[Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

Hi, Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is winding down, let's hold a vote on this important change. Once bumped, the next major release of Lucene (whenever that will be) will require a version of Java greater than or equal to Java 21. The vote will be open for at

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

Here is my +1 Uwe Am 23.02.2024 um 12:24 schrieb Chris Hegarty: Hi, Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is winding down, let's hold a vote on this important change. Once bumped, the next major release of Lucene (whenever that will be) will require a version of

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

+1 On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:54 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > > Here is my +1 > > Uwe > > Am 23.02.2024 um 12:24 schrieb Chris Hegarty: > > Hi, > > > > Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is > > winding down, let's hold a vote on this important change. > > > > Once bum

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

+1 On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 8:54 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:54 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > > > > Here is my +1 > > > > Uwe > > > > Am 23.02.2024 um 12:24 schrieb Chris Hegarty: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 i

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

+1 On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 3:34 PM Benjamin Trent wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 8:54 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:54 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: >> > >> > Here is my +1 >> > >> > Uwe >> > >> > Am 23.02.2024 um 12:24 schrieb Chris Hegarty: >> > > Hi, >>

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

+1 On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 3:24 AM Chris Hegarty wrote: > Hi, > > Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is > winding down, let's hold a vote on this important change. > > Once bumped, the next major release of Lucene (whenever that will be) will > require a version of

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

I'm fine with this requirement. +1. On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:24 PM Chris Hegarty wrote: > Hi, > > Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is > winding down, let's hold a vote on this important change. > > Once bumped, the next major release of Lucene (whenever that w

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

+1 On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 9:34 AM Dawid Weiss wrote: > > I'm fine with this requirement. > > +1. > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:24 PM Chris Hegarty > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is >> winding down, let's hold a vote on this important

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

SGTM! +1 On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 11:04 AM Patrick Zhai wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 9:34 AM Dawid Weiss wrote: > >> >> I'm fine with this requirement. >> >> +1. >> >> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:24 PM Chris Hegarty >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Since the discussion on bumping the Luc

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

+1 On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 11:24, Chris Hegarty wrote: > Hi, > > Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is > winding down, let's hold a vote on this important change. > > Once bumped, the next major release of Lucene (whenever that will be) will > require a version of J

Re: Welcome Zhang Chao as Lucene committer

Welcome, Chao! On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 7:23 PM Nhat Nguyen wrote: > > Congrats, Chao! > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 1:03 PM Anshum Gupta wrote: >> >> Congratulations and welcome, Chao! >> >> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 9:28 AM Adrien Grand wrote: >>> >>> I'm pleased to announce that Zhang Chao has ac