Late to the party but
+1 (binding)
SUCCESS! [1:04:05.374710]
Tried basic indexing and search and everything seems to be working as
expected.
-Anshum
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 9:54 PM Atri Sharma wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.7.0
>
>
> The artifacts can be
Thank you everyone for participating.
Seems like there are no objections to this moving forward. I'll move
forward with this donation.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 8:36 AM Houston Putman
wrote:
> I can answer a few of those!
>
> I assume this is a donation to Solr project, so it will be an
>>
Thanks Ishan, I had misunderstood!
On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 2:12 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Adrien,
> I don't suggest we do so in 8.7, unless there's CVE that need immediate
> addressing. +1 to removing in branch_8x.
> Thanks,
> Ishan
>
> On Fri, 30 Oct,
Not much change this week, still getting considerable noise from the reference
impl.
Raw fail count by week totals, most recent week first (corresponds to bits):
Week: 0 had 110 failures
Week: 1 had 150 failures
Week: 2 had 174 failures
Week: 3 had 142 failures
Failures in
Hi Marcus,
PortSolr3Test is documented "Based off of Solr 3's SpatialFilterTest". Why
do you propose removing it? A quick gloss over it suggests to me this test
is a rather straight-forward test to understand and maintain, and should be
fast. Perhaps the class name should have been something
