[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (64bit/jdk-9-ea+153) - Build # 18895 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/18895/ Java: 64bit/jdk-9-ea+153 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC 2 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.TestApiFramework.testFramework Error Message: Stack Trace: java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10090) MBeansHandlerTest assertion fails (test ordering/number dependence)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15851185#comment-15851185 ] Dawid Weiss commented on SOLR-10090: I'm fine with releasing 6.4.1, this patch doesn't

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10035) Admin UI cannot find dataimport handlers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrzej Bialecki updated SOLR-10035: - Fix Version/s: 6.4.1 > Admin UI cannot find dataimport handlers >

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10035) Admin UI cannot find dataimport handlers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrzej Bialecki updated SOLR-10035: - Fix Version/s: (was: 6.4.1) > Admin UI cannot find dataimport handlers > -

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.4.1 RC1

> On 2 Feb 2017, at 23:24, Adrien Grand wrote: > > The current consensus seems to be to pursue the release process since the > failure appears to be a test bug. But I'm good with including this change in > case we had to do a respin. SOLR-10090 indeed is a test bug, it’s triggered by a partic

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10090) MBeansHandlerTest assertion fails (test ordering/number dependence)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15851174#comment-15851174 ] Andrzej Bialecki commented on SOLR-10090: -- This is a test bug - every time {{tes

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7674) java.lang.IllegalStateException: Child query must not match same docs with parent filter. Combine them as must clauses (+) to find a problem doc. docId=2147483647, cla

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15851165#comment-15851165 ] Mikhail Khludnev commented on LUCENE-7674: -- [~tpunder], it usually happens when

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-6246) Core fails to reload when AnalyzingInfixSuggester is used as a Suggester

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Rowe updated SOLR-6246: - Attachment: SOLR-6246.patch I think suggester builds interrupted by core reload or shutdown should fail gr

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.4-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 97 - Failure!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.4-Linux/97/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexingSequenceNumbers.testStressConcurrentCommit Error Message: this IndexWriter is closed Stack Trace: org.ap

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6246) Core fails to reload when AnalyzingInfixSuggester is used as a Suggester

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15851104#comment-15851104 ] jefferyyuan commented on SOLR-6246: --- First I reproduce the issue in current 6.4. Then ver

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-6.4 - Build # 15 - Still Unstable

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-6.4/15/ 5 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.LeaderInitiatedRecoveryOnShardRestartTest.testRestartWithAllInLIR Error Message: There are still nodes recoverying - waited for 330 seconds Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError:

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10009) Explore removing CoreDescriptor from SolrCore

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15851085#comment-15851085 ] David Smiley commented on SOLR-10009: - What you're saying makes sense though I confess

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-10032) Create report to assess Solr test quality at a commit point.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15851079#comment-15851079 ] Mark Miller edited comment on SOLR-10032 at 2/3/17 5:18 AM: He

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10032) Create report to assess Solr test quality at a commit point.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller updated SOLR-10032: --- Attachment: Lucene-Solr Master Test Beasults 02-01-2017-bbc455de195c83d9f807980b510fa46018f33b1b Level

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10008) Move the reference to CoreContainer from CoreDescriptor to SolrCore.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15851042#comment-15851042 ] David Smiley commented on SOLR-10008: - I don't think there are any back-compat guarant

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6246) Core fails to reload when AnalyzingInfixSuggester is used as a Suggester

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15851017#comment-15851017 ] Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-6246: -- [~jefferyyuan], can you see if the LUCENE-7670 change

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (64bit/jdk-9-ea+153) - Build # 18894 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/18894/ Java: 64bit/jdk-9-ea+153 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC 3 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReqParamsAPI.test Error Message: Could not get expected value 'A val' for path 'params/a' full output: {

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9835) Create another replication mode for SolrCloud

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Cao Manh Dat updated SOLR-9835: --- Attachment: SOLR-9835.patch Updated patch to latest source. > Create another replication mode for Solr

