I'm able to run it locally and did some verification.
so it's +1
SUCCESS! [1:17:33.483295]
[image: image.png]
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 5:32 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.3.0
>
> The artifacts can be
+1
SUCCESS! [1:20:38.505055]
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 12:31 PM Gus Heck wrote:
> SUCCESS! [0:54:45.321103]
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 1:01 PM Kevin Risden wrote:
>
>> +1
>> SUCCESS! [1:34:11.886834]
>>
>> Kevin Risden
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 3:43 AM Ignacio Vera wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
SUCCESS! [0:54:45.321103]
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 1:01 PM Kevin Risden wrote:
> +1
> SUCCESS! [1:34:11.886834]
>
> Kevin Risden
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 3:43 AM Ignacio Vera wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> SUCCESS! [1:13:16.262824]
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 6:07 AM Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
>>
Yes, it does need to be updated. I was waiting to do that until I informed the
user list about the change to not publish a PDF any longer which I’m ready to
send now, so I’ll also fix the redirect link.
Cassandra
On Oct 28, 2019, 12:23 PM -0500, Gus Heck , wrote:
> Ah yes I assumed that the
Ah yes I assumed that the original link had come from a good source... OTOH
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/field-types-included-with-solr.html still
needs to be updated to point to 8_2 I think.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 1:01 PM Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : The redirection is wrong, if you
: The redirection is wrong, if you remove "latest" from the urls with 8_1 in
The "redirection" rules appear to be working as designed -- but AFAIK they
were never designed with any idea of having a "latest/" path.
the Latest URL has no is just the page name w/o a version number, not the
page
+1
SUCCESS! [1:34:11.886834]
Kevin Risden
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 3:43 AM Ignacio Vera wrote:
> +1
>
>
> SUCCESS! [1:13:16.262824]
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 6:07 AM Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
> shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> SUCCESS! [1:26:27.659346]
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at
The redirection is wrong, if you remove "latest" from the urls with 8_1 in
them it looks like you get the right page. Also, 8_2 is the latest now so
these are also out of date I think.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:24 AM Gézapeti wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I was trying to access
>
Hi everyone,
I was trying to access
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/latest/field-types-included-with-solr.html
and it got redirected to
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/latest/field-types-included-with-solr.html
which is a 404.
I've tested https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/latest/
It’s been a while. I think this is mostly informational. I was all excited when
the reports were getting s much better, but that was an artifact of some
test environments not being up and running.
When Mark’s test work hits, we’ll probably have to start over.
That said, people SHOULD LOOK
+1
SUCCESS! [1:13:16.262824]
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 6:07 AM Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [1:26:27.659346]
>
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 12:02 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for
11 matches
Mail list logo