Github user mikemccand commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/129
I've merged this into Lucene's master (7.0), and I'm working on 6.x (#130)
now. Thanks @mattweber! Can you close this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user mikemccand commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/129
This change looks great to me! What an awesome improvement, to properly
use graph token streams at search time so multi-token synonyms are correct.
I'll push this in a few days once
Github user mattweber commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/129
Thanks @dsmiley! I have just pushed up code with your suggestions except
for using `BytesRefHash` due to the fact we might have the same `BytesRef` but
need a different id because we have
Github user mattweber commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/129
@mikemccand I addressed you comments. I also added some more tests and
fixed a bug that would yield wrong increment when a term that had previously
been seen was found again with an
Github user mattweber commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/129
Rebased against master, added missing ASF header.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
