[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-12328) Adding graph json facet domain change

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley reassigned SOLR-12328: --- Assignee: Yonik Seeley > Adding graph json facet domain change >

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-12410) enable caching of domain-change queries

Yonik Seeley created SOLR-12410: --- Summary: enable caching of domain-change queries Key: SOLR-12410 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12410 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-9685) tag a query in JSON syntax

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley reassigned SOLR-9685: -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Yonik Seeley (was: Mikhail Khludnev) Fix Version/s:

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9685) tag a query in JSON syntax

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16492028#comment-16492028 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9685: Thans Dmitry, I'm reviewing now. > tag a query in

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12343) JSON Field Facet refinement can return incorrect counts/stats for sorted buckets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16481366#comment-16481366 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-12343: - I think the most important thing here is that i

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12338) Replay buffering tlog in parallel

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16480089#comment-16480089 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-12338: - {quote}This is a very costly/risky logic to han

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-9685) tag a query in JSON syntax

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16479895#comment-16479895 ] Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-9685 at 5/17/18 11:47 PM: --

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9685) tag a query in JSON syntax

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16479895#comment-16479895 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-9685: Thanks Mikhail, I like the syntax! .bq omitting l

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12338) Replay buffering tlog in parallel

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16479675#comment-16479675 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-12338: - I haven't been following this issue, but the ne

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11277) Add auto hard commit setting based on tlog size

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16479071#comment-16479071 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11277: - bq. is this what you'd suggested?  Yes, that sh

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11277) Add auto hard commit setting based on tlog size

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16478453#comment-16478453 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11277: - Hmmm, and check for tlog == null as well inside

[jira] [Reopened] (SOLR-11277) Add auto hard commit setting based on tlog size

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley reopened SOLR-11277: - Assignee: (was: Anshum Gupta) I recently tried beasting TestStressVersions, and I got a coup

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12352) Solr mod function query does not yield correct results

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16475093#comment-16475093 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-12352: - bq. Solr's functions operate on floats - maybe

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12340) Solr 7 does not do a phrase search by default for certain queries.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16474975#comment-16474975 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-12340: - Yes, this looks like an unfortunate change of b

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-12170) terms facet on a date field can fail

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley reassigned SOLR-12170: --- Assignee: Yonik Seeley > terms facet on a date field can fail > -

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-12170) terms facet on a date field can fail

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-12170. - Resolution: Fixed > terms facet on a date field can fail > >

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-12326) Unnecessary refinement requests

Yonik Seeley created SOLR-12326: --- Summary: Unnecessary refinement requests Key: SOLR-12326 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12326 Project: Solr Issue Type: Bug Security Lev

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12170) terms facet on a date field can fail

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16466162#comment-16466162 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-12170: - Attached draft patch that seems to fix the issu

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12170) terms facet on a date field can fail

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-12170: Attachment: SOLR-12170.patch > terms facet on a date field can fail > --

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-10442) xtendedDismaxQParser (edismax) makes pf* require search term exactly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16435619#comment-16435619 ] Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-10442 at 4/12/18 1:59 PM: --

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10442) xtendedDismaxQParser (edismax) makes pf* require search term exactly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16435619#comment-16435619 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-10442: - I was able to replicate the query structure you

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-12190) need to properly escape output in GraphMLResponseWriter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-12190. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: master (8.0) 7.4 > need to properly esc

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12190) need to properly escape output in GraphMLResponseWriter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16428633#comment-16428633 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-12190: - Here's a patch. It also fixes what looks like

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12190) need to properly escape output in GraphMLResponseWriter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-12190: Attachment: SOLR-12190.patch > need to properly escape output in GraphMLResponseWriter > ---

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12155) Solr 7.2.1 deadlock in UnInvertedField.getUnInvertedField()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16427252#comment-16427252 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-12155: - If we wrap in a SolrException, we can specify t

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-12190) need to properly escape output in GraphMLResponseWriter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley reassigned SOLR-12190: --- Assignee: Yonik Seeley > need to properly escape output in GraphMLResponseWriter > --

