Hi,
Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is winding
down, let's hold a vote on this important change.
Once bumped, the next major release of Lucene (whenever that will be) will
require a version of Java greater than or equal to Java 21.
The vote will be open for at
Here is my +1
Uwe
Am 23.02.2024 um 12:24 schrieb Chris Hegarty:
Hi,
Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is winding
down, let's hold a vote on this important change.
Once bumped, the next major release of Lucene (whenever that will be) will
require a version of
+1
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:54 PM Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
> Here is my +1
>
> Uwe
>
> Am 23.02.2024 um 12:24 schrieb Chris Hegarty:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is
> > winding down, let's hold a vote on this important change.
> >
> > Once bum
+1
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 8:54 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:54 PM Uwe Schindler wrote:
> >
> > Here is my +1
> >
> > Uwe
> >
> > Am 23.02.2024 um 12:24 schrieb Chris Hegarty:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 i
+1
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 3:34 PM Benjamin Trent
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 8:54 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:54 PM Uwe Schindler wrote:
>> >
>> > Here is my +1
>> >
>> > Uwe
>> >
>> > Am 23.02.2024 um 12:24 schrieb Chris Hegarty:
>> > > Hi,
>>
+1
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 3:24 AM Chris Hegarty
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is
> winding down, let's hold a vote on this important change.
>
> Once bumped, the next major release of Lucene (whenever that will be) will
> require a version of
I'm fine with this requirement.
+1.
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:24 PM Chris Hegarty
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is
> winding down, let's hold a vote on this important change.
>
> Once bumped, the next major release of Lucene (whenever that w
+1
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 9:34 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
> I'm fine with this requirement.
>
> +1.
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:24 PM Chris Hegarty
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is
>> winding down, let's hold a vote on this important
SGTM!
+1
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 11:04 AM Patrick Zhai wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 9:34 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm fine with this requirement.
>>
>> +1.
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:24 PM Chris Hegarty
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Since the discussion on bumping the Luc
+1
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 11:24, Chris Hegarty
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is
> winding down, let's hold a vote on this important change.
>
> Once bumped, the next major release of Lucene (whenever that will be) will
> require a version of J
Welcome, Chao!
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 7:23 PM Nhat Nguyen
wrote:
>
> Congrats, Chao!
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 1:03 PM Anshum Gupta wrote:
>>
>> Congratulations and welcome, Chao!
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 9:28 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm pleased to announce that Zhang Chao has ac
11 matches
Mail list logo