FW: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net graduation from the incubator

fyi > From: geobmx...@hotmail.com > To: gene...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net graduation from the incubator > Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:58:23 -0700 > > > The vote passes with the following +1'

Re: [Lucene.Net] Graduation

until there is a stronger motive for alienating the user base. > > Regards, > > Jesse > > -Message d'origine- > De : Robert Jordan [mailto:robe...@gmx.net] > Envoyé : jeudi 2 février 2012 12:22 > À : lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org > Objet : Re: [Lu

RE: [Lucene.Net] Graduation

stronger motive for alienating the user base. Regards, Jesse -Message d'origine- De : Robert Jordan [mailto:robe...@gmx.net] Envoyé : jeudi 2 février 2012 12:22 À : lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org Objet : Re: [Lucene.Net] Graduation Hi, On 02.02.2012 03:27, Jean-Sylvain Boige wro

[Lucene.Net] Infrastructure Choices/Issues (was Re: [Lucene.Net] Graduation)

On 2012-02-02, Simone Chiaretta wrote: > I've seen that moving to a more "social" source control helps, like moving > to git or mercurial. Lucene.net is still on Subversion, and that makes > difficult for people to contribute sporadically. There already is a git-mirror (of trunk) on github at

Re: [Lucene.Net] Graduation

[I started to write a really long response and then figured I should split it to keep this thread focussed.] On 2012-02-02, Simone Chiaretta wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On 2012-02-01, Simone Chiaretta wrote: >>> As other said, while the user base is pretty

Re: [Lucene.Net] Graduation

Mine below On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2012-02-01, Simone Chiaretta wrote: > > > As other said, while the user base is pretty big, the dev community is > > relatively small and still relying on just a few people. > > Can you recommend an approach that would draw in

Re: [Lucene.Net] Graduation

Hi, On 02.02.2012 03:27, Jean-Sylvain Boige wrote: Sorry again if this is not the right thread, but what feature of .Net 4.0 do you currently leverage that wouldn't compile on 3.5? (which would be fine for us) Troy, can we really compare the impact of moving Lucene development to vs2010 to that

Re: [Lucene.Net] Graduation

tuation have to develop migration >> plans to get our products (and customers) to upgrade to the newer versions >> of .NET >> >> - Neal >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Jean-Sylvain Boige [mailto:jsbo...@aricie.fr] >> Sent: Wednesday, Febru

Re: [Lucene.Net] Graduation

; Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 12:44 PM > To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Graduation > > Hi all, > > I'm not sure if it's the best moment for that, but here are my 2 cents. > I have the feeling that a lot was done

RE: [Lucene.Net] Graduation

asser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 11:38 AM To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: [Lucene.Net] Graduation Stefan has it on his agenda to get us to graduate, so I wanted to kick off a conversation on how we feel about that - do we feel we are ready? Wh

RE: [Lucene.Net] Graduation

use of a few committers deeply involved, but it's as important to make sure most traditional integrators are following behind. Cheers, Jesse -Message d'origine- De : Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com] Envoyé : mercredi 1 février 2012 18:38 À : lucene-net-...@incubator.ap

[Lucene.Net] Graduation

Stefan has it on his agenda to get us to graduate, so I wanted to kick off a conversation on how we feel about that - do we feel we are ready? Why/why not. What are all the steps we need to take, etc. My two cents, Im worried about the sustainability of our community. I feel like we are a very