Thanks!
I created an issue (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9567) and
PR (https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1961), and followed your
suggestion of using the default stop tags and modifying MIGRATE.md.
Given that the "do nothing" behavior has been around for years, I don't se
Please ask for help on the solr-user list. This dev list is for internal
development.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:56 AM Harry Singh Makkar
wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> I want to make a core instance that has a c
Please ask on the solr-user list. I think the answer is "no" but I'm not
sure.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 9:10 PM gopikannan wrote:
> Hi,
> In normal facet request below can be used to filter the facet te
Hi. Block Max WAND is an optimization that can skip docs based on score
thresholds with some hints in the index. If there are no MUST/SHOULD
clauses in the boolean query, then there is no score.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon,
I think whatever changes can be safely brought from that branch into master
should be done now independently of whatever happens to that branch. It
may not be a lot of this branch, but it's something. For example off the
top of my head -- pre-compiling XPath expressions. AIUI, many changes
canno
Ok, good enough for me, thanks for feedback David and Noble, proceeding
with the cherry-picks to 8x
Tim
On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 8:25 PM David Smiley wrote:
> No strong opinion from me. I think the back-compat concern is minor.
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> http://ww
It's been >72h since the vote was initiated (I left some extra time since
the vote started over the weekend) and the result is:
+1 11 (10 binding)
0 0
-1 0
This vote has PASSED
Thanks everyone, I'll start working to finalize the release.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 10:22 AM Michael Sokolov
Hi team,
I want to make a core instance that has a connection with mysql db, but i;m
getting this error:
*org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:
org/apache/solr/util/plugin/SolrCoreAware *
I have placed the solr-dataimporthandler in dist directory and mysql
co
+1 (binding)
SUCCESS! [0:56:16.661736]
On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 2:18 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe
wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> SUCCESS! [1:05:14.591357]
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 1:13 PM Anshum Gupta wrote:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> SUCCESS! [1:00:37.423566]
>>
>> Tried basic indexing and search and r
TBH, a PR with more than 1400 changed files is hard to look at. How many of
us will invest a few weeks at least to really understand it? We should
assume that if we don't bring these changes piece by piece, we risk having
an unstable version of SolrCloud for a while.
When I look at some ongoing (un
We want/need these improvements, for sure!
Agree treating this whole thing as a black box is dangerous. At the same time I
realize that this will be one or a few huge merges anyway!
Rob’s suggestion is interesting! If at all possible to get the branch up to
date with master, and make a PR, then i
11 matches
Mail list logo