Re: Heads up: slow downs with luceneutil (including nightly benchmarks)

2025-08-21 Thread Robert Muir
I thought there was a LogCompilation alternative to PrintCompilation, maybe it behaves better? I've never tried logging XML with it as I don't want XML in my life but maybe it works around that issue. https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/HotSpot/LogCompilation+overview On Thu, Aug 21, 2025, 5:03 PM An

Re: Heads up: slow downs with luceneutil (including nightly benchmarks)

2025-08-21 Thread Anton Hägerstrand
Fwiw, what I saw when digging into inlining last year was that the outputs were rather hard to parse, printed only to stdout(or stderr), and big. For lucenebench I would guess at least tens of thousands of lines. Iirc the formatting etc is hardcoded into the jvm. Anton H On Thu, 21 Aug 2025, 20:0

Re: Heads up: slow downs with luceneutil (including nightly benchmarks)

2025-08-21 Thread Robert Muir
I'm pretty sure running things with the additional debug information will probably cause slowdowns. Do we really care as long as the overhead is reasonably "fair"? On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 8:12 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > > This would be great, do you know if this can be done without slowdown? > > On

Re: Heads up: slow downs with luceneutil (including nightly benchmarks)

2025-08-21 Thread Adrien Grand
This would be great, do you know if this can be done without slowdown? On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 9:30 PM Robert Muir wrote: > I think the nightly benchmarks may need to get beefed up with some > compiler output so we can better see what is happening? openjdk > supports many flags to print the comp