[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-9592) decorateDocValues cause serious performance issue because of using slowCompositeReaderWrapper

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15545222#comment-15545222 ] Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-9592 at 10/4/16 12:26 PM: -- Nice catch! I

Re: SolrJ 6.2 now depends on Google-Guava and Jackson WTF?!

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Timothy Potter wrote: > on that note, what's that woodstox stuff used for? Very old reasons: Originally, license issues: http://markmail.org/message/tnsfyvykendpzcwq And then performance issues, made worse by the non-thread-safe factories:

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4164) Result Grouping fails if no hits

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15544135#comment-15544135 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-4164: bq. In this case group.limit kinda more like rows parameter

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-4164) Result Grouping fails if no hits

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15543928#comment-15543928 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-4164: bq. I am certain that in Solr 4.10 non-cloud specifying -1 did

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-9519) Check sub-facets of empty facet buckets for operations that may expand the domain (like filter exclusions)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15540889#comment-15540889 ] Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-9519 at 10/2/16 11:23 PM: -- The domain

[jira] [Closed] (SOLR-8472) Improve debugability of chaos tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley closed SOLR-8472. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 5.5 Yeah, we can close this... I don't remember off-hand what

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9519) Check sub-facets of empty facet buckets for operations that may expand the domain (like filter exclusions)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15540889#comment-15540889 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9519: The domain check may need to be recursive. A direct child may

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9579) Reuse lucene FieldType in createField flow during ingestion

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15537371#comment-15537371 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9579: A couple of years ago I prototyped making SchemaField implement

Re: LUCENE_CHANGES.txt???

Release dates were always a problem because one would have to guess when the vote would pass (and change the date every time a new RC is spun... error prone). Perhaps just add month+year? -Yonik On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:53 AM, David Smiley wrote: > +1 to fix the

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9310) PeerSync fails on a node restart due to IndexFingerPrint mismatch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15520083#comment-15520083 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9310: I just happened to notice that PeerSyncReplicationTest failed

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6090) Remove unreachable printLayout usage in cloud test

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15516901#comment-15516901 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-6090: bq. Log it in debug level or add it when necessary Perhaps

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6090) Remove unreachable printLayout usage in cloud test

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15516413#comment-15516413 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-6090: bq. I cannot find where this variable is set to true so

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7453) Change naming of variables/apis from docid to docnum

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15513380#comment-15513380 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-7453: -- I don't think changing the name really helps a new user

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9546) There is a lot of unnecessary boxing/unboxing going on in {{SolrParams}} class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15511162#comment-15511162 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9546: bq. That was just one example. Check getBool() I was responding

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9546) There is a lot of unnecessary boxing/unboxing going on in {{SolrParams}} class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15511103#comment-15511103 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9546: Hmmm, that's weird... the original methods did use primitives

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7453) Change naming of variables/apis from docid to docnum

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15510820#comment-15510820 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-7453: -- Indeed, "docIndex" can also be read as

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9528) Make _docid_ (lucene id) a pseudo field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15505254#comment-15505254 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9528: docid() as a value source is a good idea... as you say, makes

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9528) Make _docid_ (lucene id) a pseudo field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15503230#comment-15503230 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9528: -1 to changing the name. \_docid\_ has been around forever

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9528) Make _docid_ (lucene id) a pseudo field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15501376#comment-15501376 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9528: bq. I'm not a fan of allowing docid to be used as input

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9524) SolrIndexSearcher.getIndexFingerprint uses dubious sunchronization

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15499113#comment-15499113 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9524: bq. We didn't have any caching till now. So, it is not going

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9524) SolrIndexSearcher.getIndexFingerprint uses dubious sunchronization

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15497304#comment-15497304 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9524: bq. I'm also a little sceptical of the claim that multiple threads

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9310) PeerSync fails on a node restart due to IndexFingerPrint mismatch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15497183#comment-15497183 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9310: I only tested with the HDFS variant quickly... it tends to fail

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9310) PeerSync fails on a node restart due to IndexFingerPrint mismatch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15497044#comment-15497044 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9310: I looped HdfsChaosMoneyNothingIsSafeTest after this change, and I

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9524) SolrIndexSearcher.getIndexFingerprint uses dubious sunchronization

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15497002#comment-15497002 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9524: Since SOLR-9310 has already been released (5.5.3?), we can't re