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-12190) need to properly escape output in GraphMLResponseWriter

Yonik Seeley created SOLR-12190: --- Summary: need to properly escape output in GraphMLResponseWriter Key: SOLR-12190 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12190 Project: Solr Issue Type

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12155) Solr 7.2.1 deadlock in UnInvertedField.getUnInvertedField()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16427026#comment-16427026 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-12155: - OK, so this will return null on failure instead

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7976) Add a parameter to TieredMergePolicy to merge segments that have more than X percent deleted documents

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16424851#comment-16424851 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-7976: -- bq. I further propose that this be an optio

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-12170) terms facet on a date field can fail

Yonik Seeley created SOLR-12170: --- Summary: terms facet on a date field can fail Key: SOLR-12170 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12170 Project: Solr Issue Type: Bug Securit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12020) terms faceting on date field fails in distributed refinement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16411638#comment-16411638 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-12020: - Thanks for the extra info! I haven't been able

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12020) terms faceting on date field fails in distributed refinement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-12020: Attachment: SOLR-12020_test.patch > terms faceting on date field fails in distributed refinement > -

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12020) terms faceting on date field fails in distributed refinement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16405067#comment-16405067 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-12020: - bq. Maybe JSONWriter.write should know about Da

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-12064) NullPointerException in JSON facet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-12064. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 7.3 > NullPointerException in JSON facet > ---

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12064) NullPointerException in JSON facet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16390554#comment-16390554 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-12064: - Yeah, I'll try to get to it tomorrow. > NullPo

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12064) NullPointerException in JSON facet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16390466#comment-16390466 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-12064: - Thanks Karthik, good catch with the test case!

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-12064) NullPointerException in JSON facet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley reassigned SOLR-12064: --- Assignee: Yonik Seeley > NullPointerException in JSON facet > ---

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12064) NullPointerException in JSON facet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-12064: Issue Type: Bug (was: Improvement) > NullPointerException in JSON facet > -

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-12020) terms faceting on date field fails in distributed refinement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-12020. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 7.3 > terms faceting on date field fails in distributed re

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-12037) Reduce noise from flakey tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16377995#comment-16377995 ] Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-12037 at 3/5/18 5:32 PM: -

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12020) terms faceting on date field fails in distributed refinement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16384313#comment-16384313 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-12020: - Attached a patch to fix. The issue was that JS

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12020) terms faceting on date field fails in distributed refinement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-12020: Attachment: SOLR-12020.patch > terms faceting on date field fails in distributed refinement > --

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12020) terms faceting on date field fails in distributed refinement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16374740#comment-16374740 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-12020: - Attached failing test, currently working on a f

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12020) terms faceting on date field fails in distributed refinement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-12020: Attachment: SOLR-12020.patch > terms faceting on date field fails in distributed refinement > --

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12020) terms faceting on date field fails in distributed refinement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-12020: Affects Version/s: 6.6 > terms faceting on date field fails in distributed refinement >

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12020) terms faceting on date field fails in distributed refinement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-12020: Description: This appears to be a regression, as the reporter indicates that Solr 6.2 worked and So

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-12020) terms faceting on date field fails in distributed refinement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley reassigned SOLR-12020: --- Assignee: Yonik Seeley > terms faceting on date field fails in distributed refinement > -

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-12020) terms faceting on date field fails in distributed refinement

Yonik Seeley created SOLR-12020: --- Summary: terms faceting on date field fails in distributed refinement Key: SOLR-12020 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12020 Project: Solr Issu

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-12016) Reduce noise from flakey tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16373292#comment-16373292 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-12016: - bq. Also, I expect to add the annotation to som

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11775) json.facet can use inconsistent Long/Integer for "count" depending on shard count

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16349265#comment-16349265 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11775: - bq. It doesn't feel fair to pass the buck and s

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11775) json.facet can use inconsistent Long/Integer for "count" depending on shard count

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16348012#comment-16348012 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11775: - facet.field faceting does return an integer in

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11879) avoid creating a new Exception object for EOFException in FastinputStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16344964#comment-16344964 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11879: - We should also remove the exception being ignor

