-1
Solr is used in many ways and scenarios. To cubbyhole it by not allowing it
to integrate with current web containers would really hurt its excellent
flexibility.
Many many (most?) Solr implementations use the war very extensively and to
very good effect.
Moving forward, how about having the war
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13264570#comment-13264570
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1861:
Would a Solrj client be able to intrinsic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13264297#comment-13264297
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-3421:
It's also worth noting that one of the a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13264296#comment-13264296
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-3421:
There is an existing patch for this behav
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13188477#comment-13188477
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1672:
Some optimizations/changes to the faceting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13187108#comment-13187108
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1709:
The original patch was actually for 3.x, s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13178536#comment-13178536
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1872:
Hi,
I've not yet tried it directly with
Yes, there has been much work and discussions on doc-level security in Solr.
The main problem with building in application-level security into Solr
is that there are myriad ways to approach it, depending on
requirements, as well as plenty of issues to address generally
regarding security - e.g. whe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049727#comment-13049727
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-2593:
This is a really great idea, thanks!
If
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13022697#comment-13022697
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1709:
Yes, the deprecation story makes s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13020802#comment-13020802
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1709:
Updating ResponseBuilder rather than Facet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13016770#comment-13016770
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-2438:
As I mentioned above, the approach is a li
Hi Patrick,
This may or may not be helpful for your requirements, but there is a
new, somewhat related patch for case-insensitive wildcard queries:
It's in: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2438
HTH,
Peter
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Patrick Allaert (JIRA) wrote:
>
> [
> ht
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13010268#comment-13010268
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-2438:
If you're like me, you may have often
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Sturge updated SOLR-2438:
---
Attachment: SOLR-2438.patch
Attached patch file
> Case Insensitive Search for Wildcard Quer
Case Insensitive Search for Wildcard Queries
Key: SOLR-2438
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2438
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Peter Sturge
This
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006445#comment-13006445
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-2242:
+1 Yep, me too. Useful feature, this.
&
Hi,
I (and apparently others) have noticed a rather strange and seemingly
intermittent ClassCastException in facet caching when using join (SOLR-2272)
and sometimes pivot as well.
A similar discussion from others noticing this can be found here:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/30c
query for the next. The patch does not
> contribute a multi-query query parser, or means of merging the results into
> a final result.
>
>
>
> Karl
>
>
>
> *From:* ext Peter Sturge [mailto:peter.stu...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, March 04, 2011 1:04 PM
> *To:* de
Hi Karl,
Yes, from looking at the conflicts, it looked like trunk changes were
causing the errors - but won't be too difficult to fix these.
I've got the patch (+tweaks) installed and working, and basic (i.e. non
qt=multiquery) searches are working fine.
What I can't figure out is how to enter in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13002701#comment-13002701
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-2026:
Hi Karl,
This patch is a really good idea -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12994847#comment-12994847
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-2245:
I've been meaning to get back to this,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12994716#comment-12994716
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1709:
Hi David,
Thank you thank you thank you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12988013#action_12988013
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1709:
Hi David,
Yes, at the time my patching wa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12987533#action_12987533
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1709:
Hi David,
I thought this was for the 3x br
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12970785#action_12970785
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1729:
Many thanks for finishing off this patch. Sor
ssues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1729
>> Project: Solr
>> Issue Type: Improvement
>> Components: search
>> Affects Versions: 1.4
>> Environment: Solr 1.4
>> Reporter: Peter Sturge
>> Priority: M
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966533#action_12966533
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1729:
Hi Peter,
So, the patches are clean (for 1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966494#action_12966494
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1729:
Hi Peter,
Not sure why it would work, then
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966238#action_12966238
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1729:
So is 1709 ok, but 1729 isn't?
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966031#action_12966031
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1709:
It's a good idea to apply SOLR-1729 in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12935898#action_12935898
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-2245:
Forgo to mention...
Because this now supp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Sturge updated SOLR-2245:
---
Attachment: SOLR-2245.zip
This patch update does a more proper delta-import implementation, rather
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12934800#action_12934800
]
Peter Sturge edited comment on SOLR-2245 at 11/23/10 5:5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12934800#action_12934800
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-2245:
This latest version of the upd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Sturge updated SOLR-2245:
---
Attachment: SOLR-2245.patch
> MailEntityProcessor Upd
, 1.4
Reporter: Peter Sturge
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 1.4.2
Attachments: SOLR-2245.patch
This patch addresses a number of issues in the MailEntityProcessor
contrib-extras module.
The changes are outlined here:
* Added an 'includeContent' entity
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Sturge updated SOLR-2245:
---
Attachment: SOLR-2245.patch
> MailEntityProcessor Upd
Hi Solr folks,
I admit I'm new to DIH, so I thought I'd put this out there before
generating a Jira issue:
I've been doing some work with importing emails using the truly
fabulous MailEntityProcessor. Fantastic!
I have noticed, however, that in order to retrieve email content into
the Solr 'cont
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929786#action_12929786
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1709:
Hi Peter,
Thanks for your message. There&
to this Jira issue?
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1875
>
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:42 AM, Peter Sturge wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Starting a new thread for this question, as it's a little separate
>> from the 3.x cache warming thread:
>
Hi,
Starting a new thread for this question, as it's a little separate
from the 3.x cache warming thread:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/fdc19610bdf6e179/tuning_solr_caches_with_high_commit_rates_nrt#adf9ee007ce18ba6
The new fcs/per-segment faceting that's in the 4.x trunk looks
Hi,
Starting a new thread for this question, as it's a little separate
from the 3.x cache warming thread:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/fdc19610bdf6e179/tuning_solr_caches_with_high_commit_rates_nrt#adf9ee007ce18ba6
The new fcs/per-segment faceting that's in the 4.x trunk looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12906497#action_12906497
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-2100:
I'm not really familiar with the reserva
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Sturge updated SOLR-2100:
---
Attachment: SOLR-2100.PATCH
> Fix for saving commit points during java-based back
: replication (java)
Affects Versions: 1.4.1, 1.4
Reporter: Peter Sturge
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 1.4.2
This patch fixes the saving of commit points during backup operations.
This fixes the perviously commited (for 1.4) SOLR-1475 patch.
1. In
After doing some testing patching IndexDeletionPolicyWrapper, looks like
there is a second problem, in:
IndexDeletionPolicyWrapper$IndexCommitWrapper.delete(), where it calls
contains() instead of containsKey() on the savedCommits map:
IndexDeletionPolicyWrapper.java:
- if(savedCommits.contai
Hi,
This post is related to SOLR-1475 - 'Java-based remplication doesn't
properly reserve its commit point during backups', and index backups in
general.
In Solr 1.4 and 1.4.1, the SOLR-1475 patch is certainly there, but I don't
believe it truly addresses the problem.
Here's why:
When a 'backup
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12867080#action_12867080
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1163:
Hi Uri,
The configuration for url connection
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12866674#action_12866674
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1163:
Hi Uri,
Really like what you've done
Have a look at this thread:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/d1e338dc452db2e4/how_can_i_protect_the_solr_cores
It shows how to setup basic authentication. It's targeted for Jetty, but the
same technique can be used fro TomCat.
HTH,
Peter
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Matthew
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12862225#action_12862225
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1895:
That makes total sense to keep a proxy
ver your data source is. There are certainly a number of
> "repositories" with this characteristic, though - the web, rss feeds, file
> systems, etc.
>
> Karl
>
> --
> *From:* ext Peter Sturge [mailto:peter.stu...@googlemail.com]
> *Sent:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12862215#action_12862215
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1895:
Right, ok, so you're using a proxy app t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12862206#action_12862206
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1895:
{quote}
The usual way is to configure
ince this service would have a high load, and only be used under one
> particular model, I'd suggest actually defining a whole new webapp for it,
> so it can be distributed/controlled independently.
>
> Karl
>
>
> --
> *From:* ext Peter Sturge [mai
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12862191#action_12862191
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1895:
>>>>>>
The presumption is t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12862150#action_12862150
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1895:
It's worth bearing in mind that more th
of room for different flavors of solution, so
> please by all means go ahead and propose your take on it!
>
> Karl
>
>
> From: ext Peter Sturge [peter.stu...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 8:07 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: connectors-
Hi Karl,
I wasn't trying to to put pay to your design proposal, really the opposite -
to highlight requirements that have found to be necessary for
customers/users, and to hopefully get the best functionality for the
product. If you feel I've put you out on any of the issues raised, then I
apologi
; web applications, and even if they're using some repository with its own
> idea of security, there's a mapping between the AD users and the
> repository's users. Doing that mapping is also the job of the LCF authority
> for that repository.
>
> Hope this helps. Also, I'm
entially be multiple values for each of these two
> fields.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Karl
>
> --
> *From:* ext Peter Sturge [mailto:peter.stu...@googlemail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 20, 2010 6:51 PM
>
> *To:* connectors-u...@incubator.apa
tication, which needs a
> solution.
>
> Karl
>
> --
> *From:* ext Peter Sturge [mailto:peter.stu...@googlemail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 20, 2010 10:44 AM
> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: FW: Solr and LCF security at query time
&g
If you want to do this completely within Solr, have a look at:
SOLR-1834 and SOLR-1872. These use a SearchComponent plugin for Solr.
Thanks,
Peter
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:25 PM, wrote:
> FYI
>
> --
> *From:* Wright Karl (Nokia-S/Cambridge)
> *Sent:* Tuesday, Ap
64 matches
Mail list logo