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9764) Design a memory efficient DocSet if a query returns all docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850982#comment-15850982 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9764: bq. I think getLiveDocs as implemented here will d

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9764) Design a memory efficient DocSet if a query returns all docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850976#comment-15850976 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9764: --- Commit 64b1d

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9764) Design a memory efficient DocSet if a query returns all docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850974#comment-15850974 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9764: --- Commit 98d1d

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.4-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 96 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.4-Linux/96/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest.testDiff Error Message: expected: but was: Stack Trace: org.junit.ComparisonFailure: e

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (64bit/jdk-9-ea+153) - Build # 18893 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/18893/ Java: 64bit/jdk-9-ea+153 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC 3 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.PeerSyncReplicationTest.test Error Message: expected:<152> but was:<141> Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7674) java.lang.IllegalStateException: Child query must not match same docs with parent filter. Combine them as must clauses (+) to find a problem doc. docId=2147483647, cla

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850640#comment-15850640 ] Tim Underwood commented on LUCENE-7674: --- Thanks [~jpountz]! I'm trying to figure o

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-6.4-Linux (32bit/jdk-9-ea+153) - Build # 95 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.4-Linux/95/ Java: 32bit/jdk-9-ea+153 -server -XX:+UseParallelGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest.testDiff Error Message: expected: but was: Stack Trace: org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected: but was:

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.4.1 RC1

The current consensus seems to be to pursue the release process since the failure appears to be a test bug. But I'm good with including this change in case we had to do a respin. Le jeu. 2 févr. 2017 à 11:02, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) < cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> a écrit : > If there

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7674) java.lang.IllegalStateException: Child query must not match same docs with parent filter. Combine them as must clauses (+) to find a problem doc. docId=2147483647, cla

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850611#comment-15850611 ] Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-7674: -- This particular error means that there is a

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-6.x - Build # 273 - Still Unstable

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-6.x/273/ 9 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFuzzyQuery.testRandom Error Message: Test abandoned because suite timeout was reached. Stack Trace: java.lang.Exception: Test abandoned because suite timeout was reached.

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10090) MBeansHandlerTest assertion fails (test ordering/number dependence)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850574#comment-15850574 ] Kevin Risden commented on SOLR-10090: - [~ab] - Thoughts? > MBeansHandlerTest assertio

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9764) Design a memory efficient DocSet if a query returns all docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850557#comment-15850557 ] David Smiley commented on SOLR-9764: Minor feedback: * I think getLiveDocs as implement

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10091) Support for CDCR using an external queueing service

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Oliver Bates updated SOLR-10091: Description: The idea is to contribute part of the work presented here: https://www.youtube.com/watc

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7674) java.lang.IllegalStateException: Child query must not match same docs with parent filter. Combine them as must clauses (+) to find a problem doc. docId=2147483647, class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim Underwood updated LUCENE-7674: -- Description: Started seeing this error message on a production Solr 6.3.0 system today making

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10091) Support for CDCR using an external queueing service

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Oliver Bates updated SOLR-10091: Description: The idea is to contribute part of the work presented here: https://www.youtube.com/watc

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10091) Support for CDCR using an external queueing service

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Oliver Bates updated SOLR-10091: Affects Version/s: (was: 5.3.1) 6.x > Support for CDCR using an external

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10091) Support for CDCR using an external queueing service

Oliver Bates created SOLR-10091: --- Summary: Support for CDCR using an external queueing service Key: SOLR-10091 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10091 Project: Solr Issue Type: Ne

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 679 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-MacOSX/679/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest.testDiff Error Message: expected: but was: Stack Trace: org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected: but

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10090) MBeansHandlerTest assertion fails (test ordering/number dependence)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dawid Weiss updated SOLR-10090: --- Attachment: SOLR-10090.patch This may be a bit over the top (we could just limit the check to {{delta

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-7674) java.lang.IllegalStateException: Child query must not match same docs with parent filter. Combine them as must clauses (+) to find a problem doc. docId=2147483647, class

