/22/11 11:31 AM:
No, can't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112481#comment-13112481
]
S.L. edited comment on LUCENE-3440 at 9/22/11 11:24 AM:
No, can't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112481#comment-13112481
]
S.L. commented on LUCENE-3440:
--
No, can't verify that. It's my first patch, maybe I did some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112475#comment-13112475
]
Karl Wright commented on SOLR-1895:
---
Doing some debugging on the test yields no joy. Her
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112469#comment-13112469
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2309:
-
bq. Looks much more straigtforward now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112467#comment-13112467
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2205:
I ported luceneutil's PKLookupTe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3446:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3446.patch
Patch for trunk.
This patch handles filters returning null DocI
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112448#comment-13112448
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2205:
bq. However due to the growing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112438#comment-13112438
]
Karl Wright edited comment on SOLR-1895 at 9/22/11 9:23 AM:
Her
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112438#comment-13112438
]
Karl Wright commented on SOLR-1895:
---
Here's the diff, which looks perfectly fine to me.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112431#comment-13112431
]
Karl Wright commented on SOLR-1895:
---
While you folks debate, I've been coding, but I am r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112433#comment-13112433
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-2775:
-
Can you please give me a log fra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen resolved LUCENE-3215.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.5
Fixed
- r1173961 - trunk
- r1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112426#comment-13112426
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-2739:
-
Shawn, the test does a full-impo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112423#comment-13112423
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2309:
---
Looks much more straigtforward now. I like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male updated LUCENE-2309:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2309-getTSFromField.patch
Getting back on this after the Analyzer work.
New patc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2780?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112379#comment-13112379
]
Ramzi Alqrainy edited comment on SOLR-2780 at 9/22/11 8:37 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112410#comment-13112410
]
Christian Moen commented on LUCENE-3305:
Thanks for the follow-up, Robert and Sim
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112408#comment-13112408
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3446:
---
Thanks for reporting this bug. Indeed, get
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reassigned LUCENE-3446:
-
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> NullPointerException in BooleanFilter
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-2769:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2769.patch
Took the Java class from google code, and added the required version argumen
I looked into how to include the prettify directory with the .jar, and the
only way I found is to copy the prettify dir to @destDir/prettify in
"invoke-javadoc" macro. The reason is that when "jarify" is called later, it
takes only a baseDir and not a fileset, so 'prettify' must already exist
under
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shuji Umino updated LUCENE-3446:
Description:
BooleanFilter getDISI() method used with QueryWrapperFilter occur
NullPointerExcepti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13112386#comment-13112386
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-1895:
---
Of course, we don't *need* to solve late binding or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2780?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ramzi Alqrainy updated SOLR-2780:
-
Attachment: (was: errors.txt)
> Facet count problem : Multi-Select Faceting After grouping res
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
