[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16844183#comment-16844183
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8805:
--
The patch looks good in general. In SolrDocumentFetcher
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16844029#comment-16844029
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8791:
--
bq. Yes, We run CPU intensive ML models to rescore hits
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16844013#comment-16844013
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8757:
--
I think we could add an assertion
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16844001#comment-16844001
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8770:
--
This is great. I wonder how useful computing the score
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16843979#comment-16843979
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8804:
--
This makes sense to me. [~mikemccand] Any objections
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16843945#comment-16843945
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8689:
--
[~Dmitry Popov] Since your codec only iterates on ones
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16843931#comment-16843931
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8805:
--
I like how passing a String to stringField makes the API
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16843910#comment-16843910
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-4012:
--
bq. My thought is that each query parser could potentially
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16843876#comment-16843876
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8757:
--
[~atris] Your last patch sorts in reverse order of docBase
Hi Romaric,
You are right, computeNorm is the right place to compute and record
the number of unique terms of a document. Your computeNorm function
would look something like this:
@Override
public final long computeNorm(FieldInvertState state) {
return
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16840620#comment-16840620
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8799:
--
[~atris] I don't have a checkout of the code locally so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16839913#comment-16839913
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8799:
--
What does it do differently than RandomIndexWriter#commit
Welcome Mike!
Le lun. 13 mai 2019 à 15:12, Dawid Weiss a écrit :
> Hello everyone,
>
> Please join me in welcoming Michael Sokolov as Lucene/ Solr committer!
>
> Many of you probably know Mike as he's been around for quite a while
> -- answering questions, reviewing patches, providing insight
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16838371#comment-16838371
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-7697:
--
I am not, but [~jtibshirani] recently mentioned to me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16838363#comment-16838363
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8757:
--
Yes. Top-docs collectors are expected to tie-break by doc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-7697.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Oops, actually I've done what I had in mind in LUCENE-8059, I had
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16838136#comment-16838136
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8791:
--
I like the idea of a collector-based rescorer so that you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16838132#comment-16838132
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8795:
--
TestBKD
(https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/master
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16838131#comment-16838131
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8757:
--
I think we need to sort by docBase before constructing
+1 SUCCESS! [1:42:06.213620]
Javadocs and the changelog look good too.
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 3:56 PM Michael McCandless
wrote:
>
> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:50:14.775863]
>
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:37 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> wrote:
>>
The Russia polygon seems to be something else? It slowed down on April
12th and then a bit more on April 20th while you only switched to
OpenJDK11 on April 23th?
However some other slowdowns seem to happen at the same time as the
switch to OpenJDK 11 and haven't been addressed by the change of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-8795.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
Closing since this looks like a JVM bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16834714#comment-16834714
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-7840:
--
+1
> BooleanQuery.rewriteNoScoring - optimize away
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8795?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16834709#comment-16834709
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8795:
--
I just did a quick review, here is the code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16827026#comment-16827026
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8776:
--
I am sorry that this change broke your use-case
Adrien Grand created LUCENE-8779:
Summary: MinHashFilter generates invalid terms
Key: LUCENE-8779
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8779
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16824974#comment-16824974
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8776:
--
I'd rather keep this check for the reasons Robert mentioned
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16821800#comment-16821800
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8768:
--
[~thetaphi] Any thoughts about this?
> Javadoc sea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-8154.
--
Resolution: Implemented
[~erickerickson] Indeed, this is superseded by LUCENE-8738.
> T
I pushed a fix. We were randomly adding term vectors while the test
later asserted that term vectors were disabled.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 3:34 AM Apache Jenkins Server
wrote:
>
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-8.x/144/
>
> 1 tests failed.
> FAILED:
>
+1 to do a 8.1 soon too, thanks Ishan for volunteering! I'm expecting
you'd build a RC soon after cutting the branch?
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 10:08 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
wrote:
>
> +1 for a 8.1 soon. I can volunteer for RM.
> Does 30 April (about 2 weeks from now) sound reasonable for a branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16820188#comment-16820188
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8765:
--
Good catch! This patch seems to have been created off
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16819305#comment-16819305
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8759:
--
Maybe the test could explicitly test both normal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16819154#comment-16819154
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8759:
--
I gave a try at simplifying this a bit and have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16818980#comment-16818980
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8759:
--
I'm wondering whether the logic could be simplified
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16818207#comment-16818207
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8738:
--
+1 on the suggested short-term workaround
> Bump mini
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16817665#comment-16817665
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8738:
--
Feel free to send it, +1 for tomorrow CEST.
