[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929567#action_12929567
]
George Aroush commented on LUCENENET-380:
-----------------------------------------
Few points:
1) Work on ASF projects need to be done at ASF. Please use this JIRA issue and
the mailing list to communicate questions, report progress and results.
2) The converted files need to be attached to this JIRA issue, so we have a
record of it and able to evaluate by all.
3) Prescott point of highlighting pre / post processing work is a good one and
important. Please write this up as you work on this task.
4) More than one person can work on this JIRA issue, just keep everyone posted.
My expected outcome of this JIRA issue is:
1) What pre / post processing did you use if any? It would also help to show
the raw output with and without the pre processing.
2) How close is the result of those 5 attached files to the existing converted
C# files? This includes the layout of the code (was anything lost or
considerably change?) but most importantly, are the public APIs consistent?
The reason why I picked those 5 files is because those are the ones JLCA has
some of the most issues with, so it should be a good barometer seeing how
Sharpen does.
> Evaluate Sharpen as a port tool
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENENET-380
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380
> Project: Lucene.Net
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: George Aroush
> Attachments: IndexWriter.java, NIOFSDirectory.java, QueryParser.java,
> TestBufferedIndexInput.java, TestDateFilter.java
>
>
> This task is to evaluate Sharpen as a port tool for Lucene.Net.
> The files to be evaluated are attached. We need to run those files (which
> are off Java Lucene 2.9.2) against Sharpen and compare the result against
> JLCA result.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
