Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC1

2021-01-19 Thread Atri Sharma
+1 (binding) SUCCESS! [1:04:15:20393] On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 1:03 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > SUCCESS! [1:05:30.358141] > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 8:25 PM Timothy Potter wrote: >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> SUCCESS! [1:07:15.796578] >> >> >> Also built a *local* Docker image from

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC1

2021-01-19 Thread Ignacio Vera
+1 (binding) SUCCESS! [1:05:30.358141] On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 8:25 PM Timothy Potter wrote: > +1 (binding) > > SUCCESS! [1:07:15.796578] > > > Also built a *local* Docker image from the RC and tested various features > with the Solr operator on K8s, such as the updates to the Prom exporter & >

Re: Add maxFields Option to IndexWriter

2021-01-19 Thread Oren Ovadia
Thanks for the responses and advice. Un-deprecating sounds great, it solves our issue and gives us the flexibility to choose different strategies to deal with it (soft/hard limits etc.). Created LUCENE-9680 to track this, I'll have a patch ready

Re: Solr Docker discussion

2021-01-19 Thread Chris Hostetter
:- _/solr - docker run solr:9.0 (Official Docker Image) :- apache/solr - docker run apache/solr:9.0 : : The benefits of the first are 1) the nice usability of being able to : plainly specify "solr" and 2) the "Docker Official Images" badge on : DockerHub. The downsides are that there are

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC1

2021-01-19 Thread Timothy Potter
+1 (binding) SUCCESS! [1:07:15.796578] Also built a *local* Docker image from the RC and tested various features with the Solr operator on K8s, such as the updates to the Prom exporter & Grafana dashboard for query performance. Looks good! On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:06 PM Houston Putman wrot

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC1

2021-01-19 Thread Houston Putman
+1 SUCCESS! [1:01:28.552891] On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 1:53 PM Cassandra Targett wrote: > I’ve put up the DRAFT version of the Ref Guide for 8.8: > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_8/. > > I also created the Jenkins job for building the 8.8 guide which pushes to > the Nightlies server in ca

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC1

2021-01-19 Thread Cassandra Targett
I’ve put up the DRAFT version of the Ref Guide for 8.8:  https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_8/. I also created the Jenkins job for building the 8.8 guide which pushes to the Nightlies server in case we have edits between now and release (https://nightlies.apache.org/Lucene/Solr-reference-gui

[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC1

2021-01-19 Thread Ishan Chattopadhyaya
Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC1-rev737cb9c49b08f6e3964c1e8a80132da3c764e027 You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/sm

Re: Solr Docker discussion

2021-01-19 Thread Houston Putman
Jan, thanks for clarifying your point on the Dockerfile layers, that makes a lot of sense. David, for your point on using the same Solr binary, I think we could possibly use the same Dockerfile. The difference would be the input Solr tgz that dockerTar puts into the "releases" sub-directory. Inste

Re: Add maxFields Option to IndexWriter

2021-01-19 Thread Michael McCandless
I think it makes sense to un-deprecate that API (why did we deprecate it?), but I'm not sure IW should be in the business of soft/hard limits on field count? I agree such limits make sense if the integrity of the index is at risk, e.g. IW does enforce a max number of unique documents in one index.

Re: [DISCUSS] SIP-12: Incremental Backup and Restore

2021-01-19 Thread Jason Gerlowski
> Announce your intention to proceed with lazy consensus in two business days. I intend to proceed then. : ) I'm going to file JIRAs for the SIP today and start pushing up PRs. Based on how this discussion went I also plan on updating the "SIP" process page to say that lazy consensus can be used

Re: Blog post - Profiling the Lucene nightly benchmarks

2021-01-19 Thread Michael McCandless
Thank you for sharing, Anton! Benchmarking reveals all sorts of fun things, and those flame charts are great fun. I also added very basic JFR profiling results to nightly benchmarks (thanks to Robert for the idea and pointers). Not nearly as pretty and interactive as flame charts :) E.g. see la

Re: 8.8 Release

2021-01-19 Thread Ishan Chattopadhyaya
Thanks for the issue, Jim. Seemed important to get it in. I'll build the RC1 today, but I have a very short time of availability. If I'm unable to wrap it up, Noble will take over tomorrow. On Tue, 19 Jan, 2021, 3:44 pm jim ferenczi, wrote: > Thanks Ishan, the change is merged in the 8.8 branch.

Re: 8.8 Release

2021-01-19 Thread jim ferenczi
Thanks Ishan, the change is merged in the 8.8 branch. I should have said that it's not a blocker per say so if you've already built RC1 and want to proceed with it please go ahead and I'll adapt the change. Le lun. 18 janv. 2021 à 16:30, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> a écrit :