Tim Underwood created LUCENE-7674: - Summary: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Child query must not match same docs with parent filter. Combine them as must clauses (+) to find a problem doc. docId=2147483647, class org.apache.lucene.search.Conjun

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-10090) MBeansHandlerTest assertion fails (test ordering/number dependence)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850517#comment-15850517 ] Dawid Weiss edited comment on SOLR-10090 at 2/2/17 9:16 PM: Co

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10090) MBeansHandlerTest assertion fails (test ordering/number dependence)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850517#comment-15850517 ] Dawid Weiss commented on SOLR-10090: Could be! I'll link to it. > MBeansHandlerTest a

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10086) Add Streaming Expression for Kafka Streams

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850511#comment-15850511 ] Susheel Kumar commented on SOLR-10086: -- Thanks, Kevin for putting the example and ste

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux (32bit/jdk-9-ea+153) - Build # 2785 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux/2785/ Java: 32bit/jdk-9-ea+153 -client -XX:+UseSerialGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest.testDiff Error Message: expected: but was: Stack Trace: org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected: but was:

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10090) MBeansHandlerTest assertion fails (test ordering/number dependence)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850496#comment-15850496 ] Kevin Risden commented on SOLR-10090: - I think its caused by SOLR-10035 trying to add

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10090) MBeansHandlerTest assertion fails (test ordering/number dependence)

Dawid Weiss created SOLR-10090: -- Summary: MBeansHandlerTest assertion fails (test ordering/number dependence) Key: SOLR-10090 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10090 Project: Solr

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10090) MBeansHandlerTest assertion fails (test ordering/number dependence)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dawid Weiss updated SOLR-10090: --- Description: This is a regression from SOLR-9947. > MBeansHandlerTest assertion fails (test ordering/n

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.4.1 RC1

+1 to release if we know it's a test issue SUCCESS! [0:48:00.183141] On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > +1 to release. > > My smoke tester also hit that same test failure, but it doesn't look > like a release stopper... > > Mike McCandless >

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10064) The Nightly test HdfsCollectionsAPIDistributedZkTest appears to be too fragile.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850414#comment-15850414 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10064: Commit 52

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (64bit/jdk-9-ea+153) - Build # 18892 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/18892/ Java: 64bit/jdk-9-ea+153 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 2 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.TestApiFramework.testFramework Error Message: Stack Trace: java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9914) SimpleFacets: refactor "contains" check into "SubstringBytesRefMatcher" class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850374#comment-15850374 ] David Smiley commented on SOLR-9914: I don't think we need the interface {{BytesRefFilt

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (SOLR-8028) ConcurrentModificationException thrown from JavaBinCodec

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brian Feldman updated SOLR-8028: Comment: was deleted (was: I also get this issue with Solr 5.5.3 Caused by: java.util.ConcurrentMod

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 3814 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-MacOSX/3814/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC 3 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.core.TestLazyCores Error Message: 1 thread leaked from SUITE scope at org.apache.solr.core.TestL

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9912) SimpleFacets - support facet.excludeTerms parameter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850353#comment-15850353 ] David Smiley commented on SOLR-9912: This looks good but the patch is incomplete; it do

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8028) ConcurrentModificationException thrown from JavaBinCodec

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850348#comment-15850348 ] Brian Feldman commented on SOLR-8028: - I also get this issue with Solr 5.5.3 Caused b

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7673) Add MultiValued[Int/Long/Float/Double]FieldSource for SortedNumericDocValues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850343#comment-15850343 ] David Smiley commented on LUCENE-7673: -- +1 this looks nice Tomás. It'd be nice if {

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9987) Implement support for multi-valued DocValues in PointFields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9987?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tomás Fernández Löbbe updated SOLR-9987: Attachment: SOLR-9987.patch Here is a first patch. Some nocommits and some tests are

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-10018) hl.maxAnalyzedChars should have consistent default across highlighters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Smiley resolved SOLR-10018. - Resolution: Fixed The problem is unlikely to happen again since the patch establishes a highlight

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10018) hl.maxAnalyzedChars should have consistent default across highlighters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850318#comment-15850318 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10018: Commit 1c