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9524) SolrIndexSearcher.getIndexFingerprint uses dubious sunchronization

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15496737#comment-15496737 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9524: Ha - nice catch! > SolrIndexSearcher.getIndexFingerprint u

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9524) SolrIndexSearcher.getIndexFingerprint uses dubious sunchronization

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15496691#comment-15496691 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9524: It wouldn't be a DCL anti-pattern (i.e. not thread safe) in either

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-9519) Check sub-facets of empty facet buckets for operations that may expand the domain (like filter exclusions)

Yonik Seeley created SOLR-9519: -- Summary: Check sub-facets of empty facet buckets for operations that may expand the domain (like filter exclusions) Key: SOLR-9519 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15484994#comment-15484994 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-7440: -- bq. Would this be faster to test if we configure a larger

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7444) Remove StopFilter from StandardAnalyzer in Lucene-Core

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15481829#comment-15481829 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-7444: -- +1 > Remove StopFilter from StandardAnalyzer in Lucene-C

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7318) Graduate StandardAnalyzer out of analyzers module into core

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15481802#comment-15481802 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-7318: -- Or deprecate what was done in this issue instead. Having

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley resolved LUCENE-7440. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 6.3 master (7.0) > Docum

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-7440: - Attachment: LUCENE-7440.patch Ok, I did a quick review to ensure that the other operand

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15477144#comment-15477144 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-7440: -- Regarding the 1.8B docs number... at least in my tests I saw

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-7440: - Affects Version/s: (was: master (7.0)) 2.2 > Document skipp

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-7440: - Attachment: LUCENE-7440.patch Here's a patch, and a test that fails w/o the patch (takes 30min

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-7440: - Description: Large skips on large indexes fail. Anything that uses skips (such as a boolean

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-7440: - Description: Large skips on large indexes fail. Anything that uses skips (such as a boolean

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15477039#comment-15477039 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-7440: -- Patch coming... was waiting for tests to pass. > Docum

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-7440: - Affects Version/s: master (7.0) > Document skipping on large indexes is bro

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-7440) Document skipping on large indexes is broken

Yonik Seeley created LUCENE-7440: Summary: Document skipping on large indexes is broken Key: LUCENE-7440 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7440 Project: Lucene - Core Issue

Re: Contacted by IBM about problems with Lucene/Solr on their JVM

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > I was contacted on my Apache email address a few days ago by somebody at > IBM who wasn't exactly happy that my Solr wiki page recommends not using > their Java. > > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ShawnHeisey > > He said

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9142) JSON Facet, add hash table method for terms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15455287#comment-15455287 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9142: bq. Do you mean this?: Code that needs a fast set would be changed

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9142) JSON Facet, add hash table method for terms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15454007#comment-15454007 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9142: Thanks David, good improvements! bq. DocSet is not necessarily

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5725) Efficient facets without counts for enum method

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15452409#comment-15452409 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-5725: bq. Hmmm, I'm looking at the algorithm

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7318) Graduate StandardAnalyzer out of analyzers module into core

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15452342#comment-15452342 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-7318: -- bq. I think it would make a good default for most Lucene

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5725) Efficient facets without counts for enum method

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15449060#comment-15449060 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-5725: Thinking about how we would expose this in the JSON Facet API, I

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5725) Efficient facets without counts for enum method

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15448980#comment-15448980 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-5725: enumprobing is a strange name, and doesn't convey the fact

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9449) Do not index _version_ field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15444606#comment-15444606 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9449: +1, the way we use _version_, it normally doesn't make sense

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9310) PeerSync fails on a node restart due to IndexFingerPrint mismatch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15437446#comment-15437446 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9310: Mark pointed me to SOLR-8085 for where/when we started buffering

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9310) PeerSync fails on a node restart due to IndexFingerPrint mismatch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15437214#comment-15437214 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9310: Ah, a piece of the puzzle: we didn't always buffer before peersync

Re: [JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux (64bit/jdk-9-ea+132) - Build # 1559 - Failure!