> Bump mini
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16817616#comment-16817616
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8738:
--
Thanks Uwe. Sorry for the late reply, +1 to send an email
houldn’t modify from writes is a +1.
>>
>> I’m -1 for removing branches.
>>
>> Erick
>>
>> P.S. And I do note that you carefully did _not_ include 6_6 or 7_7 so we can
>> still do the point releases.
>>
>>
>> > On Apr 5, 2019, at 7:47 A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16816072#comment-16816072
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8738:
--
Agreed it would be simpler to just call queueCoreClose
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16815143#comment-16815143
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8725:
--
+1 to the patch, let's maybe make it internal rather than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16814823#comment-16814823
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8738:
--
[~thetaphi] I tested Eclipse indeed. I only had issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16814577#comment-16814577
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8738:
--
[~thetaphi] Do you know what still needs to be done before
Adrien Grand created LUCENE-8762:
Summary: Lucene50PostingsReader should specialize reading
docs+freqs with impacts
Key: LUCENE-8762
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8762
Project
Adrien Grand created LUCENE-8760:
Summary: Reconsider the best way to encode postings now that we
can skip non-competitive hits
Key: LUCENE-8760
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8760
Adrien Grand created LUCENE-8759:
Summary: BlockMaxConjunctionScorer's simplified way of computing
max scores hurts performance
Key: LUCENE-8759
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8759
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-8619.
--
Resolution: Not A Problem
This isn't a problem anymore now that Ignacio rewrote the merging
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16813565#comment-16813565
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8738:
--
Sorry Uwe, I don't understand what you are suggesting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16813445#comment-16813445
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8738:
--
Apparently the issue can be worked around by calling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16813346#comment-16813346
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8738:
--
There seems to be issues with links to the standard API. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16813211#comment-16813211
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-7386:
--
For the record I had to disable the verification of scores
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16813199#comment-16813199
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8708:
--
Thanks Atri for giving it a try! This change is a bit too
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16813164#comment-16813164
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8753:
--
bq. BlockTree and UniformSplit had the same QPS for Term
Congratulations, Tomoko! Welcome!
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:20 PM Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please join me in welcoming Tomoko Uchida as the latest Lucene/Solr committer!
>
> She has been working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2562 for
> several years with awesome
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16811015#comment-16811015
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8747:
--
Is getWeight really needed or could you pull an iterator
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16810987#comment-16810987
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8749:
--
I'm wondering whether customizing slices would actually
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16810980#comment-16810980
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8751:
--
+1
> Weight#matches should use the scorerSuppl
Removing branches proved a bit controversial in the past, see
https://markmail.org/message/6ah3m6zd6v3ik3ie for instance.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 3:24 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
> On 4/5/2019 3:19 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> > Apparently it is possible to ask INFRA to mark branches as
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16810659#comment-16810659
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8701:
--
+1 it looks good. Maybe we should call searcher#rewrite
Hello,
Apparently it is possible to ask INFRA to mark branches as
protected[1]. Should we do it for branches that are not expecting new
releases anymore? I think it would make things less trappy. For
instance, backporting to branch_7x is almost for sure a mistake since
we are not going to release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16810629#comment-16810629
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8688:
--
I backported to branch_7_7 as well in case we do a new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand updated LUCENE-8688:
-
Fix Version/s: 7.7.2
> Forced merges merge more than necess
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16808813#comment-16808813
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8753:
--
I haven't read the pdf or the patch yet. The LowTerm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16808610#comment-16808610
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8738:
--
+1 The other part that needs reviews is the replacement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16808503#comment-16808503
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8738:
--
+1 to disable jtidy for now
> Bump minimum Java vers
release
> todo guide, and generate them as soon as the artifacts are published?
> https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo#Generate_Backcompat_Indexes
> Regards,
> Ishan
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 12:28 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
>>
>> Ishan, have you seen
Ishan, have you seen these build failures?
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 7:27 AM Apache Jenkins Server
wrote:
>
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-master/1297/
>
> No tests ran.