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10018) hl.maxAnalyzedChars should have consistent default across highlighters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850312#comment-15850312 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10018: Commit f5

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-Windows (64bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 712 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Windows/712/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest.testDiff Error Message: expected: but was: Stack Trace: org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.4-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 94 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.4-Linux/94/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -client -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest.testDiff Error Message: expected: but was: Stack Trace: org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected: but w

Re: MSDN subscription renewal

> On Feb 2, 2017, at 01:06, Dawid Weiss wrote: > > I've been trying to get my MSDN subscription renewed (useful for > testing on various flavors of Windows) and unfortunately I failed. I > didn't hear back from Ross Gardler > (https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/donated-licenses/msdn

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Windows (32bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 6378 - Failure!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Windows/6378/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -client -XX:+UseParallelGC 2 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCloudRecovery Error Message: Could not remove the following files (in the order of attempts):

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10066) The Nightly test HdfsWriteToMultipleCollectionsTest appears to be too fragile.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850119#comment-15850119 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10066: Commit f6

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10066) The Nightly test HdfsWriteToMultipleCollectionsTest appears to be too fragile.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller updated SOLR-10066: --- Priority: Critical (was: Major) > The Nightly test HdfsWriteToMultipleCollectionsTest appears to be t

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10066) The Nightly test HdfsWriteToMultipleCollectionsTest appears to be too fragile.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850090#comment-15850090 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-10066: This test is expecting to find an HdfsDirectoryFa

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 2784 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux/2784/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.DistributedVersionInfoTest.testReplicaVersionHandling Error Message: Captured an uncaught exception in thread: Thread

[jira] [Closed] (SOLR-10038) Spatial Intersect Very Slow For Large Polygon and Large Index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Smiley closed SOLR-10038. --- Resolution: Invalid 400ms for a page of 100K documents isn't bad; most of your time is I'm sure in re

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-10087) StreamHandler should be able to use runtimeLib jars

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevin Risden resolved SOLR-10087. - Resolution: Fixed > StreamHandler should be able to use runtimeLib jars >

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10087) StreamHandler should be able to use runtimeLib jars

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850023#comment-15850023 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10087: Commit e4

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10087) StreamHandler should be able to use runtimeLib jars

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850021#comment-15850021 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10087: Commit db

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10087) StreamHandler should be able to use runtimeLib jars

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevin Risden updated SOLR-10087: Fix Version/s: master (7.0) 6.5 > StreamHandler should be able to use runtimeLib

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 650 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Solaris/650/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.CollectionsAPIDistributedZkTest.testCollectionsAPI Error Message: Error from server at http://127.0.0.1:42143/solr/awh

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10023) Improve single unit test run time with ant.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15849997#comment-15849997 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-10023: Thanks by way [~steve_rowe]. My beast script wen

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7638) Optimize graph query produced by QueryBuilder

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15849996#comment-15849996 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7638: +1, the new patch looks great!

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10038) Spatial Intersect Very Slow For Large Polygon and Large Index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15849982#comment-15849982 ] samur araujo commented on SOLR-10038: - David, I have 6 millions points in Netherlands

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7274) Add LogisticRegressionDocumentClassifier

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15849959#comment-15849959 ] Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-7274: - +1 thanks [~caomanhdat]. > Add Logist

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-6.4 - Build # 17 - Still Unstable

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-6.4/17/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest.testDiff Error Message: expected: but was: Stack Trace: org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected: but was: at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([F8619F3A

RE: MSDN subscription renewal

No, the same here. It is a long discussion going on about this, it seems to be different for each country you are living in. To me it looks like most people live in a "blacklisted" company (with the blacklist much larger than Trump's). Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen http

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.4.1 RC1

+1 to release. My smoke tester also hit that same test failure, but it doesn't look like a release stopper... Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote: > I see what this is -- Andrzej added another test to this test class > and the test

