SUCCESS! [0:17:58.084253]
+1 from me. There are a few things I think could be done better (the
demo application... is not really what it should or could be) but
these
have been with us for so long that it's definitely not a showstopper.
D.
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 9:25 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
>
+1, let's leave the option of the possibility
On Sun, 21 Nov 2021, 00:18 David Smiley, wrote:
> +1 to “leave the door open” despite it seeming an awkward endeavor.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 1:15 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Since there is no concrete
+1 to “leave the door open” despite it seeming an awkward endeavor.
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 1:15 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since there is no concrete design available for that as of today, that's
> why I mentioned about "keeping the door open" for 8.12. I'm
Since there is no concrete design available for that as of today, that's
why I mentioned about "keeping the door open" for 8.12. I'm not proposing a
8.12 today, nor am I saying 8.12 is needed. But, in case we need one, we
should have the ability to release it. Anyway, this discussion should
rather
A Solr 8.12 with Lucene 8.11? Not sure of the details on that but
sounds like a giant mess waiting to happen (at the very least, would
require a bunch of complicated changes to the release process). We
need to stop adding features to 8x and focus on 9. I can foresee an
8.11.2 with bug fixes only
I think we should keep the door open for a 8.12 release of Solr (based on
8.11 Lucene). This might mean some split in the codebase, and this can
either happen in the lucene-solr repo or the solr repo (I'm okay with
either).
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 7:59 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
> Uwe brought up
And now also with JDK-11 and JDK-17 combined, thanks to Robert Muir:
https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/5/console
-
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Uwe Schindler
> Sent:
Uwe brought up the question on a the vote thread: we are not going to do a
8.12 release, so what should we do of branch_8x?
I think we should remove it but I remember it was controversial in the
past. I'll start a separate thread.
Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 14:38, Uwe Schindler a écrit :
> Yes. But we won't have a 8.12 release so I assume the branch_8x is dead.
> Maybe we should dass a note to it's readme or delete it?
Yes. But we won't have a 8.12 release so I assume the branch_8x is dead. Maybe
we should dass a note to it's readme or delete it?
Uwe
Am 20. November 2021 13:15:23 UTC schrieb Adrien Grand :
>We need to keep the 8.11 jobs, but I think they can be disabled. We
>typically only enable them when we
We need to keep the 8.11 jobs, but I think they can be disabled. We
typically only enable them when we start discussing doing a new patch
release?
Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 12:51, Uwe Schindler a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I setup my usual release tester job on Policeman Jenkins and it succeeded:
>
Oh did not know. Will extend my Jenkins job.
Uwe
Am 20. November 2021 13:05:43 UTC schrieb Robert Muir :
>I also ran the smoketester with --test-java17
>/usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk, which ran all the checks on both java 11
>and java 17.
>
>SUCCESS! [0:34:34.251839]
>
>On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at
I also ran the smoketester with --test-java17
/usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk, which ran all the checks on both java 11
and java 17.
SUCCESS! [0:34:34.251839]
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 7:25 AM Robert Muir wrote:
>
> I ran the smoketester and it passed:
>
> SUCCESS! [0:18:08.361431]
>
> Thanks to all
I ran the smoketester and it passed:
SUCCESS! [0:18:08.361431]
Thanks to all the hard work on smoke testing, release scripts, and build!
Like Uwe, I plan to do some manual inspection and look for trouble
before voting. But things look to be in a good place.
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 3:25 AM
Ah... darn. I must have overlooked the release wizard thing - I'm
sorry! There may be other things lurking in there too - please ping me
if you need help!
Dawid
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 8:16 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
>
> My statement was inaccurate, I saw the problem when running the smoke tester
Hi,
I setup my usual release tester job on Policeman Jenkins and it succeeded:
SUCCESS! [0:19:00.801641]
See here for log:
https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/4/console
So it looks like technically the release is fine. I will wait a bit with my +1,
because I wanted to
Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.0.0.
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC1-rev-903ee94dc50643299c15dfa954410f3ee4d62075
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u
17 matches
Mail list logo
