forceMerge and unused metadata

A question came across the #solr IRC channel, where the user was seeing fields in their /admin/luke endpoint about a bunch of fields they used to use, but are no longer in any current documents. That URL endpoint provides information about the fields in the index, getting most of that info

Re: [lucene-solr] branch master updated: SOLR-13783: fix failing tests due to NamedList.toString() change

Thanks Munendra, sorry for the noise. On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 1:06 AM wrote: > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > munendrasn pushed a commit to branch master > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene-solr.git > > > The following commit(s)

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.3.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [1:25:00.693515]

Re: CVE-2018-11768 in regards to Solr

Solr interacts with Hadoop only as a client. (except in integration tests). >From the https://hadoop.apache.org/cve_list.html page, this looks like it is only an issue in the fsimage which is server side for the Namenode. I don't think that CVE-2018-11768 applies to Solr directly. CVE-2018-11768

CVE-2018-11768 in regards to Solr

Hello Solr Devs,   I'm looking for some information about CVE-2018-11768, a Hadoop vulnerability. In 7.7.2 Solr ships with Hadoop 2.7.4 which is affected, the closest fixed version is 2.8.5. Solr 8.x ships with Hadoop 3.2 which is not affected.   I was unable to find an Jira item for this, should

Re: Rethinking how we publish the Solr Ref Guide

Thanks for the help! The link was an internal documentation I assumed it was correct. I've updated it in our wiki page. On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 7:57 PM Cassandra Targett wrote: > Yes, it does need to be updated. I was waiting to do that until I informed > the user list about the change to not

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.3.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [2:14:14.583794] On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 9:44 PM Jitendra soni wrote: > I'm able to run it locally and did some verification. > > so it's +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:17:33.483295] > > [image: image.png] > > On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 5:32 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>

Re: Which is the most convenient technique to convert NSF to PST file?

This is spam, right? Designed to show in the web archives. We should - at least - block the user. On the other hand, if somebody was actually interested in extracting information from Lotus Notes, I do have an open-source tool for that. https://github.com/arafalov/Lotus-Notes-Exporter On Tue, 29

Which is the most convenient technique to convert NSF to PST file?

As per the suggestions and experience of the majority of Lotus Notes users, the most convenient technique to convert NSF to PST file type is by using a trustworthy tool. One such type of application is developed by *eSoftTools *and is