Re: [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-13390) Provide Query Elevation Component by default

Isn’t the point of introducing Plugins to Solr to reduce what is on by default? And deal with potentially issues like this? > On Feb 19, 2020, at 2:50 PM, Chris M. Hostetter (Jira) > wrote: > > >[ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.

Re: [jira] [Commented] (SOLR-599) Lightweight SolrJ client

It would be cleanest to avoid compile time deps in solrj-core and have a separate ZkCloudSolrClient in solr-zk. But perhaps easier sort term to just slice it up in the packaging stage when creating pom, and accept ClassNotFound unless you also add solrj-zk to path... I’m not enough into the sol

Re: SolrJ has 29 compile-time dependencies!

I added a comment to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-599 "Lightweight SolrJ client" From June 2008 (!) Let’s continue discussion there? Jan > 19. feb. 2020 kl. 16:19 skrev David Smiley : > > I definitely care about this issue. I like the idea of splitting off a > solr-zk module. Fe

Re: SolrJ has 29 compile-time dependencies!

I definitely care about this issue. I like the idea of splitting off a solr-zk module. Few people know that CloudSolrClient can do a pure HTTP mode to get cluster state indirectly from ZK via Solr, thus no necessity of talking with ZK and what that entails architecturally (security concerns). When

Re: JDK 14 is now in the Release Candidate Phase

Hi Uwe, Any issues to report on your testing of the release candidate ? Rgds,Rory On 10/02/2020 14:52, Uwe Schindler wrote: Hi Rory, Policeman Jenkins is now testing the release candidate build of JDK-14 and JDK-15-ea+9. Uwe - Uwe Schindler uschind...@apache.org ASF Member, Apache

Re: 8.5 release

+1 On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 7:26 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > +1 > > That should give us time to update release docs for the new website too. > > Jan Høydahl > > 18. feb. 2020 kl. 18:28 skrev Adrien Grand : > >  > +1 > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 4:58 PM Alan Woodward > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> It’s

Re: Link doesn't validate

Thanks Jan! On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:10 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > > I fixed that as part of my latest commit for some other parts of the ref > guide. > > Jan > > > 19. feb. 2020 kl. 09:38 skrev Dawid Weiss : > > > > Erick - your latest commit to the solr guide doesn't pass gradlew > > check (and

Re: Link doesn't validate

I fixed that as part of my latest commit for some other parts of the ref guide. Jan > 19. feb. 2020 kl. 09:38 skrev Dawid Weiss : > > Erick - your latest commit to the solr guide doesn't pass gradlew > check (and fails with ant as well): > > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Li

Link doesn't validate

Erick - your latest commit to the solr guide doesn't pass gradlew check (and fails with ant as well): https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/25767/consoleText I don't know how to fix - seems like the link format requires an explicit anchor (?). D. -