Re: dev-subscribe

Tim, you sent your request to the wrong address - you want to send an email to dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org instead - see . -- Steve www.lucidworks.com > On Feb 2, 2017, at 5:41 AM, Tim Hughes > wrote: > > ---

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 1113 - Failure!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris/1113/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 3 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.core.TestLazyCores.testNoCommit Error Message: Exception during query Stack Trace: java.lang.RuntimeException: Exception durin

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.4-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 93 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.4-Linux/93/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -client -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest.testDiff Error Message: expected: but was: Stack Trace: org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected: but w

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10089) bin/solr script refuses to start due to PID file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15849859#comment-15849859 ] Markus Jelsma commented on SOLR-10089: -- I never use the start command, so i tried any

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-6.x - Build # 702 - Unstable

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-6.x/702/ 4 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.core.TestCoreDiscovery Error Message: ObjectTracker found 5 object(s) that were not released!!! [MockDirectoryWrapper, MockDirectoryWrapper, SolrCore, MDCAwareThrea

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10089) bin/solr script refuses to start due to PID file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15849852#comment-15849852 ] Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-10089: bq. $ bin/solr stop -a This should be {{-all}},

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 678 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-MacOSX/678/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MBeansHandlerTest.testDiff Error Message: expected: but was: Stack Trace: org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10089) bin/solr script refuses to start due to PID file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15849832#comment-15849832 ] Markus Jelsma commented on SOLR-10089: -- Hello Jan - my machine was behaving very badl

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux (32bit/jdk-9-ea+153) - Build # 2783 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux/2783/ Java: 32bit/jdk-9-ea+153 -server -XX:+UseG1GC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.OverseerTaskQueueTest.testPeekElements Error Message: Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.se

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10089) bin/solr script refuses to start due to PID file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15849806#comment-15849806 ] Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-10089: I cannot reproduce this with {{kill -9}} - the pi

dev-subscribe

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10089) bin/solr script refuses to start due to PID file

Markus Jelsma created SOLR-10089: Summary: bin/solr script refuses to start due to PID file Key: SOLR-10089 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10089 Project: Solr Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10088) Installer script does not put zoo.cfg in SOLR_HOME

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-10088: --- Fix Version/s: master (7.0) 6.5 > Installer script does not put zoo.cfg in SOLR_HOM

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10088) Installer script does not put zoo.cfg in SOLR_HOME

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-10088: --- Attachment: SOLR-10088.patch Simple patch, tested in Docker (Ubuntu). > Installer script does not put

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-10088) Installer script does not put zoo.cfg in SOLR_HOME

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jan Høydahl reassigned SOLR-10088: -- Assignee: Jan Høydahl > Installer script does not put zoo.cfg in SOLR_HOME > --

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9575) Initialize an empty solr-home

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15849769#comment-15849769 ] Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-9575: --- Discovered that Solr's own {{install_solr_service.sh

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10088) Installer script does not put zoo.cfg in SOLR_HOME

Jan Høydahl created SOLR-10088: -- Summary: Installer script does not put zoo.cfg in SOLR_HOME Key: SOLR-10088 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10088 Project: Solr Issue Type: Bug

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 3813 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-MacOSX/3813/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC 5 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.RecoveryZkTest Error Message: Error starting up MiniSolrCloudCluster Stack Trace: java.la

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (32bit/jdk-9-ea+153) - Build # 18890 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/18890/ Java: 32bit/jdk-9-ea+153 -client -XX:+UseG1GC 3 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.lucene.search.grouping.TestGrouping.testRandom Error Message: expected:<2526> but was:<1818> Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<2

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.4.1 RC1

If there were to be a respin (and I understand that is an 'if' at this point) then I'd like to propose for the small (unrelated) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10083 fix to be included. Christine - Original Message - From: dev@lucene.apache.org To: dev@lucene.apache.org At:

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-master - Build # 1228 - Still Unstable

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-master/1228/ 6 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.lucene.analysis.core.TestRandomChains.testRandomChainsWithLargeStrings Error Message: startOffset must be non-negative, and endOffset must be >= startOffset, and offsets must not go ba

  1   2   >