[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16630198#comment-16630198
]
Mihaly Toth commented on SOLR-8335:
---
Thanks, [~manokovacs]. Sure, please take it over.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16337060#comment-16337060
]
Mihaly Toth commented on SOLR-11873:
[~markrmil...@gmail.com], can you please look into this? As I see
Mihaly Toth created SOLR-11873:
--
Summary: Use time based expiration cache in all places in
HdfsDirectoryFactory
Key: SOLR-11873
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11873
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16191347#comment-16191347
]
Mihaly Toth commented on SOLR-10904:
[~markrmil...@gmail.com], I will try to put up a patch for this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mihaly Toth updated SOLR-8335:
--
Attachment: SOLR-8335.patch
Attaching the proposal. 2 further notes beside my comments above:
* If lock
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16156960#comment-16156960
]
Mihaly Toth commented on SOLR-8335:
---
As I see this was given up to be fixed, but I believe this is doable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16092351#comment-16092351
]
Mihaly Toth commented on SOLR-10338:
Great, thank you. I will check the status tomorrow then. ;)
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16092336#comment-16092336
]
Mihaly Toth commented on SOLR-10889:
As I see in Solr 7 this will not be an issue because of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16092317#comment-16092317
]
Mihaly Toth commented on SOLR-10338:
Well, this is my first issue to which I contributed, and I have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16059138#comment-16059138
]
Mihaly Toth commented on SOLR-7511:
---
One strategy could be to decide based on the replication factor. If
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16057705#comment-16057705
]
Mihaly Toth commented on SOLR-10889:
bq. The only counter argument that comes into my mind is too
Mihaly Toth created SOLR-10904:
--
Summary: Unnecessary waiting during failover in case of failed
core creation
Key: SOLR-10904
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10904
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mihaly Toth updated SOLR-10889:
---
Attachment: SOLR-10889.patch
Here is the unit test and the implementation (first one is bigger)
*
Mihaly Toth created SOLR-10889:
--
Summary: Stale zookeper information is used during failover check
Key: SOLR-10889
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10889
Project: Solr
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16047581#comment-16047581
]
Mihaly Toth commented on SOLR-10338:
I looked into the your latest patch [~hossman]. I have tested
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mihaly Toth updated SOLR-10338:
---
Attachment: SOLR-10338.patch
I tried to keep it simple, that is why I used only a flag to skip this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15998182#comment-15998182
]
Mihaly Toth commented on SOLR-10338:
[~hossman], [~markrmil...@gmail.com] do you have any comments,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mihaly Toth updated SOLR-10338:
---
Attachment: SOLR-10338.patch
I tried again setting {{java.security.egd}} from a class itself. It is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15993634#comment-15993634
]
Mihaly Toth commented on SOLR-10338:
Yes, let me try again. :)
[~hossman] Let me do some testing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15983639#comment-15983639
]
Mihaly Toth commented on SOLR-7141:
---
Until SOLR-7427 gets fixed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15976243#comment-15976243
]
Mihaly Toth commented on SOLR-10338:
Even though generating a random number is pretty fast in case it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15971526#comment-15971526
]
Mihaly Toth commented on SOLR-10338:
Thanks [~markrmil...@gmail.com]. Let me know if there is anything
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15956629#comment-15956629
]
Mihaly Toth commented on SOLR-10338:
Ok, [~markrmil...@gmail.com] :)
Just noticed that the new patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mihaly Toth updated SOLR-10338:
---
Attachment: SOLR-10338.patch
How about such a fix? In case randomness is blocking Solr tests will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mihaly Toth reopened SOLR-10338:
Until the tests get fixed I reopen the issue.
> Configure SecureRandom non blocking for tests.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15954874#comment-15954874
]
Mihaly Toth commented on SOLR-10338:
Sorry, next time I will have a closer look on the test failures
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mihaly Toth updated SOLR-10338:
---
Attachment: SOLR-10338.patch
As far as the tests concerned, here is an updated patch where the check
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15947078#comment-15947078
]
Mihaly Toth commented on SOLR-10338:
[~hossman], sounds like an excellent categorization of
Mihaly Toth created SOLR-10385:
--
Summary: Random source for SecureRandom in production
Key: SOLR-10385
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10385
Project: Solr
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15945251#comment-15945251
]
Mihaly Toth commented on SOLR-10338:
[~elyograg], I tend to agree with this approach. Your comment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mihaly Toth updated SOLR-10338:
---
Attachment: SOLR-10338.patch
Sure, [~markrmil...@gmail.com]. I was testing my changes in dev-tools. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15939055#comment-15939055
]
Mihaly Toth commented on SOLR-10338:
I am convinced.
> Configure SecureRandom non blocking
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15939053#comment-15939053
]
Mihaly Toth commented on SOLR-10352:
I dont want to hijack the original intention of this issue. So
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15939025#comment-15939025
]
Mihaly Toth commented on SOLR-10338:
bq. Is there a similar change we can make to help people running
34 matches
Mail list logo