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11879) avoid creating a new Exception object for EOFException in FastinputStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16338708#comment-16338708 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11879: - I guess the easiest solution (without digging i

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-11879) avoid creating a new Exception object for EOFException in FastinputStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16338492#comment-16338492 ] Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-11879 at 1/25/18 2:37 AM: --

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-11879) avoid creating a new Exception object for EOFException in FastinputStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16338492#comment-16338492 ] Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-11879 at 1/25/18 12:46 AM: -

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11879) avoid creating a new Exception object for EOFException in FastinputStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16338492#comment-16338492 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11879: - bq. The EOFException is actually a signaling me

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11879) avoid creating a new Exception object for EOFException in FastinputStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16338409#comment-16338409 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11879: - This only seems useful if we have code that rea

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10122) lower memory usage for facet sorted on unique(other_field)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16306651#comment-16306651 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-10122: - A single shared hash table that includes the sl

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-11806) Use indirection for hash-based faceting

Yonik Seeley created SOLR-11806: --- Summary: Use indirection for hash-based faceting Key: SOLR-11806 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11806 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-11725) json.facet's stddev() function should be changed to use the "Corrected sample stddev" formula

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-11725: Component/s: Facet Module > json.facet's stddev() function should be changed to use the "Corrected s

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11725) json.facet's stddev() function should be changed to use the "Corrected sample stddev" formula

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16305994#comment-16305994 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11725: - {quote} > ...In general we've been moving towar

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11769) Sorting performance degrades when useFilterForSortedQuery is enabled and there is no filter query specified

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16298292#comment-16298292 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11769: - We just need to be careful about returning cach

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11746) numeric fields need better error handling for prefix/wildcard syntax -- consider uniform support for "foo:* == foo:[* TO *]"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16288675#comment-16288675 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11746: - IMO it should count as a bug that numeric_field

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11754) Remove AbstractSolrTestCase

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16288668#comment-16288668 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11754: - Yep, seems fine to me. > Remove AbstractSolrTe

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-11725) json.facet's stddev() function should be changed to use the "Corrected sample stddev" formula

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16281837#comment-16281837 ] Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-11725 at 12/7/17 2:03 PM: --

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-11733) json.facet refinement fails to bubble up some long tail (overrequested) terms?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-11733: Component/s: Facet Module > json.facet refinement fails to bubble up some long tail (overrequested)

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11725) json.facet's stddev() function should be changed to use the "Corrected sample stddev" formula

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16281837#comment-16281837 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11725: - +1 for changing... "N-1" is the more standard f

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-11733) json.facet refinement fails to bubble up some long tail (overrequested) terms?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16281258#comment-16281258 ] Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-11733 at 12/7/17 12:38 PM: -

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11733) json.facet refinement fails to bubble up some long tail (overrequested) terms?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16281258#comment-16281258 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11733: - I mentioned in SOLR-11729 the refinement algori

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11729) Increase default overrequest ratio/count in json.facet to match existing defaults for facet.overrequest.ratio & facet.overrequest.count ?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16281243#comment-16281243 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11729: - bq. Yonik Seeley: do you remember if there was

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-11664) range facets with with sub aggregations on string fields give incorrect results

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-11664. - Resolution: Fixed > range facets with with sub aggregations on string fields give incorrect > res

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11078) Solr query performance degradation since Solr 6.4.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16279312#comment-16279312 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11078: - I would either leave out the "or use StrField",

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-11664) range facets with with sub aggregations on string fields give incorrect results

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-11664: Attachment: SOLR-11664.patch Here's a completed patch. I backed out calling reset() from setReader()

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-11664) range facets with with sub aggregations on string fields give incorrect results

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-11664: Attachment: SOLR-11664.patch Here's a draft patch that shows the approach I'm taking to fix this. Ba

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-11664) range facets with with sub aggregations on string fields give incorrect results

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-11664: Priority: Blocker (was: Critical) > range facets with with sub aggregations on string fields give i

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-11664) range facets with with sub aggregations on string fields give incorrect results

