I’d be interested in shepherding “newdev” style contributions to being commits.
I’m not comfortable making any deeper changes in Solr, but if it’s a “newdev”
labeled featured, well then it’s probably “newcommitter” friendly as well ;-).
Feel free to tag me on any issues that have patches e
Thanks for the reminder, Marcus. I just added a "newdev" label to this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13438.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 4:55 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> I have tagged some of the issues I have filed but not had bandwidth to
> tackle immediately as ’newdev’, but could probabl
Tomoko:
Agreed. What I’m curious about regardless of LUCENE-9442 is whether
building/distribution Luke is desirable. It’s not clear to me that we _should_
package and distribute Luke with Solr and/or Lucene, It flies in the face of
the “slimmer faster Solr” effort. OTOH, if it’s a package, the
