On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 5:57 PM Greg Miller wrote:
>
> This is separate from adding hierarchical support. I'm probably not
> communicating the current state well, but here's where SSDV faceting
> does ordinal lookups:
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/c64e5fe84c4990968844193e3a62f4ebbba638ea
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 2:29 PM Robert Muir wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 5:05 PM Greg Miller wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 1:31 PM Robert Muir wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 3:53 PM Greg Miller wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > > TaxonomyReader was recently updated
> > > > t
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 5:05 PM Greg Miller wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 1:31 PM Robert Muir wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 3:53 PM Greg Miller wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > TaxonomyReader was recently updated
> > > to support bulk ordinal resolution (LUCENE-9476), but SSDV faceting is
>
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 1:31 PM Robert Muir wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 3:53 PM Greg Miller wrote:
> >
>
> > TaxonomyReader was recently updated
> > to support bulk ordinal resolution (LUCENE-9476), but SSDV faceting is
> > stuck looking up paths one-at-a-time via SSDV#lookupOrd(ord). This
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 3:53 PM Greg Miller wrote:
>
> TaxonomyReader was recently updated
> to support bulk ordinal resolution (LUCENE-9476), but SSDV faceting is
> stuck looking up paths one-at-a-time via SSDV#lookupOrd(ord). This
> results in a separate TermsEnum#seekExact() call down in
> Luc
Hey folks-
I've been chatting with Marc D'Mello a bit about the SSDV faceting
he's working on (LUCENE-10250) (disclaimer: we both work on Amazon's
Product Search engine). We're trying to figure out where
taxonomy-based faceting has a performance advantage over SSDV, and it
occurred to me that the
Hello,
So... I've been fiddling with the module system together with Uwe,
Tomoko and Chris. Here's a somewhat cleaned-up view of how the module
system can be added to Lucene.
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/533
This is under LUCENE-10255. In short, some things do change:
- note non-conven
It's NOT been >72h since the vote was initiated, but consensus among at least 5
PMC members to release early as an exception due to the log4j fix.
The result is:
+1 13 (12 binding)
0 0
-1 0
This vote has PASSED
Counted votes are: janhoy, rmuir, thelabdude, mdrob, ishan, mikemccand,
uschi
+1
SUCCESS! [1:07:35.83944]
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 1:28 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
> Thanks all, I'll close the vote now and start publishing the release...
>
> If you're a PMC member who planned to vote, but have not yet done so, there
> is still value in expressing your vote in this thread, fur