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley reassigned SOLR-11664: --- Assignee: Yonik Seeley Affects Version/s: 7.0 Fix Version/s: 7.2 > range

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11664) range facets with with sub aggregations on string fields give incorrect results

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16278661#comment-16278661 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11664: - Debugging UniqueSinglevaluedSlotAcc points to t

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11706) JSON FacetModule can't compute stats (min,max,etc...) on multivalued fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16278490#comment-16278490 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11706: - bq. I'd prefer this interface and some of the r

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-8043) Attempting to add documents past limit can corrupt index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-8043: - Attachment: YCS_IndexTest7a.java The test code is just a modification of the previous code I was

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-11706) JSON FacetModule can't compute stats (min,max,etc...) on multivalued fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16272091#comment-16272091 ] Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-11706 at 11/30/17 3:08 AM: -

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11706) JSON FacetModule can't compute stats (min,max,etc...) on multivalued fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16272091#comment-16272091 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11706: - I was just trying to point out that it's a "yea

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8043) Attempting to add documents past limit can corrupt index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16272010#comment-16272010 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-8043: -- Turns out the test code that failed with a s

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-8043) Attempting to add documents past limit can corrupt index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16271874#comment-16271874 ] Yonik Seeley edited comment on LUCENE-8043 at 11/30/17 12:32 AM: --

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8043) Attempting to add documents past limit can corrupt index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16271874#comment-16271874 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-8043: -- I had worked on tracking this down for a bit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11706) JSON FacetModule can't compute stats (min,max,etc...) on multivalued fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16271695#comment-16271695 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11706: - Perhaps a bug at the user level, but more of a

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11695) JSON FacetModule needs equivilents for StatsComponent's "count" and "missing" features

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16269554#comment-16269554 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11695: - We already use "count" for the number of docume

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11684) Solr should not cache cheap filters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16269201#comment-16269201 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11684: - bq. LUCENE-7680 adds rules like a term query is

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8058) Never cache large TermInSetQuery instances

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16268949#comment-16268949 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-8058: -- {code} -public class TermInSetQuery extends

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11501) Depending on the parser, QParser should not parse local-params

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16261857#comment-16261857 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11501: - Thanks for including the upgrade notes before c

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-11664) range facets with with sub aggregations on string fields give incorrect results

Yonik Seeley created SOLR-11664: --- Summary: range facets with with sub aggregations on string fields give incorrect results Key: SOLR-11664 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11664 Project:

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-11553) facet refinement can use wrong access method

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-11553. - Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Yonik Seeley > facet refinement can use wrong access method > --

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-11251) Ref Guide: Add docs on JSON facet module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-11251. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 7.2 > Ref Guide: Add docs on JSON facet module > -

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-11251) Ref Guide: Add docs on JSON facet module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-11251: Attachment: SOLR-11251.patch First cut at a cleanup... - cleanups, including fixing random formatti

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11251) Ref Guide: Add docs on JSON facet module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16253602#comment-16253602 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11251: - OK, I'm taking a pass at cleaning some of this

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-11251) Ref Guide: Add docs on JSON facet module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley reassigned SOLR-11251: --- Assignee: Yonik Seeley > Ref Guide: Add docs on JSON facet module > -

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11641) {!frange} / FunctionRangeQuery should default to 100==getCost() so non-cached fq's default to post-filtering

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16251455#comment-16251455 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-11641: - Yeah, I think that should be fine. > {!frange}

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-11633) terms component doesn't work for point-date fields

Yonik Seeley created SOLR-11633: --- Summary: terms component doesn't work for point-date fields Key: SOLR-11633 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11633 Project: Solr Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-8043) Attempting to add documents past limit can corrupt index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-8043: - Affects Version/s: master (8.0) 7.0 > Attempting to add documents past lim

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-8043) Attempting to add documents past limit can corrupt index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16242531#comment-16242531 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-8043: -- At first I thought it might be more of a tra

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-8043) Attempting to add documents past limit can corrupt index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-8043: - Attachment: LUCENE-8043.patch Here's a little test program that can sometimes reproduce it. It's

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >