RE: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap

2011-11-22 Thread Prescott Nasser
Phone From: Scott Lombard Sent: 11/22/2011 8:56 AM To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap Mike, You're right about putting together a higher level discussion. Here are the road map items I see. I am interested in other have to say. N

Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap

2011-11-22 Thread Christopher Currens
the community can reference. > 5) Port 4.0 > > > > Scott > > > -Original Message- > > From: Michael Herndon [mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 10:28 AM > > To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [Luce

RE: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap

2011-11-22 Thread Scott Lombard
t; To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap > > While much of the content in this thread is valid and is > important, especially concerns, pain points, and > implementation details... we've gotten way off topic. > > road map != implementation de

Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap

2011-11-21 Thread Christopher Currens
y wrote: > > > >> > >> Chris, > >> > >> Sorry, if you took my comments about "pain of porting" personally. That > >> wasn't my intension. > >> > >> +1 for all your changes/divergences. I made/could have made them too. > >&

RE: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap

2011-11-21 Thread Digy
: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap So, if we're getting back to the line by line port discussion... I think either side of this discussion is too extreme. For the case in point Chris just mentioned (which I'm not really sure what part was so difficult, as I ported that library in about 30 mi

Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap

2011-11-21 Thread Troy Howard
> >> Sorry, if you took my comments about "pain of porting" personally. That >> wasn't my intension. >> >> +1 for all your changes/divergences. I made/could have made them too. >> >> DIGY >> >> -Original Message- >> From: C

RE: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap

2011-11-21 Thread Digy
due respect" & "Just my $0.02" paranthesis. DIGY -Original Message- From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 10:19 PM To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org; casper...@caspershouse.com Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap Some of

Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap

2011-11-21 Thread casper...@caspershouse.com
as they are now. - Nick From: "Christopher Currens" Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 3:18 PM To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org, casper...@caspershouse.com Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap Some of the Lucene classes have Dispose methods, well, ones that cal

Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap

2011-11-21 Thread Christopher Currens
l Dispose methods to take > inheritance into account, etc). > > > - Nick > > > > From: "Christopher Currens" > > Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 2:56 PM > > To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net]

Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap

2011-11-21 Thread casper...@caspershouse.com
eritance into account, etc). - Nick From: "Christopher Currens" Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 2:56 PM To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap Regarding the 3.0.3 branch I started last week, I've put in a lo

Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap

2011-11-21 Thread Christopher Currens
Regarding the 3.0.3 branch I started last week, I've put in a lot of late nights and gotten far more done in a week and a half than I expected. The list of changes is very large, and fortunately, I've documented it in some files that are in the branches root of certain projects. I'll list what ch