Congratulations!!
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 8:49 PM Michael Gibney
wrote:
> Welcome, Chao!
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 7:23 PM Nhat Nguyen
> wrote:
> >
> > Congrats, Chao!
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 1:03 PM Anshum Gupta
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Congratulations and welcome, Chao!
> >>
> >> On
This is so cool! Thank you Mike for developing and hosting these services!
Julie
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 9:40 AM Michael Wechner
wrote:
> thank you very much!
>
> Am 19.02.24 um 17:39 schrieb Michael McCandless:
>
> Hi Team,
>
> ~1.5 years ago (August 2022) we migrated our Lucene issue
Congratulations Stefan!!
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 1:09 AM Alan Woodward wrote:
> Welcome Stefan!
>
> On 18 Jan 2024, at 15:53, Michael McCandless
> wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
> I'm pleased to announce that Stefan Vodita has accepted the Lucene PMC's
> invitation to become a committer!
>
> Stefan,
Congratulations!!
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 11:32 AM Nhat Nguyen
wrote:
> Congrats and welcome, Feng!
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 11:09 AM Luca Cavanna
> wrote:
>
>> Congrats and welcome!
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 7:42 PM Dawid Weiss
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Congratulations and welcome, Feng!
Congratulations Luca!!
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 1:45 AM Bruno Roustant
wrote:
> Welcome, congratulations!
>
> Le ven. 20 oct. 2023 à 10:02, Dawid Weiss a
> écrit :
>
>>
>> Congratulations, Luca!
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 7:51 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
>>
>>> I'm pleased to announce that Luca
+1
SUCCESS! [0:41:00.311710]
Julie
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 9:38 AM Anshum Gupta wrote:
> +1
>
> Smoke tester is happy!
>
> SUCCESS! [0:46:49.090567]
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 10:49 PM Patrick Zhai wrote:
>
>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.8.0
>>
>> The artifacts can be
Congratulations and welcome Ben!!
And hello from another aspiring mathematician turned software engineer :)
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 9:40 AM Benjamin Trent
wrote:
> Hey y'all!
>
> This is truly an honor!
>
> Well, I am Ben Trent and have been writing code for over a decade now.
> Which I know
+1 from me for a bugfix release once we've solidified testing. Thanks to
everyone working on improving tests and static analysis -- this now is our
second time encountering a bad arithmetic bug and it's important to get
ahead of these issues!
Julie
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 8:26 AM Robert Muir
Hi Patrick, this seems like an important topic to explore!
Speeding up merging by allowing multiple graphs per segment could be an
acceptable compromise. We'd probably have to run a large-scale experiment
to get a good handle on the performance trade-off. My intuition though is
that it could
Thank you Ignacio for taking over as release manager! I ran into some
issues with my signing key and Ignacio saved the day.
Robert, I understand your perspective. I uploaded a draft PR with a monster
test you could try out: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11867. It
requires downloading an
I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_9_4
Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
* Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
* All issues accepted for backporting should
ank you for volunteering to fix (hangs head in
> shame). I guess I'll see where the bug is soon ...
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 2:50 PM Michael Wechner
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 :-)
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > Am 18.10.22 um 19
Hi everyone,
We recently discovered a severe bug in the 9.4 release in the kNN vectors
format: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11858. Explaining the
problem: when ingesting a lot of data, or when performing a force merge,
segments can grow large. The format validation code accidentally
Congratulations Luca!!!
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 10:14 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
> Oh, long overdue - congratulations and welcome, Luca.
>
> Dawid
>
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 7:04 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
>
>> I'm pleased to announce that Luca Cavanna has accepted the PMC's
>> invitation to become a
+1 SUCCESS! [0:56:55.325499]
Thanks Mike for all your work as release manager!
I initially ran into an MD5 mismatch when verifying maven artifacts
("RuntimeError: MD5 digest mismatch"). But switching from python 3.10 to an
older version resolved it. I probably just have something off in my
uld not be counted in the timings. Are you
> saying that the recall was affected??