>
> Build Log:
> [...truncated 23436 lines...]
> [asciidoctor:convert] asciidoctor: ERROR:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16808415#comment-16808415
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8738:
--
Currently the build prevents tidy from running if the Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16807848#comment-16807848
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8738:
--
[~thetaphi] I'm curious if you have an idea how to make
In my opinion, we should test all versions between the minimum
required version and the greatest version at the time of a release. So
my preference would be to keep testing on Java 8 and 9, possibly less
frequently.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:51 PM Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> What do people think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16804163#comment-16804163
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8732:
--
If someone has time to look, I think we have a similar
+1 to raise a JIRA. There is an easy workaround on the user side by
using a recent JVM, but at the same time the change to the code looks
safe. Does it affect 6.6? I see there is an ongoing thread about
getting 6.6.6 out.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:05 PM Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> From the user’s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16801064#comment-16801064
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8739:
--
Zstd looks great indeed. We'd need a pure Java impl if we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16801036#comment-16801036
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8738:
--
You argued to keep this code around in the vote thread
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16800943#comment-16800943
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8738:
--
[~thetaphi] Feel free to heavy commit, I don't plan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16800921#comment-16800921
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8738:
--
Hi Uwe, thanks for this checklist. I have started looking
release being a ways off;
>> this makes the decision pretty easy.
>>
>> ~ David Smiley
>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 2:23 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
>>>
>>
Adrien Grand created LUCENE-8738:
Summary: Bump minimum version requirement to 11
Key: LUCENE-8738
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8738
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-8737.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Fix Version/s: (was: Positions Branch)
I'm assuming
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16798867#comment-16798867
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8732:
--
+1 to the approach. Should we keep returning the sub scorer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16798313#comment-16798313
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8733:
--
I have mixed feelings. I have never found the "@since
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16798295#comment-16798295
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8733:
--
Most of the classes whose documentation is updated
of the release then we should do it. Just because it makes things
easier to reason about and to test. And then doing it early gives us
time to see how we can use new Java features to make Lucene/Solr
better.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 1:49 AM Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
> On 3/19/2019 12:22 PM, Adrien Grand
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16796413#comment-16796413
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8731:
--
Let's use the "@Deprecated" annotation on
Hello,
Now that Lucene/Solr 8.0 has shipped I'd like us to consider requiring
Java 11 for 9.0, currently the master branch. We had 18 months between
7.0 and 8.0, so if we assume a similar interval between 8.0 and 9.0
that would mean releasing 9.0 about 2 years after Java 11, which
sounds like a
Adrien Grand created SOLR-13334:
---
Summary: Expose FeatureField
Key: SOLR-13334
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13334
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16796063#comment-16796063
]
Adrien Grand commented on SOLR-13289:
-
+1 to expose these optimizations.
I like option 1 better too
FYI I disabled 8.0 jobs on ASF Jenkins except the one about the reference guide.
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16795905#comment-16795905
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-7958:
--
Thanks for sharing [~hermes]. I should resurrect the above
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand updated LUCENE-8150:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-8150.patch
> Remove references to segments.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16795886#comment-16795886
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8150:
--
Here is a new patch based on the above comments
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16793604#comment-16793604
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8150:
--
I could work around it now that I know of this trap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16793597#comment-16793597
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8150:
--
Indeed! I think it's due to the fact that I'm always
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-8688.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: master (9.0)
8.1
Merged. Thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16793420#comment-16793420
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8725:
--
I think it was done this way to make sure that equals
lr Search Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:02 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
>>
>> I organized existing items of the Lucene release notes into sections
>> and added a new item about FeatureField,
>> LongPoint#newDist
Adrien Grand created LUCENE-8727:
Summary: IndexSearcher#search(Query,int) should operate on a
shared priority queue when configured with an executor
Key: LUCENE-8727
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16792497#comment-16792497
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8688:
--
bq. otherwise the case of merging from a single segments
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16792478#comment-16792478
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8725:
--
Is my assumption correct that you are interested
te in 8.1 and remove in 9 without any problems. I
> opened the issues to ensure that we didn’t keep carrying deprecated code
> through any further releases.
>
>
> On 7 Feb 2019, at 06:43, David Smiley wrote:
>
> I want to ensure people are aware of two issues "Remove deprec
701 - 800 of 6271 matches
Mail list logo
