I'm not familiar enough with the licenses or procedures for incorporating
another project outside the ASF to speak on that. Others might have input
on that.
Another thing that must be considered about is who would be the
responsibility party to in order to keep the project up-to-date against its
Hi Michael,
Thank you for a great idea to create a nuget package prepare other
things. I'll do that)
Kind Regards,
Alexey Shcherbachev
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:31 PM, michael herndon
mhern...@wickedsoftware.net wrote:
I'm not familiar enough with the licenses or procedures for
I was just looking at the issues for 2.9.4g since I have a bit of time to
put against them in the coming week. They are here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET/fixforversion/12316479. Are
these current? If so I can just keep going in the direction DIGY set to
help close them.
-r
On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-459:
---
Affects Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Italian stemmer (from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13175117#comment-13175117
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-459:
Fixed in 2.9.4g branch.
DIGY
Italian
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy resolved LUCENENET-412.
Resolution: Fixed
2.9.4g is ready to go
DIGY
Replacing ArrayLists, Hashtables etc.
That's a great question - I know a lot of people like the generics, and I don't
really want it to disappear. I'd like to keep it in parity with the trunk. But
I know we also have a goal of making Lucene.Net more .Net like (further than
2.9.4g), and I don't know how that fits in. We are a
On 2011-12-22, michael herndon wrote:
I'm not familiar enough with the licenses or procedures for incorporating
another project outside the ASF to speak on that. Others might have input
on that.
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
If you decide you want to incorporate any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-3653:
Attachment: LUCENE-3653.patch
bq. +1, I think Simon's patch is a good improvement, even
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-3664:
Attachment: LUCENE-3664.patch
initial patch
Speed up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13174703#comment-13174703
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3664:
-
here are some benchmark results using
Make WeightedSpanTermExtractor extensible to handle custom query implemenations
---
Key: LUCENE-3665
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3665
Project: Lucene -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-3665:
Attachment: LUCENE-3665.patch
here is a patch including a testcases. I simply opened up
Sort by defined custom Collator
---
Key: SOLR-2985
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2985
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: search
Affects Versions: 3.5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13174739#comment-13174739
]
Antoine Le Floc'h commented on SOLR-2242:
-
I am using this patch and possibly want
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13174742#comment-13174742
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-2841:
---
Interesting idea, but only update side has been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13174741#comment-13174741
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3653:
---
Hi Simon, for 3.x I agree. In trunk we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13174747#comment-13174747
]
Chris Male commented on SOLR-2841:
--
bq. Another use case for scripting at the top level is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13174753#comment-13174753
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3653:
-
bq. Hi Simon, for 3.x I agree. In
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13174739#comment-13174739
]
Antoine Le Floc'h edited comment on SOLR-2242 at 12/22/11 10:57 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13174739#comment-13174739
]
Antoine Le Floc'h edited comment on SOLR-2242 at 12/22/11 11:02 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13174767#comment-13174767
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3653:
---
+1
Lucene Search not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-3653:
---
Assignee: Simon Willnauer
Lucene Search not scalling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-3653.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.6
Lucene Fields:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved SOLR-2977.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
QueryElevationComponent should support fake
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3662:
Attachment: LUCENE-3662.patch
updated patch with tests. this reveals a bug in moman for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13174883#comment-13174883
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on SOLR-2985:
Could you please post questions to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Otis Gospodnetic resolved SOLR-2985.
Resolution: Invalid
Sort by defined custom Collator
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-2906:
---
Attachment: SOLR-2906.patch
You're right, I had thought it was already done. Now that I see what
Hi,
Some time ago I ported the amazing Bobo Browse library (
http://javasoze.github.com/bobo/ ) from Java to .Net.
We've been using the port since that time, and it works well so far.
Right now it is published here http://bobo.codeplex.com/ (binaries are a
bit outdated, so better check source
Its been pretty quiet as of late. I'd like to merge 3.0.3 into the trunk and
wipe out the branch.
Im going to do this by lazy consensus since responses are a little difficult to
come by. Im going to do this Jan 5th - after the holidays to give everyone the
opportunity to respond if they think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-3605.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.6
revisit
+1 I believe you tagged the latest during release. Code be reverted or a
new branch to create a patch for 2.9.4 if something major happens since we
have scm in place, so I think merging it would not be damaging in any way.
for the 2.9.4g branch, I would do a quick scan to see if there are any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shay Banon updated LUCENE-2292:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2292.patch
Attaching another round of the patch, with improved ref counting on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13174946#comment-13174946
]
Shay Banon commented on LUCENE-3659:
Uwe: Hey, have you looked at LUCENE-2292, this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shay Banon updated LUCENE-2292:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2292.patch
make files protected since they might be needed in classes that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley reopened SOLR-2451:
Delta support was added bit it wasn't completed. In particular, a custom delta
provided is ignored,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley updated SOLR-2451:
---
Attachment: Fix_SOLR-2451_for_a_custom_delta.patch
Enhance SolrTestCaseJ4 to allow tests to
Im not as familiar with the g branch - the notice issue is current, seems like
the general incubator has been digging everyone for it lately.
Im not sure about the anon or the generics unfortunately
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Rory Plaire
Sent: 12/22/2011
Warning missing for features that require stored uniqueKey - MoreLikeThis
-
Key: SOLR-2986
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2986
Project: Solr
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-2986:
---
Attachment: SOLR-2986.patch
Warning missing for features that require stored uniqueKey -
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-trunk/1777/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTypePromotion.testPromotInteger
Error Message:
java.lang.AssertionError: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.AssertionError:
42 matches
Mail list logo