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote: > I believe these are from this commit: > > https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/43ca5078bf5f50cb46eaac3000ea7553dd47d26f > > I was going to commit a fix this as part of another small commit I'm about > to do. I'll

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9432) JSON Facet refactoring to support refinement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-9432: --- Attachment: SOLR-9432.patch > JSON Facet refactoring to support refinem

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9432) JSON Facet refactoring to support refinement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-9432: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 5.2) > JSON Facet refactoring to support refinem

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-7452) json facet api returning inconsistent counts in cloud set up

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-7452: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 5.2) > json facet api returning inconsistent counts in cloud set

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-9432) JSON Facet refactoring to support refinement

Yonik Seeley created SOLR-9432: -- Summary: JSON Facet refactoring to support refinement Key: SOLR-9432 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9432 Project: Solr Issue Type: Sub-task

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9310) PeerSync fails on a node restart due to IndexFingerPrint mismatch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15431250#comment-15431250 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9310: minor: since there is a cache now, we could sync on that and get

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-9310) PeerSync fails on a node restart due to IndexFingerPrint mismatch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15430922#comment-15430922 ] Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-9310 at 8/22/16 3:01 PM: - bq. What

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9310) PeerSync fails on a node restart due to IndexFingerPrint mismatch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15430922#comment-15430922 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9310: bq. What is the need for the cache? Multiple replicas syncing

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-9310) PeerSync fails on a node restart due to IndexFingerPrint mismatch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15430880#comment-15430880 ] Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-9310 at 8/22/16 2:44 PM: - Reopening

[jira] [Reopened] (SOLR-9310) PeerSync fails on a node restart due to IndexFingerPrint mismatch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley reopened SOLR-9310: Reopening... the cache that was added in SolrIndexSearcher is not thread safe and is checked outside

Re: Is precisionStep stuff still useful with docValues?

> On 20 August 2016 at 02:24, Michael McCandless > wrote: >> You should use dimensional points for range searching now. On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: > How would I do that? Solr does not currently have support. See

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9412) Update Macro Expander for replacement logic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15428708#comment-15428708 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9412: +1 to the idea, and to the latest patch. > Update Macro Expan

Re: Is precisionStep stuff still useful with docValues?

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:17 PM, David Smiley wrote: > I think it's a bad thing that we let you do queries on a field with > docValues that has no index *by default* -- i.e. without some field type > attribute where you expressly allow it because you know what you're

Re: Is precisionStep stuff still useful with docValues?

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: > But the > documentation that explains why the later are useful > (NumericRangeQuery) is now a (LegacyNumericRangeQuery) and the source > code seems to show that docValues can (should?) be used instead. Using

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7413) move legacy numeric support to backwards module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15424971#comment-15424971 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-7413: -- bq. modularization in Java 9 does not allow same package

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7413) move legacy numeric support to backwards module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15424772#comment-15424772 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-7413: -- I don't understand why it's necessary to move before removal

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9326) Ability to create/delete/list snapshots for a solr collection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15421153#comment-15421153 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9326: Starting to run unit tests now, and will commit later

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9326) Ability to create/delete/list snapshots for a solr collection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15420073#comment-15420073 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9326: Mostly reviewing this from the perspective of public API

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8586) Implement hash over all documents to check for shard synchronization

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15419145#comment-15419145 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-8586: You can set the environment variable solr.disableFingerprint

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-8586) Implement hash over all documents to check for shard synchronization

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15418799#comment-15418799 ] Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-8586 at 8/12/16 4:38 PM: - If the _version_

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8586) Implement hash over all documents to check for shard synchronization

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15418799#comment-15418799 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-8586: If the _version_ field doesn't have docValues, then it will be un

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9310) PeerSync fails on a node restart due to IndexFingerPrint mismatch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15417909#comment-15417909 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9310: bq. My fix is not to buffer updates commands that have PEER_SYNC

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9310) PeerSync fails on a node restart due to IndexFingerPrint mismatch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15417545#comment-15417545 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9310: You were ready to commit a fix though... so what was exactly

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9310) PeerSync fails on a node restart due to IndexFingerPrint mismatch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15417480#comment-15417480 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9310: bq. intention was to do the check later and not before starting

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9142) Improve JSON nested facets effeciency

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15415406#comment-15415406 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9142: Yep, lots of refactorings still make sense (and why at the Java

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7344) Deletion by query of uncommitted docs not working with DV updates

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15415339#comment-15415339 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-7344: -- bq. Here, "doc-1" should not be deleted, becau

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-7344) Deletion by query of uncommitted docs not working with DV updates

