Given how recent branch_8_7 was cut, I don't think a RC should be released
Monday. At least one extra day would be prudent. Just my 2-cents.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 4:11 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
> 1. Thi
OK, thanks Gus!
On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 7:34 PM Gus Heck wrote:
> That is only for master, because I was intending on merging back after the
> branch so all aqp related features would stay together and to not drop it
> in 8.7 with no time for it to get used/validated by the motivating use case.
1. This is failing 8.7 builds, e.g.
https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-8.7/3/console,
so yes we should backport to 8.7.
By the way I don't understand why you created a branch_8_x branch in
addition to branch_8x, was it a mistake? The release wizard doesn't seem to
be recomme
cool, thanks Robert, glad it was easy
On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 12:26 PM Robert Muir wrote:
>
> Mike, thanks for bringing this up.
>
> Looks like it's an easy fix, I will take care. I can't run solr tests on my
> machine (they run for hours and always fail), so unfortunately it was caught
> by j
BTw, guidance needed:
1. The doc fixes I need to do for this, should I be backporting them to
branch_8_7, or apply them to branch_8_x and cut a new branch?
2. I still see blocker issues on 8.7 (thanks Ishan!) — is it valid to be
cutting a branch before those are resolved?
Atri
On Mon, 19 Oct 20
Let me take a look tomorrow morning — must be something I broke in the
cherry pick.
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 00:58, David Smiley wrote:
> I don't know. I searched for "missing description:
> org.apache.solr.util.circuitbreaker" in my email (covering our builds), and
> this started happening Octob
I don't know. I searched for "missing description:
org.apache.solr.util.circuitbreaker" in my email (covering our builds), and
this started happening October 16th (2 days ago) on 8.x (not master).
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sun,
Surprisingly it doesn’t fail for me? Local caching?
On Sun, 18 Oct 2020 at 23:08, David Smiley wrote:
> BTW on branch_8x, I see that "ant precommit" fails:
>
> -documentation-lint:
> [jtidy] Checking for broken html (such as invalid tags)...
>[delete] Deleting directory
> /Users/dsmiley/
BTW on branch_8x, I see that "ant precommit" fails:
-documentation-lint:
[jtidy] Checking for broken html (such as invalid tags)...
[delete] Deleting directory
/Users/dsmiley/DevSearch/lucene-solr_8x/lucene/build/jtidy_tmp
[echo] Checking for broken links...
[exec]
[exec] Cra
That is only for master, because I was intending on merging back after the
branch so all aqp related features would stay together and to not drop it
in 8.7 with no time for it to get used/validated by the motivating use case.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020, 1:07 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm con
Mike, thanks for bringing this up.
Looks like it's an easy fix, I will take care. I can't run solr tests on my
machine (they run for hours and always fail), so unfortunately it was
caught by jenkins in this way, sorry.
This change removed the exotic permission that SSD detection needed
(FileStore
I ran a full test suite this morning and got 51 test failures, all in
solr.core. It looks like the same has been happening in Jenkins for
the last couple of days
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Solr-Check-master/.
Based on timing, the only commit that seemed likely was
LUCENE-95
+1, Good idea! It's extra work but the peer-review is important and
prevents confusion for years to come when a poor choice is made.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 1:39 AM Noble Paul wrote:
> I don't think we
13 matches
Mail list logo