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 6:12 PM Julie Tibshirani
> wrote:
>
>> Using the ann-benchmarks framework, I still saw a similar regression as
>> Mayya between 9.3 and 9.4. I inv
Using the ann-benchmarks framework, I still saw a similar regression as
Mayya between 9.3 and 9.4. I investigated and found it was due to
"KnnGraphTester to use KnnVectorQuery" (
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/796), specifically the change to the
warm-up strategy. If I revert it, the
Hello! I also ran some local vector search benchmarks on branch_9_4. I
found that given the same parameters, there is a significant change in
recall/ QPS before and after the initial "enable quantization to 8-bit"
backport (https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1054). Here's an example
with M=16,
Hi Mike, I've been working on follow-up refactors to the vector encoding
work we just added in 9.4 (https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/1054) and
had a couple things to check with you.
First, I opened a PR to remove LeafReader#searchNearestVectorsExhaustively (
A big thank you Tomoko for all your work! It's great how everything went so
smoothly.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 5:37 AM Tomoko Uchida
wrote:
> > Given how many difficult aspects there were on the way, you can probably
> offer jira-github transition services and make them your business! :)
>
> I
Thank you Marcus for raising this, it's an important topic! On the issue
you filed, Mike pointed to the JIRA ticket where we've been discussing this
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10471) and suggested
commenting with the embedding models you've heard about from users. This
seems
Congratulations Vigya!
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 6:34 AM Mayya Sharipova
wrote:
> Congratulations and welcome Vigya!
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:31 AM Nhat Nguyen
> wrote:
>
>> Welcome, Vigya!
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:09 AM Dawid Weiss
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Congratulations and
+1 SUCCESS! [0:52:18.736747]
Thanks Ignacio for being release manager!
Julie
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 7:53 AM Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:22:20.199080]
>
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 10:46 AM
nd writers behave, while the format on disk stays the same.
> Specifically for the release 9.3, Alessandro also introduced some changes
> <https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/926>to codec readers while the
> format on disk stayed the same.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 20,
Hello everyone,
We had preemptively created a Lucene93Codec to support the vector search
changes (Mike's work in LUCENE-10577, Mayya's work in LUCENE-10592).
However neither of these changes made it for 9.3, so there have not been
any real format changes-- Lucene93Codec is the same as
+1 (PMC) from me too!
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 8:47 AM Michael Sokolov wrote:
> Sorry I missed the first vote I think; also +1(pmc) from me. I'd be OK
> with some issues (esp. closed ones) being orphaned in the old system
> too.
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 9:20 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
> >
> >
> >
Congratulations Greg!!
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 7:22 AM Ignacio Vera wrote:
> Welcome Greg!
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 1:40 PM 陆徐刚 wrote:
>
>> Congratulations, Greg.
>>
>> Xugang
>>
>> > 在 2022年6月7日，17:48，Dawid Weiss 写道：
>> >
>> > Congratulations and welcome, Greg.
>>
>>
Welcome Xugang!!
On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 10:04 AM David Smiley wrote:
> Welcome Lu!
>
+1 SUCCESS! [0:59:11.553919]
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 3:30 PM Michael Gibney
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding, java 11 and 17)
> SUCCESS! [2:01:03.089817]
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:24 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
>
>> +1 SUCCESS! [1:21:57.197735]
>>
>> I tested with Java 11 and Java 17.
>> CHANGES look
+1 SUCCESS! [0:57:28.654665]
Thanks Alan!
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 1:51 PM Anshum Gupta wrote:
> +1 SUCCESS! [0:59:19.002348]
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 5:59 AM Alan Woodward
> wrote:
>
>> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.2.0
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>
>>
I pushed a fix yesterday (both main and branch_9x), sorry for the noise!
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:03 PM Dawid Weiss wrote:
> This is errorprone-caused failure:
>
> > Task :lucene:core:compileTestJava FAILED
>
>
I don't have much to add to the (already very detailed!) discussion, just
wanted to add my support for the idea of moving to GitHub. I've had a good
experience with GitHub issues for other repos I contribute to and find the
mark-up language comfortable and expressive. I also think switching to
nothing that needs to be changed on lucece's end. We're
>> still having trouble running the smoke test on Amazon's machine, but I've
>> tried it on my own machine and it passed.
>> >
>> > So here's my +1. SUCCESS! [0:59:35.291572]
>> >
>> >
&
Hi everyone, people have run into several test failures, here's a summary
to make it easier to follow:
1. Some tests can be very slow with certain random parameters, and this
can cause the smoke tester to take several hours -- this seems like a
test-only problem, and we're working to
ome other basic indexing/search sample app code that I
> was playing around with.
>
> Here's my +1 to release Lucene 9.1.0 RC2.
>
> SUCCESS! [1:05:31.299375]
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:27 PM Julie Tibshirani
> wrote:
>
>> Please vote for release candidate 2 fo
Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.1.0
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.1.0-RC2-rev-5b522487ba8e0f1002b50a136817ca037aec9686
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u
LUCENE-10469 in the next release
> candidate. It is a performance bug that manifests with
> MatchAllDocsQuery wrapped inside of a ConstantScoreQuery.
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 2:37 AM Julie Tibshirani
> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you Uwe, that makes sense. Too bad I can't me
natures or mark them as valid (you tell
> GPG that you know the person). Jenkins cannot do this – he isn’t a person
> that can meet you!
>
>
>
> Uwe
>
>
>
> -
>
> Uwe Schindler
>
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>
> https://www.thetaphi.d
very release)
> with
> > Policeman Jenkins. There’s a job to execute smoke tester and it takes as
> > parameters the branch name and the version number (incl. hash).
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> This worked
Hi Dawid, I did a little digging and this looks like a bug that could
affect users. I think since we are still early in the vote for RC1, we
should call it off and spin RC2. I will backport your change to branch_9_1.
Julie
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:39 PM Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
> This failure
Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.1.0
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.1.0-RC1-rev-a6114b532a273e370528675d551d3ddfa02f4679
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u
ie,
>>
>> I'm waiting for an independent review from Uwe (or anybody else using
>> Windows?). Like I said, it's a relatively safe change - I've tested it
>> myself, but better safe than sorry.
>>
>> Dawid
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 11:51 PM Julie Tibs
Hi everyone, a quick update on the 9.1 release. I ran into some smoke
tester failures that we are almost done sorting out. Just one issue remains
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10461) -- once that's
resolved we can move forward with RC1.
Julie
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 5:31 PM Julie
Branch branch_9_1 has been cut and versions updated to 9.2 on stable branch.
Please observe the normal rules:
* No new features may be committed to the branch.
* Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be
committed to the branch. However, you should submit all patches
will ever match, ergo no highlights will be
> returned, so it seems fine that it is unable to extract terms from the
> query.
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 2:00 PM Julie Tibshirani (Jira)
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > [
> https://is
;>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 9:05 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 8:43 AM Michael Wechner
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>&
Hello everyone,
Would there be support for releasing Lucene 9.1 soon? It has been ~2.5
months since 9.0 was released and we already have a long list of new
features, optimizations, and bug fixes (
https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/branch_9x/lucene/CHANGES.txt).
If so, I am happy to take a
I opened https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/690 to address the failure.
In the meantime I'll mute the test since it's quite noisy.
Julie
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 2:30 PM Policeman Jenkins Server <
jenk...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-main-Linux/32885/
>
PU", are there other limiting factors re more
> dimensions?
>
> Thanks
>
> Michael
>
> Am 14.02.22 um 21:53 schrieb Julie Tibshirani:
>
> Hello Michael, the max number of dimensions is currently hardcoded and
> can't be changed. I could see an argument for in
1024?
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyb6w5c4x5rjt34k3w7zqn3yp5wvf33o
>
> Thanks
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> Am 14.02.22 um 17:45 schrieb Julie Tibshirani:
>
> Hello Michael, I don't have personal experience with these models, but I
> found this article insightful:
> http
Hello Michael, I don't have personal experience with these models, but I
found this article insightful:
https://medium.com/@nils_reimers/openai-gpt-3-text-embeddings-really-a-new-state-of-the-art-in-dense-text-embeddings-6571fe3ec9d9.
It evaluates the OpenAI models against a variety of existing
Welcome!!
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 11:00 AM Marcus Eagan wrote:
> Congratulations Feng!
>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 10:51 AM Anshum Gupta
> wrote:
>
>> Congratulations and welcome, Feng!
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 1:09 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
>>
>>> I'm pleased to announce that Guo Feng has
+1 from me too, this will be a really helpful feature. I've done some
background research and found a couple aspects that are tricky. If the
filter only matches a small percentage of documents, HNSW can quickly
degrade to a brute-force scan. With live docs this isn't a big problem,
because our
Welcome Patrick
Julie
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 7:58 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
> Welcome Patrick!
>
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 5:04 PM Namgyu Kim wrote:
> >
> > Congratulations and welcome, Patrick! :D
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 6:12 PM Dawid Weiss
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello everyone!
> >>
>
+1
SUCCESS! [0:21:17.201039]
Julie
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 6:22 AM Michael McCandless
wrote:
> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:06:38.581719]
>
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 3:16 AM Ignacio Vera wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> SUCCESS! [0:18:22.596596]
>>
>> On
Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 2:45 PM Ignacio Vera wrote:
>
>> Congratulations Julie!
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 10:03 AM Alan Woodward
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Congratulations and welcome!
>>>
>>> - Alan
>>>
>>> > On 30 Nov 2021,
+1 (nonbinding)
SUCCESS! [1:04:58.967300]
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 7:12 AM David Smiley wrote:
> +1
> SUCCESS! [0:57:23.948714]
>
Congratulations Michael!!
On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 8:04 AM Alan Woodward wrote:
> Congratulations and welcome, Michael!
>
> > On 6 Oct 2021, at 14:33, Dawid Weiss wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone!
> >
> > Please welcome Michael Gibney as the latest Lucene committer. Michael
> > - it's a tradition
This turned out to be more than a test bug -- I opened
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/251.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 4:57 AM Michael Sokolov wrote:
> Looks like a test bug - we sometimes index docs without a vector in
> the test, but don't account for that when counting results. I'll try
>
This reproduces for me on branch_8x and seems to have started failing with
commit e09979c8328ad5857cb5484ffb8f62128a2bdaf3 ("Enhance Lucene benchmark
module's ReutersContentSource to use more concurrency while indexing").
Julie
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 9:21 AM Policeman Jenkins Server <
Welcome Greg!!
On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 3:59 PM Robert Muir wrote:
> Welcome!
>
> On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 3:47 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
> >
> > I'm pleased to announce that Greg Miller has accepted the PMC's
> invitation to become a committer.
> >
> > Greg, the tradition is that new committers
hmarks is a good one to be using.
> >>
> >> While it may be hip/trendy/popular, it clearly states that it is only
> >> for toy datasets that fit in RAM:
> >>
> https://github.com/erikbern/ann-benchmarks/blob/master/README.md#principles
> >>
> >>
&g
ery concerned
> ann-benchmarks is a good one to be using.
>
> While it may be hip/trendy/popular, it clearly states that it is only
> for toy datasets that fit in RAM:
> https://github.com/erikbern/ann-benchmarks/blob/master/README.md#principles
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 20
:
* Search recall + QPS (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9937)
* Index speed (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9941)
Thanks Mike for your insights so far on the search ticket.
Julie
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 12:37 PM Julie Tibshirani
wrote:
> I filed one more JIRA ab
Welcome Zach!!
Julie
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 9:23 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
> Congratulations and welcome, Zach. Well deserved!
>
> Dawid
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 4:14 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
> >
> > I'm pleased to announce that Zach Chen has accepted the PMC's invitation
> to become a
Hello everyone! I will pick up LUCENE-9908.
I had marked LUCENE-9583 as a blocker but I'm on board with removing its
blocker status given we can make changes later. I hope to come back to the
issue soon with some ideas.
Julie
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:42 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
> I agree
I filed one more JIRA about the approach to specifying the NN algorithm:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9905.
As a summary, here's the current list of vector API issues we're tracking:
* Reconsider the format name (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9855)
* Revise
Welcome Peter!!
Julie
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 11:58 AM Michael Sokolov wrote:
> Welcome, Peter!
>
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 2:39 PM Michael McCandless
> wrote:
> >
> > Welcome Peter! Thank you for the massive Hunspell improvements!
> >
> > Mike McCandless
> >
> > http://blog.mikemccandless.com
Congratulations Mike!!
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 3:12 PM Gus Heck wrote:
> Congratulations :)
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 5:42 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe <
> tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Congratulations Mike!
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 2:42 PM Steve Rowe wrote:
>>
>>> Congrats Mike!
>>>
Sorry about that, fixing now! I've been having trouble with backports and
`ant precommit`, I'll ask for help in a separate channel...
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 3:00 PM Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> This appears to have been broken by
> fcb922bea18fde00d0d657947b1554addb49b47e ...
>
> The javadocs
+1
SUCCESS! [0:52:56.337991]
Julie
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:13 PM Anshum Gupta
wrote:
> +1
> SUCCESS! [0:59:24.721238]
>
> Smoke tester passed, tried running a sample app with tons of collections
> created, random data indexed, and some querying and all looked fine w/
> SolrJ.
>
> The
> > On Wed., Nov. 18, 2020, 12:59 p.m. Dawid Weiss,
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Congratulations and welcome, Julie.
>> >
>> > I think juliet is not a bad nick at all, you just need to who -all |
>> grep "romeo"... :)
>> >
>>
Julie Tibshirani created LUCENE-8952:
Summary: Use a sort key instead of true distance in
NearestNeighbors.
Key: LUCENE-8952
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8952
Project: Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16654018#comment-16654018
]
Julie Tibshirani edited comment on LUCENE-8535 at 10/17/18 7:22 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16654018#comment-16654018
]
Julie Tibshirani commented on LUCENE-8535:
--
I initially added a dependency on ‘join’ as part
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16466623#comment-16466623
]
Julie Tibshirani commented on LUCENE-8287:
--
We caught up offline, and [~jim.ferenczi] agrees
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16466226#comment-16466226
]
Julie Tibshirani edited comment on LUCENE-8287 at 5/7/18 5:37 PM:
--
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16466226#comment-16466226
]
Julie Tibshirani edited comment on LUCENE-8287 at 5/7/18 5:32 PM:
--
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16466226#comment-16466226
]
Julie Tibshirani commented on LUCENE-8287:
--
I uploaded a patch that throws
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julie Tibshirani updated LUCENE-8287:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-8287.patch
> ContextQuery with empty RegexCompletionQuery produ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16466115#comment-16466115
]
Julie Tibshirani edited comment on LUCENE-8288 at 5/7/18 4:42 PM:
--
Thank
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16466115#comment-16466115
]
Julie Tibshirani commented on LUCENE-8288:
--
Thank you [~jim.ferenczi]! I'm looking forward
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julie Tibshirani updated LUCENE-8288:
-
Summary: Context query with regex "." produces an assertion failure (was:
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julie Tibshirani updated LUCENE-8288:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-8288-repro.patch
> ContextQuery "." for RegexCompletionQ
Julie Tibshirani created LUCENE-8288:
Summary: ContextQuery "." for RegexCompletionQuery produces an
assertion failure
Key: LUCENE-8288
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/L
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julie Tibshirani updated LUCENE-8287:
-
Description:
When an empty RegexCompletionQuery is provided to ContextQuery
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julie Tibshirani updated LUCENE-8287:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-8287-repro.patch
> ContextQuery with empty RegexCompletionQu
Julie Tibshirani created LUCENE-8287:
Summary: ContextQuery with empty RegexCompletionQuery produces an
assertion failure
Key: LUCENE-8287
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8287
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14232652#comment-14232652
]
Julie Tibshirani commented on LUCENE-5929:
--
No problem, thank you Michael
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14201523#comment-14201523
]
Julie Tibshirani commented on LUCENE-5929:
--
Pinging this ticket since I haven't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julie Tibshirani updated LUCENE-5929:
-
Lucene Fields: New,Patch Available (was: Patch Available)
Standard highlighting
Julie Tibshirani created LUCENE-5929:
Summary: Standard highlighting doesn't work for
ToParentBlockJoinQuery
Key: LUCENE-5929
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5929
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julie Tibshirani updated LUCENE-5929:
-
Attachment: HighligherTest.patch
Standard highlighting doesn't work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14127694#comment-14127694
]
Julie Tibshirani commented on LUCENE-5929:
--
I have a simple fix ready
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14127694#comment-14127694
]
Julie Tibshirani edited comment on LUCENE-5929 at 9/9/14 10:38 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14127694#comment-14127694
]
Julie Tibshirani edited comment on LUCENE-5929 at 9/10/14 12:17 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julie Tibshirani updated LUCENE-5929:
-
Lucene Fields: Patch Available (was: New)
Standard highlighting doesn't work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14127694#comment-14127694
]
Julie Tibshirani edited comment on LUCENE-5929 at 9/10/14 1:27 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julie Tibshirani updated LUCENE-5929:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-5929.patch
Standard highlighting doesn't work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14127694#comment-14127694
]
Julie Tibshirani edited comment on LUCENE-5929 at 9/10/14 4:31 AM
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