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15415339#comment-15415339 ] Yonik Seeley edited comment on LUCENE-7344 at 8/10/16 2:29 PM: --- bq. Here

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5944) Support updates of numeric DocValues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15415326#comment-15415326 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-5944: bq. Document that when inplace updates are configured/requested

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9351) JSON Facet field should sometimes default to facet.method=stream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15412078#comment-15412078 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9351: "stream" is fundamentally about not materializing the f

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9350) JSON Facet method:"stream" configurable use of filter cache threshold

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15411946#comment-15411946 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9350: Thanks, changes look good! > JSON Facet method:&quo

Re: Welcome Alexandre Rafalovitch as a Lucene/Solr committer!

Congrats Alexandre! -Yonik On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Jan Høydahl wrote: > I'm pleased to announce that Alexandre Rafalovitch has accepted the Lucene > PMC's invitation to become a committer. > > Alexandre, it's tradition that you introduce yourself with a brief

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9310) PeerSync fails on a node restart due to IndexFingerPrint mismatch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15392314#comment-15392314 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9310: bq. The variable name is confusing. maxInHash is not a hash max

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-7452) json facet api returning inconsistent counts in cloud set up

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-7452: --- Attachment: SOLR-7452.patch Didn't quite make it before the vacation... Here's a partial draft patch

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9308) SolrCloud RTG w/fq seems to ignore fqs - regardless of wether docs are committed or not

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15378677#comment-15378677 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9308: bq. And even if i try sending the RTG requests to both nodes

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9308) RTG w/fq seems to ignore fqs - regardless of wether docs are committed or not

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15378658#comment-15378658 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9308: Hmmm, there are definitely tests for "fq" in TestRealTi

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9290) TCP-connections in CLOSE_WAIT spikes during heavy indexing when SSL is enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15376974#comment-15376974 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9290: I haven't been following this issue, but this caught my eye: bq

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7452) json facet api returning inconsistent counts in cloud set up

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15375554#comment-15375554 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-7452: I actually just found some time to make a little progress

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9290) TCP-connections in CLOSE_WAIT spikes during heavy indexing when SSL is enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15375243#comment-15375243 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9290: bq. if you have a link to a discussion about why it may lead

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9302) Better error message when running SQL queries in standalone mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15374996#comment-15374996 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9302: Ultimately it feels like one should be able to run an SQL query

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9285) ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException when ValueSourceAugmenter used with RTG on uncommitted doc

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15374299#comment-15374299 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9285: {quote} - refactors the ulog.openRealtimeSearcher() logic in RTG

Re: Converting double values to char[]

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > Before I launch off into ripping off the toString code fro, cay Float > and Double types Please look into licensing before you do that... Or rip off from Geronimo, which is ASL -Yonik

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9163) Confusing solrconfig.xml in the downloaded solr*.zip

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15368633#comment-15368633 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9163: FWIW, I'd be +1 on removing a lot of the cruft from *both

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9163) Confusing solrconfig.xml in the downloaded solr*.zip

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15368611#comment-15368611 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9163: bq. commented out example stuff, most of which refers to fields

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-9163) Confusing solrconfig.xml in the downloaded solr*.zip

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15368611#comment-15368611 ] Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-9163 at 7/8/16 10:38 PM: - bq. commented out

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9163) Confusing solrconfig.xml in the downloaded solr*.zip

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-9163: --- Fix Version/s: 6.2 > Confusing solrconfig.xml in the downloaded solr*.

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-9163) Confusing solrconfig.xml in the downloaded solr*.zip

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-9163. Resolution: Fixed Committed. The duplication is a shame though... Longer term it feels like we

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9163) Confusing solrconfig.xml in the downloaded solr*.zip

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15366258#comment-15366258 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9163: Is everyone OK with committing this as a first (possibly only

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9163) Confusing solrconfig.xml in the downloaded solr*.zip

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15366201#comment-15366201 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9163: bq. Yonik is this just the first step in addition to some

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-9163) Confusing solrconfig.xml in the downloaded solr*.zip

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-9163: --- Attachment: SOLR-9163.patch OK, full patch attached, essentially syncing the two configsets. I'll

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9235) Indexing stuck after delete by range query

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15363234#comment-15363234 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9235: Yeah, looks good! > Indexing stuck after delete by range qu

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >